Ross Perot Surfaces

Jonathan Alter has a fun scoop in Newsweek: a rare interview with Ross Perot, America's most reclusive political figure. Three things jumped out at me in the interview, which was mainly about Perot's dislike of John McCain:
1. The tiny Texan is still incredibly obsessed with the cause of America's Vietnam POWs, and his belief that we left men behind there. Back in 1992, I worked with Thomas Ferguson on a long investigative piece he wrote for The Nation called "The Lost Crusade of Ross Perot" (which unfortunately isn't available online). It's a long trip down thru the looking glass, if you want to understand Perot's deep dislike of people like McCain and the Bush family, but it's all bound up in his belief that the US covered up the abandonment of POWs, and CIA drug-running in Southeast Asia had something to do with it.
2. The guy actually believed the wacky emails going around about Barack Obama being a Muslim who refused to respect the Pledge of Allegiance, saying to Alter that he admired his eloquence but thought it "a little odd that we would be less concerned about his background than being a Mormon." He apparently was "pleasantly surprised" when Alter set him straight.
3. He's not done with us! Hooray. While he isn't planning to run for president again, he says he "will launch a Web site next month with plenty of the charts and graphs he made famous when explaining the deficit in 1992."
I, for one, can't wait.

Comments

Charts and Graphs!

While he isn't planning to run for president again, he says he "will launch a Web site next month with plenty of the charts and graphs he made famous when explaining the deficit in 1992." That's actually kind of exciting. For all his fascistic eccentricity I think Perot outlined a potentially powerful alternative model for a candidacy that no one has really bothered to take up since: he actually attempted to communicate substantive information on an adult level with voters. What a novel concept! At the time, this required massive resources to purchase large blocks of television for his campaign infomercials. 16 years later, it could be done by any candidate that cared to and distributed online for a relative pittance. Unfortunately, I find it likely that the consulting consensus has passed this model over (much as it's passed on the model of real decentralization/participation) as it's just too dang hard for these people to implement. Still, I hope for a day when rather than publishing thickly-written academic whitepapers into the oblivion of their "policy" section of their websites, candidates (or even articulate surrogates) make substantive presentations of their ideas available in a compelling video format. Maybe they could even do this with their strategies for winning and implementing their plans, engage the participatory cycle from their supporters. I mean, it's not as though any campaign's overall strategy is ever unknown to their opposition; but it is often obscure to their supporters. Let 'em in on the plan, and they'll do a heck of a lot more for you (and more effectively to boot). That would generate quite a lot of buzz, I'll tell you. And it wouldn't even cost that much to do.