How Can Public Broadcasting Make a Real Difference in Election 2008
By stevegarfield, 04/24/2007 - 2:44pm

Andy Carvin writes from the NPR annual membership meeting:

...yesterday afternoon I got to facilitate a group discussion on how public broadcasting should use social media tools to engage the public during the 2008 election cycle... No matter what we do, we need to remember the election is about all of us, so all of us should have an opportunity to participate in public debate. An informed citizenry isn't achieved through lecturing to them, or only giving them a choice of partisan talking heads as the sole perspectives on a given issue . It's achieved by creating an ongoing, thoughtful conversation not beholden to soundbytes. To paraphrase Dan Gillmor, the public knows more about what's at stake than any single institution within public broadcasting ever could, and we need their help to make this conversation happen.

Andy provides examples of some projects that he thinks could take place during the election cycle and concludes with this:

Again, time is running out, and the stakes are high. This is an opportunity to public broadcasting to shine. We can't do it on our own, and we can't do it without public involvement. It's their civic duty, but it's ours as well. It's about all of us. Public broadcasters, community partners and the public working together. Our voice, our vote.

Good stuff.

Minnesota Has Great Examples

Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) already has a number of these tools, including citizen forums, blogs, and other "new media" that it integrates into its radio coverage.

-Aaron Street, Co-Director
Institute for Law and Politics
www.PoliticsLaw.org



© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |