Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Apple Stoops to “Whole New Level” of Self-Censorship in China

BY Jessica McKenzie | Friday, October 4 2013

Apple silently removed OpenDoor, an app that helped users evade China's Great Firewall, without any explanation and, the app developer says, without any just reason. Chinese netizens are understandably angry and many are criticizing Apple for their willingness to cooperate with Chinese authorities.

The lead developer of OpenDoor, who remains anonymous, told Radio Netherlands that on July 11, downloads of their app in China dropped from approximately 2,000 a day to zero. Apple did not respond to repeated requests for information until August 28, when they informed OpenDoor their app “includes content that is illegal in China.”

A Chinese Internet expert, who also remained anonymous to protect the future of his own iOS app, which he recently submitted to the Apple app store, told Radio Netherlands that he was “truly outraged” by that assertion.

OpenDoor is a browser app that sends traffic through its own servers to avoid using the user's ISP, which may have blocks on content. It contains no more illegal material than Safari or Google Chrome, as OpenDoor pointed out in an email to Apple: “It is unclear to us how a simple browser app could include illegal contents, since it's the user’s own choosing of what websites to view. Using the same definition, wouldn't all browser apps, including Apple's own Safari and Google's Chrome, include illegal contents?

The Internet expert explained that Apple's decision “meant Apple was starting to comply with orders without any legal basis, not even the pretense of legal basis.”

Some online commentators chalk it up to Apple's desire for a piece of the Chinese market. The BBC reports that one user wrote, "Apple is determined to have a share of the huge cake which is the Chinese internet market. Without strict self-censorship, it cannot enter the Chinese market."

Apple has removed other apps from its store in China because of content “illegal in China,” including a news app for the New Tang Dynasty, a U.S.-based television broadcaster founded by the banned spiritual group, Falun Gong, and an app for reading banned books about Tibet.

The Internet expert who spoke with Radio Netherlands pointed out that those apps were notified when they were removed from the store, and that there is “legal precedent,” however problematic, in which Falun Gong and Tibet-related material is prohibited.

The silent way Apple removed OpenDoor has the Internet expert convinced that they took “down content because of a phone call from the officials.”

Personal Democracy Media is grateful to the Omidyar Network and the UN Foundation for their generous support of techPresident's WeGov section.

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.

GO

wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.

GO

The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.

GO

tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.

GO

Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.

GO

monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.

GO

More