Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Questions of Privacy, Politics and Murder in Lebanon Text-Message Row

BY Lisa Goldman | Wednesday, December 19 2012

“If you think you understand Lebanese politics, it hasn’t been explained properly.” – A popular Lebanese saying.

During the first week of December, the Daily Star Lebanon, an English-language broadsheet published in Beirut, reported that the telecoms minister had refused a request from the Internal Security Forces (ISF) for over 3.7 million mobile phone users’ text messages.

The ISF needed the text messages for the period September 13-November 10, 2012, they said, in order to facilitate their investigation into the assassination of Brigadier General Wissam al-Hassan, who headed the ISF’s Information Branch, more informally known as the Intelligence branch.

Al-Hassan died in a massive car bombing outside an upscale shopping mall in the predominantly Christian Achrafieh area of Beirut on October 19, 2012.

Minister Senhaoui told the Daily Star that he refused to hand over the text messages out of concern for the privacy of Lebanese citizens:

“It violates the Constitution and the law,” he said. “Should we tell the Lebanese that we have suspended the Constitution and abolished their freedoms?” he asked. “Not a single country in the word would accept [the approval of such a request],” he added.

In addition to privacy issues, Senhaoui told the Star he was concerned that the person or group that controls the data “will control the country.”

Senhaoui’s sentiments on privacy are valid and laudable, but Lebanese politics is unusually complex and motivations are not always clear.

The current government is a multi-party coalition dominated by Hezbollah, the Shi’a party headed by Hassan Nasrallah, and the Free Patriotic Movement, with the latter headed by General Michel Aoun. This coalition, often referred to as the March 8 Alliance, is vaguely allied with Bashar Al-Assad’s regime in Syria, which occupied most of Lebanon from 1976 until 2005.

The opposition March 14 Alliance is named for the date in 2005 when hundreds of thousands of anti-Syrian Lebanese converged in Beirut for a peaceful protest called the Cedar Revolution, ultimately forcing the Syrians to withdraw their military presence from Lebanon. The 2005 protests were sparked by the assassination of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, who opposed Syria’s presence in Lebanon.

A 2011 Canadian television documentary called Who Killed Rafik Hariri? offers compelling evidence that the ISF had gathered sufficient data to prove Hezbollah’s direct involvement in the assassination.

Brigadier General Wissam Al-Hassan was supposed to have been traveling with Hariri when the powerful roadside bomb that killed the prime minister exploded, leaving a massive crater on one of Beirut’s major roads. But the intelligence officer had taken the day off, which some thought was suspicious. Al-Hassan was regarded as an active supporter of the March 14 movement — i.e., an opponent of Syria and thus of Hezbollah, but now some suspected he was secretly allied with the March 8 Coalition.

Others posit that he was assassinated by Hezbollah for his involvement in the investigation of the Hariri assassination.

Ayham Kamel, a London-based Middle East analyst with the Eurasia Group, says he has not seen any evidence to support the theory that Hezbollah was behind the assassination of Wissam Al-Hassan. But by requesting the mobile text messages, the ISF creates the impression that it has evidence implicating Hezbollah and its allies. Tacitly, they are implying that if the government refused the request it must have something to hide.

“In the past,” explained Kamel, “Violations of privacy in the name of security were not questioned by the March 14 coalition and its supporters. But now, with Aoun and Hezbollah in the government, they have issues with invasion of privacy — and this gets a lot of traction. It’s popular with their supporters, but also with many other factions. The attitude now is that the security service can have some access, but not unfettered access.”

Both arguments, said Kamel, have merit. Certainly this was “not a straightforward debate” — both sides were spinning and both had their own agendas.

“But the privacy and security issues are legitimate and this is not purely a political issue,” he summed up.

Personal Democracy Media is grateful to the Omidyar Network for its generous support of techPresident's WeGov section.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

NYC Open Data Advocates Focus on Quality And Value Over Quantity

The New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications plans to publish more than double the amount of datasets this year than it published to the portal last year, new Commissioner Anne Roest wrote last week in an annual report mandated by the city's open data law, with 135 datasets scheduled to be released this year, and almost 100 more to come in 2015. But as preparations are underway for City Council open data oversight hearings in the fall, what matters more to advocates than the absolute number of the datasets is their quality. GO

Civic Tech and Engagement: Announcing a New Series on What Makes it "Thick"

Announcing a new series of feature articles that we will be publishing over the next several months, thanks to the support of the Rita Allen Foundation. Our focus is on digitally-enabled civic engagement, and in particular, how and under what conditions "thick" digital civic engagement occurs. What we're after is answers to this question: When does a tech tool or platform enable actual people to make ongoing and significant contributions to each other, to a place or cause, at a scale that produces demonstrable change? GO

monday >

Tweets2Rue Helps Homeless to Help Themselves Through Twitter

While most solutions to homelessness focus on addressing physical needs -- a roof over the head and food to eat -- one initiative in France known as Tweets2Rue knows that for the homeless, a house is still not a home, so to speak: the homeless are often entrenched in a viscous cycle of social isolation that keeps them invisible and powerless. GO

Oakland's Sudo Mesh Looks to Counter Censorship and Digital Divide With a Mesh Network

In Oakland, a city with deep roots in radical activism and a growing tech scene at odds with the hyper-capital-driven Silicon Valley, those at the Sudo Room hackerspace believe that the solution to a wide range of problems, from censorship to the digital divide, is a mesh net, a type of decentralized network that is resilient to censorship and disruption and can also bring connectivity to poor communities.

GO

More