Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

In Japanese Social Media, No Political Opinions During Election Cycle

BY Julia Wetherell | Monday, December 17 2012

Candidates at a live-streamed debate in November (screengrab from Global Voices)

As the Japanese general election came to a close yesterday, with the Liberal Democratic Party returning to control of the Diet in a landslide victory against the Democratic Party of Japan, it’s worth noting that the nation’s electorate made their choice without being allowed to express political opinions on social media.

Japanese election law bans citizens from publicly endorsing any political party, an edict that holds in the Internet era. Political candidates, in turn, are limited to a bizarrely narrow scope of publicity that allows for the distribution of paper leaflets but prohibits the publication of photos or written documents as advertisement, including on Twitter or Facebook (online pop-up political ads are apparently a loophole, as Global Voices reported).

In spite of these limitations on political discourse, social media has still played an unprecedented role in this year’s election, with Twitter and Google+ vying for Japan’s eyes as the country’s premier election platform. Japan’s first live-streamed debate was held on the popular video-sharing site Nico Nico Douga in late November; real-time viewer commentary from Twitter was broadcast on giant screens behind the candidates. On Friday, a series of Google Hangouts with candidates aimed to give citizens an opportunity for discussion with their political leaders. It also served as a high-profile showing for Google’s social platform, which lags behind Twitter in Japan. A special Google-hosted election website has been providing information to voters throughout the cycle.

Politicians and candidates have expressed frustrations with the campaign laws, including Osaka mayor Toru Hashimoto, who took to Twitter with a questionably-legal outcry against “stupid and formal rules based on ceremony.” The laws have been in place since the 1950s, when they aimed to level the playing field by taking an advantage away from well-funded candidates. Any application to electronic media has been based purely on interpretation of a document that includes no amendment on the Internet.

Personal Democracy Media is grateful to the Omidyar Network for its generous support of techPresident's WeGov section.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

First POST: Mugs

No surprise here, but email list open rates are down; the real reason campaigns want to send you a free bumper sticker; Hillary Clinton wasn't alone in dodging inquiries from the House Oversight Committee about private email accounts; organizing opt-outs from high-stakes testing on Facebook; and much, much more. GO

wednesday >

First POST: Edges

Let the White House know what you think about the new homepage; why Democrats need a competitive primary to maintain their edge in political tech; California Highway Patrol reminded to not talk about how they track political protesters on social media; and much, much more. GO

tuesday >

First POST: Anomalies

Rallying uncommitted voters under a centrist umbrella; a defense of aggregation for a positive-sum Internet; UK says no to ban on killer robots; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: In It To Win It

Hillary Clinton's updated Twitter bio; lots of election data-porn, if you're into that kind of thing; the debate over digital keys and backdoors; protests by hologram; and much, much more. GO

More