A SOPA That Advocates Say Won't Kill the Internet
BY Miranda Neubauer | Friday, December 2 2011
There was some movement yesterday in the debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA.
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and others have backed an alternative proposal that would move the power to respond to piracy on foreign sites to the International Trade Commission from the Attorney General and the courts. As Ars Technica notes, "Website blocking by ISPs and DNS providers is not part of the plan, nor would search engines or others be required to remove links to such content."
The Sunlight Foundation* highlighted that traditional big media firms have contributed more than $5 million to the supporters of the bill such as Reps. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Meanwhile, in National Review, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) wrote a piece supporting the original legislation. Sunlight notes that Smith has also received $392,995 from large media corporations.
As Search Engine Land notes, a federal district court judge in Nevada acted as if SOPA were already law, when he ordered recently that Google, Bing, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter and others "de-index" the domain names of hundreds of websites that luxury goods maker Chanel alleges sell counterfeit versions of its products.
While Mathew Ingram from GigaOm wonders whether Google, Facebook, Apple and Twitter are becoming the new information gatekeepers with their current and possibly future ability to control access to content, Stephen Colbert heard from both sides of the debate yesterday as he spoke with music manager Danny Goldberg and Harvard Internet law professor Jonathan Zittrain.
Disclosure: Personal Democracy Media's Micah Sifry and Andrew Rasiej are senior advisers to the Sunlight Foundation.