Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Obama's Online Ad Spend Approached $8 Million

BY Kate Kaye | Friday, November 7 2008

(Crossposted from ClickZ)

If a recent online political ad revenue prediction is correct, President-elect Barack Obama's campaign could account for at least half of all 2008 online political ad spending. The winning candidate's campaign shelled out nearly $8 million through October to Google, Yahoo, Facebook, news Web sites, ad networks, and in-game ad firm Massive.

Obama Spend-O-MeterGoogle remains the clear winner of Obama's Web spoils, though the search giant's payments for October have yet to appear in the campaign's Federal Election Commission filings. The company collected $3.5 million from Obama for America, according to the latest FEC reports analyzed by ClickZ News. Keeping with a trend established early this year, Yahoo remains a distant second, having garnered around $673,000 from the campaign. A total of $7.97 million was spent on Web ads in '08 through October by the campaign, according to FEC reports.

Borrell Associates predicts spending online by 2008 political advertisers to hit $17.7 million. Earlier political ad forecasts indicate online ad spending will total as much as $110 million.

Notably, the campaign spent over half a million dollars on social networking sites. Facebook has scored the lion's share, taking in over $467,000 -- $370,000 of which was spent in September alone. Community Connect, publisher of, got around $61,000 from the campaign, which ran display ads on the site, and had a featured profile of the candidate on the social network's homepage. Early in the year the campaign spent a small amount -- $11,500 -- on MySpace, but expenditures paid to Myspace soon disappeared from Obama's FEC reports.

Reaching out to blacks on the Web was clearly an important component of the campaign's strategy. In addition to running ads on, almost $138,000 was spent on The messages in the ads targeting blacks, however, do not appear to have been any different from other Obama ads seen across the Web. Throughout most of the year, the campaign urged Web users to "Join Us," the goal being to get them to sign up to receive e-mail or text messages, donate money, attend events or volunteer. Before primaries and the general election, ads promoted voter registration and early voting, and suggested voters click through to find their local polling place.

Although the majority of ads bought by the Obama camp were served by online ad networks, several publishers sold ads directly to the campaign. Time Warner (most likely grabbed the biggest direct buy, totaling over $337,000 by October. Politico also did relatively well, collecting $146,000. took in $100,000.

Site publishers that sold ad space direct to the campaign weren't all news and politics focused, though. The Weather Channel Interactive, a geo-targeting no-brainer, received over $108,000 from the campaign. Another somewhat unexpected recipient of Obama's abundant ad spend was, which collected about $21,000 in September, just in time for pro basketball training season.

Ad networks, however, enabled a great deal of performance-based ad buys for the campaign, allowing it to target potential voters based on location, demographics, interests, and possibly previous Web behavior. More than $600,000 was paid to a variety of networks throughout the year, including AOL's, Collective Media, Undertone Networks, Burst Media, Quigo, DrivePM, Pulse360, Specific Media, and online video networks Broadband Enterprises and Tremor Media.

The ability to target ads locally is important to any political candidate using any medium, but Obama's campaign took local targeting to a new level. Before several state primaries, and then again before the general election, the campaign customized online ad creative for residents of different states. During the primaries, display ads with tailored messages showed up on news sites in Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and others. Later in the year, a variety of state-specific ads appeared, telling people to "Register to Vote for Barack Obama and Other Candidates For Change," and providing the last day they could register in their state in order to vote.

In addition to targeting geographically through ad networks, the ads showed up on local sites through firms specializing in local media. Centro, a local media buying firm, handled many of these local TV and newspaper site buys, taking in close to $630,000 by October. Cox, which offers digital local media, received $100,000 in October.

One online buy that piqued interest outside ad industry circles was Obama's in-game advertising buy in October. The campaign placed ads pushing an early voting message in EA games, including a racing game called "Burnout Paradise," targeting them to players in 10 battleground states. According to a recent FEC report, the campaign paid Microsoft-owned in-game ad network Massive $44,465 in October, probably for those very ads. The Obama camp also spent around $250,000 with Microsoft itself during the year, most likely for MSN search advertising.

Senator John McCain's presidential campaign has not broken out individual online ad expenditures in its FEC reports.

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.