Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Some White House Petitions Are Still Unanswered More Than a Year After Earning a Response [UPDATED]

BY Micah L. Sifry | Tuesday, August 13 2013

Since the launch of the White House's "We the People" e-petition site, 232 petitions have met their signature thresholds, which are supposed to trigger an official response from the administration. So far, 202 of those have been responded to, in an average of 61 days. Of the 30 unanswered petitions, the average wait time is a whopping 240 days, or eight months.

These delightful facts have been surfaced by Eli Dourado, a research fellow at the Mercatus Center of George Mason University. He built his new transparency site, WHPetitions.info, "because the list of successful petitions that are awaiting a reply seems like a glaring omission from the We The People site."

As he notes, "We The People displays petitions that are accumulating signatures, and it shows responses to petitions, but in between there is a purgatory into which petitions that the White House doesn't want to answer can disappear. My site tries to remedy that. Hopefully by showing the average time that the pending petitions have been waiting for an answer, I can nudge the White House to stay on top of their petition queue."

At the top of the list of long-unanswered petitions are ones that ask that all genetically modified foods be labeled; request an end to discrimination in the military against non-religious service members; seek to block the FDA from regulating "premium cigars"; and ask for final standards for gluten-free food labeling. Several ask the administration to wade into foreign policy disputes, such as a Japan-Korea tussle over some islands, or the tension between those two countries over Japan's abuse of "comfort women" during WWII.

Interestingly, since the White House raised the threshold for a response from 25,000 to 100,000 signatures, several hot topics have cleared that higher mark. Among them: a call to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group; a call to pardon Edward Snowden, a call to allow Tesla Motors to sell directly to consumers in all fifty states.

WHPetitions.info is built using the new We the People API.

Last year, Dourado built WCITLeaks with his colleague Jerry Brito to bring transparency to the International Telecommunication Union. He says, "Promoting transparency is a good way to get government officials to do what they know they should be doing anyway."

UPDATE: White House spokesman Matt Lehrich had this to say about WHPetitions.info: "We the People allows Americans – for the first time ever – to petition the White House directly for responses on the issues they care about. Every petition that crosses the threshold is reviewed and receives a response. As the site notes, we do our best to respond to petitions that cross the signature threshold as quickly as possible, however, depending on the topic and the overall volume of petitions, response times vary. We welcome continued engagement from citizens using this important tool as well as from developers taking advantage of the API we have provided to foster open access to data about We the People."

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.

GO

wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.

GO

The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.

GO

tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.

GO

Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.

GO

monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.

GO

More