Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Airbnb is Disruptive, But Is It Getting "Creepy" Now, Too?

BY Sam Roudman | Monday, June 3 2013

Airbnb, already under fire from regulators and the hotel industry its business model is shaking up, might be in for some flak from its own customers, too.

Airbnb is a quintessential industry disruptor. By allowing people worldwide to list and book their own apartments for short term rentals, the company effectively undercut the hotel industry. Since its launch in 2008, the platform’s use has exploded, and the company is now dealing with growing pains as its transitions from insurgent to institution. Those pains include a dispute over $1.8 million in transient occupancy taxes in its home city of San Francisco, and despite helping to house displaced New Yorkers after Hurricane Sandy, a recent New York ruling against one Airbnb renter — based on a 2011 law that prohibits renting apartments to guests for less than 29 days — that has other Airbnb hosts worried they might be next. The regulatory headbutting stemming from Airbnb’s endaround of the hotel industry’s supremacy (and the regulations which govern it) is not so different from that faced by transportation disruptors like Uber.

But now some Airbnb users say the company is not only disrupting an industry, but also their privacy. The point of contention is a new user verification program called Verified ID. According to Airbnb:

Verified ID provides a connection between the online and offline spaces. Airbnb users can earn a 'Verified ID' badge on their profile by providing their online identity (via existing Airbnb reviews, LinkedIn, or Facebook) and matching it to offline ID documentation, such as confirming personal information or scanning a photo ID. The name provided by both channels must match for verification to succeed ...

Airbnb will require a random 25% of users in the USA to go through the Verified ID process. Soon, we’ll expand this requirement to users around the world. We hope that hosts and guests worldwide will see the benefits of interacting with users who complete Verified ID. Our goal is for all Airbnb members to have Verified ID eventually.

Verification! Validation! These sound like great and necessary things for a business predicated on strangers engaging in a financial transaction to enter and stay in each other’s apartments. But according to comments from angry Airbnb users compiled by Doc Searls, an internet scholar and author of The Intention Economy, the new requirements leave much to be desired:

"Banks lose customer data all the time and they have some of the most stringent standards possible. Despite that, you pretend that you all are immune. You claim that having people send some of their most personal information over the internet will make them safer. You don’t make them safer; you make them MUCH LESS SAFE."

"There is just no way I’m linking up my Facebook account so you can datamine my friends, keep an eye on my day to day activity, or examine my relationships. There are enough safetychecks on me through the relationship we’ve already developed. Please reconsider this stupidity."

"This is ABSURD. If they want to offer this, then fine. But let the users decide how much they’re sharing and let hosts decide what they need."

If you don't happen to be able to verify through LinkedIn or Facebook, your privacy takes a hit elsewhere. Doc Searls' wife found that out when she emailed Airbnb telling them that she didn’t have a Facebook or LinkedIn account. Airbnb's response:

"If you’re unable to verify your online ID using Facebook or LinkedIn, or if your account does not automatically satisfy the online ID requirements, you can create a video profile to serve as an alternative.
Your video will be visible on your profile as a live introduction of yourself to other Airbnb community members."

Searls thinks video verification is a decidedly nonstandard practice.

"Requiring that a current or prospective customer login with Facebook or Linkedin, and then submit a video of themselves if those options aren't available, is not only far outside the norms of ID verification, but excludes a great many perfectly good customers," he says. A commenter on Airbnb was more succinct, calling the policy "creepy."

In response to questions about these criticisms of its policy, an Airbnb spokesman referred to a post on Airbnb's Nerd Blog by engineer Naseem Hakim.

"Things could have been explained better, and we’ll do a better job explaining why we ask for certain information going forward," says Hakim in the post. "We believe that reducing anonymity will ultimately create better Airbnb experiences. But we also acknowledge that the product is not finished — it needs improvement."

He goes on to apologize for bugs in the system, which mistakenly asked for the enhanced ID measures from some longtime users with many reviews (like Joyce Searls). He calls the video profiles a "temporary, stopgap solution," and says Airbnb plans on allowing users to keep their video profiles private, accessible only to Airbnb's verification staff.

The uproar highlights the challenges newly giant tech companies face as they try to secure and stabilize their newfound success while completing the overthrow of entrenched competitors. A commenter on Ycombinator sums up Airbnb's conundrum as such:

"Airbnb's concept, however wonderful it may be when it does work, is full of practical and legal holes which are now beginning to emerge. The big question is: can Airbnb close those holes without significantly reducing the usefulness of their service?"

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.