Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Is New York City The Best Place In the World For Open Data? We Find Out March 7

BY Miranda Neubauer | Friday, February 22 2013

City Council discretionary funding, 2009-2013, built on city data. Source: Gothamist

Last year, the New York City Council passed a bill touted as a groundbreaking step forward for open data that would make New York a leader among 21st-century cities. On March 7, city officials will have their first chance to show whether they're up to the challenge.

The legislation requires city agencies to consolidate, by March 7, the data they release online in a single web portal. By September, the city must submit a compliance plan setting a timeline for when agencies can make additional data sets available. Agencies have until December 31, 2018, to either finish publishing all of the data that's already available to the public in other forms or explain why data sets cannot be made available. The city must also post an annual update to its compliance plan starting in July 2014 until all public data sets have been made available. The law goes further than previous legislation by requiring agencies to do so rather than making it optional, but not that much further — there's no penalty for agencies that don't comply.

Advocates say the law is groundbreaking because it codifies the concept of open data into the city's administrative code — the idea that a 21st-century city should communicate in a 21st-century way in the name of collaboration and transparency.

"I think there are many people within the city who are trying to meet the spirit of the law," said John Kaehny, executive director of the transparency group Reinvent Albany. "Will every agency have every data set on the website in machine-readable format [by March 7]? No, probably not, but there's enough clear activity for it to be very encouraging."

City Councilwoman Gale Brewer, who spearheaded last year's legislation, explained that she had been part of regular meetings between a coalition of good government and technology groups and the city Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications, or DoITT.

Called the the New York City Transparency Working Group, the coalition — of advocacy organizations such as Citizens Union, Common Cause NY, League of Women Voters, NYPIRG, and Reinvent Albany, and technology groups such as Open Plans and Open NY Forum — was also instrumental in passing the bill, she said.

Officials inside the city are also talking to each other about how to make the bill work, said Kaehny, who is also co-chair of the Transparency Working Group.

"Most if not all agencies have data coordinators who have been working with DoITT," Kaehny said. "We're pretty encouraged."

Beyond the close circle of activists and officials, Kaehny said, the city established a wiki to get feedback from members of the public about the city's existing Socrata open data platform and about technical standards the city is also required to establish under the new law.

Activists are also planning to use the first March 7 deadline to drum up interest in open data from community boards, the city's 52 unpaid advisory panels comprising appointed community leaders, and other neighborhood organizations. The idea, at least from their perspective, is to try to get neighborhood leaders as excited about what the city is going to release as the city officials who are releasing it.

"We're pretty impressed with the culture within DoITT." Kaehny said. "All the law does is set technical standards to help support that culture. It can't impose a new culture, but it can help foster it. The next mayor has to continue to encourage that open government culture within city agencies."

But he added that more legislation would be necessary to create short-term incremental deadlines after March 7 and September of this year. He said that work has already begun with the City Council and parts of the administration to begin drafting an Open Data Law 2.0.

Brewer also said that she was interested in further legislation that would include information on city agencies' contacts with profit and-nonprofit vendors.

The city's implementation of the open data law may have been delayed by the winter storm Sandy as senior officials turned their attention to disaster response, but Mayor Michael Bloomberg has signaled an interest in making open data a focus of his remaining months in office.

In his recent State of the City address, Bloomberg said that the city's data analytics team will launch a new platform to improve how agencies share information. He said he would name Michael Flowers, director of analytics at the Office of Policy and Strategic Planning, as the city's first Chief Analytics Officer, and promised that he would "make as much of this data as possible public, so that the tech community can hold us accountable."

News Briefs

RSS Feed tuesday >

First POST: Company

The global "Snowden effect" is huge; how many consumer-facing online services fail the user privacy test; the Dems' 2016 digital to-do list; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Mood Slime

The Sony email leak reveals the MPAA's campaign against Google; how Uber is lobbying in local markets; mapping the #MillionsMarchNYC; and much, much more. GO

friday >

First POST: Cloudy

What the Internet is not; new analysis of public opinion on net neutrality; how cloud backup apparently foiled a police coverup; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Records

Is the future of citizen journalism vigilantism?; one tech mogul's vocal support for CIA torture; a cri de couer from the founder of the Pirate Bay; and much, much more. GO

Web Index Sees Impact of Net Neutrality, Surveillance and Copyright Laws

Denmark, Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have come out on top of the Web Index, a ranking of the Web Foundation measuring the economic, social and political benefit that countries gain from the web. The United States is at number six. For the authors of the report accompanying the index, the results reflect how inequality has an impact on access to the web. "Nordic policy-makers have been quick to adopt and promote the free Internet - and open access to information - as a 21st century public good," the report states. " Others, as this year's findings show, need to move fast to catch up." The report attributes the Scandinavian countries' advantage to the countries' broader efforts to invest in public goods and establish a welfare and acting against " excess concentrations of wealth and power." With the lower inequality in those countries than in others, "the skills, means and freedoms to benefit from new technologies are widespread, which helps to explain why Scandinavian countries score highly on the political, social and economic impact of the Web GO