Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

First POST: Moving Forward

BY Nick Judd | Thursday, December 20 2012

Where does the data go?

  • Obama for America 2008 veterans Jim Pugh and Nathan Woodhull argue that Obama for America needs to spin its software operation into a standalone support system for the entire progressive movement:

    An investment in building on these systems offers another possibility as well: providing access to the rest of the progressive movement. Right now, only presidential campaigns have the resources to build systems of this sophistication. The data and technology infrastructure from the Obama campaign cost millions of dollars to build, and even the most well-funded senate campaigns couldn't afford anything close to that.

    But with some additional work, the data and tech infrastructure from the Obama campaign could be adapted to offer the same functionality to other progressive candidates and groups, giving them the opportunity to use these systems with their own supporters and volunteers. For smaller campaigns that would have no chance of creating these systems on their own, this could be a game-changing step forward. And beyond the benefit to the Democratic Party and progressive movement, it could provide a path to fund the continued investment, via paid licensing from these outside campaigns and organizations.

    An idea we also heard floated at the progressive pow-wow Rootscamp, this would turn key pieces of OfA software into platform-esque technologies provided as a service by some new company or organization. The incoming license or consulting fees subsidizes the maintenance and development of the technology for the next four years. This is essentially the way Mark Sullivan and Steven Corey Adler started VAN, before Adler left and VAN merged with NGP: What began as a software product in a state-level race accrued attention and licensing deals from the Democratic Party; party officials developed a balance wherein the company owns the software and the party owns the data; and because of the way the arrangement works, the party establishment has a lot of say in who has easy access to the software and who doesn't.

After WCIT, the final tally

  • Conversations about how to run the Internet are ongoing, but U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer, who took the lead in the U.S. delegation to the World Conference on International Telecommunications, breaks down for The Hill what it looks like with the dust from Dubai finally settled:

    Eighty-nine member countries signed the treaty at the conference in Dubai. The U.S., U.K. and Canada refused to sign. Kramer said 55 nations, including the U.S., stated they would either not sign the treaty, or had reservations and needed to receive guidance from their governments before signing onto it.

    "I hardly call 89 nations out of 193 [member countries] broad consensus," Kramer said.

    The treaty will go into effect in Jan. 2015.

    In the short-term, the U.S. needs to keep engaging other countries, particularly English-speaking African countries and nations in Latin America, in the discussion about Internet governance, he said.

    "They're listening, they want to have a dialogue," Kramer said. "We need to be spending more time with those nations."

Just for you

  • A glimpse into the future: After watching women's health become a mobilizing force in online politics in 2012, the National Women's Law Center is building a 2013 strategy that uses Facebook to recruit new activists for what they predict will be another year of state-level attacks on women's access to reproductive health care. While national debates sometimes flare up in the media, state-level legislation is coming up for debate across the country but NWLC feels like it's flying under the radar. Can they use Internet activism to draw attention to the way they say women's rights are being curtailed, incrementally, in statehouses across the nation? Sarah Lai Stirland digs in.

The future of news?

  • Journalists are going gaga over the latest innovation from the New York Times, a longform feature about an avalanche that has been presented, perhaps for the first time, in a truly web-native way. The feature experiments with many of the tricks that designers have found most appealing about the emerging HTML5 and JavaScript standard, such as parallax scrolling, embedded video, and transition effects. It's a legitimately boundary-pushing experiment in storytelling and might say a thing or two about how stories will be presented online.

    But. BUT! It looks janky on techPresident's Android phone. Deprecate gracefully, guys!

A surprise to all open-government advocates we are sure

  • Toby Mendel, the executive director of Canada-based Centre for Law and Democracy, writes that the Open Government Partnership's credibility is at risk because its member countries have not taken sufficient steps to increase access to information.

Around the web

  • Data.gov may be moving to the open-source platform that powers India's open data hub. Developers from the U.S. and India developers built the open-source version of Data.gov as part of a bilateral agreement on open data announced in the run-up to the Open Government Partnership rollout.

  • Cory Booker is probably running for Senate, not the New Jersey governor's chair.

  • From us to you: Some of the names on the list of gun-control supporters belong to Silicon Valley notables who found themselves unusually activated by the fight against SOPA and PIPA at around this time last year.

  • Keep an eye on Utah, Politico's Jason Millman writes, as the development of its exchange will be a test of how flexible the Obama administration will be with states on the rollout of these new federally mandated marketplaces for health insurance.

  • Something completely different: The U.S. Census emails to note that North Dakota had the largest percent increase in population of any state this year, growing by 2.17 percent according to a Census Bureau state population estimate.

  • No, really, we're listening: Taking a page from the Obama playbook, the Democratic Party is out to its list with a survey seeking input on post-election priorities. Flagged for us by a Republican First POST reader.

  • Walkability watch: Bike Score, a website that scores neighborhoods based on ease of biking or walking, has expanded to new cities.

  • It begins: One senator is calling for a study on violence in video games.

  • A German state has demanded that Facebook allow use of pseudonyms on the site. CNET has more:

    The data protection agency Unabhaengiges Landeszentrum fuer Datenschutz (ULD) in the northern German state of Schleswig-Holstein has ordered Facebook to put a halt to its real name policy, citing a German law that allows people to use pseudonyms online. The agency pointed to that law as one that guarantees the "fundamental right to freedom of expression on the Internet."

News Briefs

RSS Feed tuesday >

First POST: Company

The global "Snowden effect" is huge; how many consumer-facing online services fail the user privacy test; the Dems' 2016 digital to-do list; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Mood Slime

The Sony email leak reveals the MPAA's campaign against Google; how Uber is lobbying in local markets; mapping the #MillionsMarchNYC; and much, much more. GO

friday >

First POST: Cloudy

What the Internet is not; new analysis of public opinion on net neutrality; how cloud backup apparently foiled a police coverup; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Records

Is the future of citizen journalism vigilantism?; one tech mogul's vocal support for CIA torture; a cri de couer from the founder of the Pirate Bay; and much, much more. GO

Web Index Sees Impact of Net Neutrality, Surveillance and Copyright Laws

Denmark, Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have come out on top of the Web Index, a ranking of the Web Foundation measuring the economic, social and political benefit that countries gain from the web. The United States is at number six. For the authors of the report accompanying the index, the results reflect how inequality has an impact on access to the web. "Nordic policy-makers have been quick to adopt and promote the free Internet - and open access to information - as a 21st century public good," the report states. " Others, as this year's findings show, need to move fast to catch up." The report attributes the Scandinavian countries' advantage to the countries' broader efforts to invest in public goods and establish a welfare and acting against " excess concentrations of wealth and power." With the lower inequality in those countries than in others, "the skills, means and freedoms to benefit from new technologies are widespread, which helps to explain why Scandinavian countries score highly on the political, social and economic impact of the Web GO

More