Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

MoveOn Bets Its Future On Volunteered Ideas

BY Sarah Lai Stirland | Wednesday, December 5 2012

MoveOn.org, which established the online activism model that revolutionized grassroots political organizing, is restructuring to adopt a way of working that's becoming ever more commonplace in the world of progressive politics.

The left-leaning group is moving to crowdsource organizing tactics from its 7.5 million e-mail list, and it's also looking to open up it to partnership organizations. In the process, it is shedding 15 staffers and changing its leadership. Justin Ruben, currently the group's executive director, will become the organization's board chair next year, and MoveOn.org staffer Anna Galland will succeed Ruben as executive director.

"The basic, top-level theory here is to move all our campaigning in the direction of bottom-up that is exemplified by SignOn.org," Ruben told techPresident. "It doesn’t mean that it’s all going to be SignOn, but the idea is, what are all of the different ways that we can help our members lead campaigns?"

SignOn.org is MoveOn's e-mail petition-signing tool, which includes instructions on how to start your own DIY grassroots political campaign to draw public attention to an issue.

Ruben gave an example of the organization's strategic change by pointing to its fight against state "voter suppression" laws. Under MoveOn's traditional model, the group's staff organizers would have built organizational coalitions and identified key states themselves. The new model relies on its members to come up with ideas, which MoveOn staffers would then push on a wider basis.

For example, a MoveOn member in Pittsburgh started a petition on SignOn.org during the election to persuade local election officials to not enforce Pennsylvania's photo ID law. MoveOn's staff thought that was a "great idea," Ruben said, and emailed its members in several other Pennsylvania counties to urge them to do the same to their local county elections officials.

In making the change, MoveOn is shifting to an organizational model that looks like a variation of Change.org's and other groups like the Corporate Action Network or Van Jones' Rebuild the Dream. In this model, expert organizers bring professional support behind momentum that originates with individual volunteer members, sometimes working with outside groups to amplify national and local campaigns.

Ruben said that MoveOn had been experimenting with the model over the past several years, and now had the confidence to go "whole hog" with it. TechPresident wrote about one of those partnership campaigns in early November when MoveOn members worked with the AFL-CIO's SuperPAC Workers Voice to canvas voters in swing states. Among other things, MoveOn members hosted 2,183 call parties and made more than 1.5 million phone calls.

"We definitely want to be a turbocharger for the whole progressive movement," Ruben said. "That includes groups, and it includes individuals, and we want to help people step into leadership, and we also want to work with allies."

Change.org earlier this year alienated some progressive organizers with its policy to accept advertising and business from groups whose values don't always align with theirs. For example, the group's relationship with Students First, which pushes policies that would weaken teachers' unions, upset many progressives.

Ruben said that the biggest difference between MoveOn.org's new model and Change.org is that SignOn.org won't accept payment for their partnership campaigns, and it won't accept advertising.

"If you come to MoveOn, if your thing strikes a chord, then we're going to tell them all about it, and help mobilize them all," he said.

Asked what MoveOn would do if faced with a situation like Change.org's, where progressives are split on an issue, Ruben said that it would survey its members for their opinions, and if they weren't united, MoveOn staffers would not work to push it.

"For things where the progressive movement is really divided, they can use our tools, but we're never going to pile on because our members are divided," he said.

In its new form, MoveOn will have a staff of about 30, and will keep its 75 regional membership-driven councils. Going forward, the difference is that those councils will work not just on election issues, but local issues as well.

The hope is that special interest groups will be able to band together across the country to work on specific issues. For example, Ruben said, small business owners on MoveOn's list could have organized events and petitions during the move to enact the Affordable Care Act rather than having MoveOn's organizers managing the event themselves.

Addressing the doubters on its new model, Ruben said in an e-mailed note:

"We will continue to play an influential role in national debates and believe this "bottom-up" approach strengthens our hand. Look at the fiscal showdown fight taking place right now -- MoveOn members across the country are creating petitions that share their personal stories and urge their elected officials to protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid."

That's powerful. Just this morning, we learned that Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa is collaborating with some of the folks who want to cut these programs. Under the old model, we might not have had capacity to engage, but in the new model, a MoveOn member who lives there created a petition, and we're already piling on."

Fix the Debt, a corporate group lobbying Congress on the fiscal cliff, announced Tuesday that Villaraigosa has joined its steering committee. The group is primarily funded by Republicans, and is looking to make cuts to government benefits programs.

So far, the petition asking the Mayor to resign from the group has received 3,576 signatures.

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.

GO

wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.

GO

The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.

GO

tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.

GO

Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.

GO

monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.

GO

More