Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

As Countries Meet Over New Telco Regulations, Worry Grows Among Internet Activists

BY Nick Judd and Miranda Neubauer | Monday, December 3 2012

Fully operational: Will WCIT spell the end of the ad-hoc Internet? Photo: Michael Wifall

Open-Internet advocates group blasted the International Telecommunications Union Monday as the U.N. agency opens several days of discussion on changes to international telecommunications regulations that might make it part of the structure of Internet governance.

Advocacy group Fight for the Future on Monday launched "Stop the Internet Coup", an appeal to prevent "a panel of governments, giant corporations, and dictatorships" from having "absolute power over the entire Internet, deciding in secret what you can see & do online." This is the latest round of public worrying over the World Conference on International Telecommunications, beginning today in Dubai, in which ITU member nations renegotiate the terms of telecommunications regulations for the first time since 1988. Other anti-ITU advocacy includes a Google-backed Twitter initiative and a make-your-own video campaign from the Mozilla Foundation. Fight for the Future repeats claims about what the ITU itself wants to do that the ITU's secretary-general, Hamadoun Touré, has already called "ridiculous."

While advocates paint WCIT as the potential death knell of Internet freedom, experts suggest the real conversation in Dubai will be about the possibility of a fee structure on international Internet traffic — which could be described as a global attack on net neutrality and worthy of serious debate all on its own.

The advocates' pitch, then, might at first sound like some combination of the Agenda 21 conspiracy theorists and the beardo libertarian open-source crowd after a long night snorting bath salts. Fight for the Future's Tiffiniy Cheng says all the fuss is warranted because they're not attacking the ITU of today. Instead, they're trying to defend the Internet from the monster she says the U.N. regulatory agency could become.

The International Telecommunications Union's member countries will consider proposed changes to a series of regulations that govern things like international satellite and landline phone traffic. These regulations don't encroach very far into the workings of the Internet, but that might change over the next couple of days. Member countries like Russia and China are bringing proposals that would afford governments increased control over content on the Internet within their borders and have proposed changes that would shift functional control of the Internet within the grasp of their states, putting free-speech advocates ill at ease. Countries forwarded along their proposals to the ITU ahead of the conclave, many of which remain secret, and the union's attempts to appease civil society institutions who have criticized the union's lack of transparency have not been successful.

"Only governments have a vote at the ITU," Google says in a statement, "and some of them are trying to use a closed-door meeting in December to increase regulation online. Some proposals could permit governments to censor legitimate speech -- or even cut off Internet access altogether. Although the ITU has helped the world manage radio spectrum and telephone networks, it is the wrong place to make decisions about the future of the Internet."

Those proposals certainly are up for debate. But U.S. Ambassador Philip Verveer, coordinator for International Communications and Information Policy at the State Department, says they have little chance of passing.

"As a formal matter, like all U.N. organizations, it's one country one vote," Verveer told techPresident. "But in fact that's not what happens. The ITU operates on the basis of consensus. It assiduously avoids taking votes," he said.

The chairman of the conference, Mohammed Al Ghanim, is director general of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of the United Arab Emirates and is "very widely respected," Verveer said. Al Ghanim will be responsible for taking the temperature of conference delegates on each measure.

"If there are strong objections from very many countries, something cannot be adopted," Verveer explained.

The U.S. is of the position that strong objections will emerge against any proposal to shift day-to-day Internet governance away from the bottom-up, ad-hoc network of institutions and individuals that keep things going now.

More likely — and also opposed by the American delegation — is the institution of telco-style termination fees abroad. Under these fee structures, Google and other Western companies might have to pay Internet service providers — like, say, the state-run telcos that enjoy monopolies in some Arab and African states — in other countries to deliver their content. Goodbye, net neutrality: to reach growing audiences — and to work with content creators — in the developing world, companies like YouTube could be asked to pay ISPs for the use of their bandwidth.

For instance, the Canadian Internet legal scholar Michael Geist notes that the European Telecommunications Network Operators Association, a group of 41 telecom companies, "has proposed a new sender pay model for Internet traffic so that its members receive 'fair compensation.'"

Verveer told techPresident that the U.S. delegation is opposed to this type of scheme, too.

ITU Secretary-General Hamadoun Touré told Reuters that due to these divergences of opinion, the ITU's final agreement will likely resemble a general agreement to cooperate more and share best practices, such as on how to combat child pornography.

"From Dubai, what I personally expect is to see some kind of principles saying cyberspace is a global phenomenon and it can only have global responses," Touré told Reuters. "I just intend to put down some key principles there that will lay the seeds for something in the future."

Seeds, to Fight for the Future and its allies, of the creeping ivy that might tear down the Internet as we know it. As soon as the ITU gets a say in the principles of the Internet, their thinking goes, the problems begin: A machine kept going by an adhocracy of engineers and users operating in the open, they say, must suddenly tolerate the grinding gears of a bureaucracy where decisions are made by political appointees reaching consensus behind closed doors.

"Who gets to set policy, and where these discussions happen, is an on-going debate in Internet governance," Emma Llanso, of the Center for Democracy and Technology, wrote in a message Cheng forwarded to techPresident, "but a move to give ITU explicit oversight, even in the form of 'establishing a framework' for discussion or formally encouraging/supporting Member State cooperation, would begin the process of having the ITU and Member State governments set the policy agenda in a venue that is government-driven and government-controlled."

In contrast, she wrote, the current system "acknowledges that sound Internet policy and governance is developed through the participation not of governments alone, but of technical experts, human rights advocates, industry, academics, and users."

That even applies to technology standards, Llanso wrote. There are proposals on the table that would give study groups within the International Telecommunications Union a voice equal to that of the Internet Engineering Task Force and the World Wide Web Consortium, the organizations that now develop the standards that govern everything from what tags are used in HTML code to the right protocol for managing the network data packets at the core of Internet communications. When IETF or W3C issue a standard, it is public long before it is even seriously considered for adoption, and its use is voluntary. In contrast, the ITU could conceivably walk away from Dubai having required member states to adopt standards developed inside its bureaucratic walls with minimal public input, Llanso wrote.

The Internet's creation myth frames it as the brainchild of a few innovative engineers and scientists, a combination of ingenuity and a government that offered funding support but little interference. As WCIT continues in Dubai, Cheng and other Internet advocates hope other countries are as willing to keep their hands off as the United States seems to be.

"We're working to make sure any closed agency made up of governments shouldn't have a legitimate governance voice over the internet," Cheng wrote to techPresident in an email. "If ITU, which is governed by government bureacrats, were to have international authority over questions of internet regulations, then future proposals that are legitimized by the ITU could bring cover to dictatorships and wealthy telcos who agree with the future proposals."

This post has been updated.

News Briefs

RSS Feed today >

Brazilian President Signs Internet Bill of Rights Into Law at NetMundial

Earlier today Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff sanctioned Marco Civil, also called the Internet bill of rights, during the global Internet governance event, NetMundial, in Brazil.


tuesday > Reboots As a Candidate Digital Toolkit That's a Bit Too Like launched with big ambitions and star appeal, hoping to crack the code on how to get millions of people to pool their political passions through their platform. When that ambition stalled, its founder Nathan Daschle--son of the former Senator--decided to pivot to offering political candidates an easy-to-use free web platform for organizing and fundraising. Now the new is out from stealth mode, entering a field already being served by competitors like NationBuilder, Salsa Labs and And strangely enough, seems to want its early users to ask for help. GO

Armenian Legislators: You Can Be As Anonymous on the 'Net As You Like—Until You Can't

A proposed bill in Armenia would make it illegal for media outlets to include defamatory remarks by anonymous or fake sources, and require sites to remove libelous comments within 12 hours unless they identify the author.


monday >

The Good Wife Looks for the Next Snowden and Outwits the NSA

Even as the real Edward Snowden faces questions over his motives in Russia, another side of his legacy played out for the over nine million viewers of last night's The Good Wife, which concluded its season long storyline exploring NSA surveillance. In the episode titled All Tapped Out, one young NSA worker's legal concerns lead him to becoming a whistle-blower, setting off a chain of events that allows the main character, lawyer Alicia Florrick (Julianna Margulies), and her husband, Illinois Governor Peter Florrick (Chris Noth), to turn the tables on the NSA using its own methods. GO

The Expanding Reach of China's Crowdsourced Environmental Monitoring Site, Danger Maps

Last week billionaire businessman Jack Ma, founder of the e-commerce company Alibaba, appealed to his “500 million-strong army” of consumers to help monitor water quality in China. Inexpensive testing kits sold through his company can be used to measure pH, phosphates, ammonia, and heavy metal levels, and then the data can be uploaded via smartphone to the environmental monitoring site Danger Maps. Although the initiative will push the Chinese authorities' tolerance for civic engagement and activism, Ethan Zuckerman has high hopes for “monitorial citizenship” in China.


The 13 Worst Bits of Russia's Current and Maybe Future Internet Legislation

It appears that Russia is on the brink of passing still more repressive Internet regulations. A new telecommunications bill that would require popular blogs—those with 3,000 or more visits a day—to join a government registry and conform to government-mandated standards is expected to pass this week. What follows is a list of the worst bits of both proposed and existing Russian Internet law. Let us know in the comments or on Twitter if we missed anything.


Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.