Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

New Code for America Project Seeks To 'MoneyBall' Criminal Justice System

BY Sarah Lai Stirland | Thursday, October 4 2012

Photo: Shutterstock

One of the more startling facts of life in the United States in 2012 is that crime rates are generally lower than they were in 1980, yet law enforcement authorities are jailing people at a far higher rate than they were three decades ago.

Criminal justice reform advocates point to the trend, and the fact that just under two thirds of county jail populations in America's 3,000 prisons are people merely awaiting trial as a sign that there's something deeply inefficient about the process of criminal law enforcement in the United States. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder noted in a speech last year that this system of mass incarceration is costing taxpayers $9 billion.

"The reality is that it doesn't have to be this way — almost all of these individuals could be released and supervised in their communities," he said.

A couple of new Code for America projects unveiled this week will seek to broach the issue under the leadership of city policymakers in Louisville, Kentucky and New York City. Former New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram, now a vice president at the non profit the Arnold Foundation in New York City will guide the effort.

Like a growing number of criminal justice reformers in the United States, Milgram believes that better data collection and statistical analysis could help local law enforcement officials make better, more rationale decisions — just as policymakers are doing in the fields of healthcare and businesspeople are doing in sports.

"The idea is to moneyball criminal justice, to pull together data from all these different sources, from all these different people, and to be able to figure out who’s doing what, what’s happening, and what types of applications can be created to make the system work better, work fairer, and reduce crime and be more efficient," she told a roomful of people at the Code for America Summit in San Francisco this week, referring to Michael Lewis' book about the economics of baseball and statistical analysis.

The subject of criminal justice reform is especially pertinent to cash-strapped states and counties, she noted, since prison spending forms one of the biggest part of state budgets.

The fellows have yet to be assigned, and the full details of how Milgram and New York and Kentucky will approach the issue have yet to be hashed out. But the idea is to formulate a systematic method of collecting verifiable and reliable information about the people who are arrested that can be analyzed to assess risk.

Milgram said that she first got the idea when she was New Jersey's attorney general. Her office had jurisdiction over the state's 9,500 person criminal enforcement system, and so she took regular meetings with local police. One of the towns that she dealt with was Camden, which was, and still is, known as the most dangerous city in America.

"When I got there, I was struck by the lack of data and technology," Milgram recalled. "What they had were yellow stickies: The captain in charge of homicide would stand up in meetings and hold up a yellow sticky and say: ‘Well, last week we had three homicides. Here are the addresses, we have no suspects.' And then the person sitting next to him in charge of robberies would say: 'Last week, we had 40 robberies, here are the locations, we have no suspects.'"

That’s not data — at least, it’s not data that can be used practically to fight crime. We changed that by using technology to convince the police department to not only collect the data, but also to use it"

In a follow-up interview, Milgram acknowledges that crime is still a serious problem in Camden, but she notes that the city has suffered severe cuts to its police force, which hobbled the effectiveness of her reforms.

A study from the non-profit group the Pretrial Justice Institute published earlier this year confirms Milgram's central thesis: The operations of local law enforcement are impenetrable because those local law enforcement authorities haven't gathered enough reliable data about the people that they arrest, and even when they do, they don't have the information technology to store and analyze the relevant information.

Milgram finds that incredible, given the amount of money that's being spent on putting people away.

"I’ve spent a lot of time over the past year talking with police chiefs, prosecutors, public defenders, courts, jails, prisons, probations officers and parole, and I’ve asked them: ‘Who’s in your system?’ What offenses are driving your system? How long are people staying? How long does it take for people to make bail? What’s the average amount of time that people are staying?' They can’t answer those questions," she said.

She hopes to begin to change this with her work at the Arnold Foundation, and Code for America. CfA's Founder and Executive Director Jennifer Pahlka acknowledges that the one-year program won't change the system overnight, but the goal is to establish a framework from which criminal justice reformers can move forward.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

NYC Open Data Advocates Focus on Quality And Value Over Quantity

The New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications plans to publish more than double the amount of datasets this year than it published to the portal last year, new Commissioner Anne Roest wrote last week in an annual report mandated by the city's open data law, with 135 datasets scheduled to be released this year, and almost 100 more to come in 2015. But as preparations are underway for City Council open data oversight hearings in the fall, what matters more to advocates than the absolute number of the datasets is their quality. GO

Civic Tech and Engagement: Announcing a New Series on What Makes it "Thick"

Announcing a new series of feature articles that we will be publishing over the next several months, thanks to the support of the Rita Allen Foundation. Our focus is on digitally-enabled civic engagement, and in particular, how and under what conditions "thick" digital civic engagement occurs. What we're after is answers to this question: When does a tech tool or platform enable actual people to make ongoing and significant contributions to each other, to a place or cause, at a scale that produces demonstrable change? GO

monday >

Tweets2Rue Helps Homeless to Help Themselves Through Twitter

While most solutions to homelessness focus on addressing physical needs -- a roof over the head and food to eat -- one initiative in France known as Tweets2Rue knows that for the homeless, a house is still not a home, so to speak: the homeless are often entrenched in a viscous cycle of social isolation that keeps them invisible and powerless. GO

Oakland's Sudo Mesh Looks to Counter Censorship and Digital Divide With a Mesh Network

In Oakland, a city with deep roots in radical activism and a growing tech scene at odds with the hyper-capital-driven Silicon Valley, those at the Sudo Room hackerspace believe that the solution to a wide range of problems, from censorship to the digital divide, is a mesh net, a type of decentralized network that is resilient to censorship and disruption and can also bring connectivity to poor communities.

GO

More