Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Planned Parenthood's Most Radical Response to Critics: To Listen, and Let Their Supporters Lead

BY Melissa Gira Grant | Thursday, May 3 2012

A pro-Planned Parenthood rally in St. Paul, Minn. in April. Photo: Fibonacci Blue

By the time news broke on Jan. 31 that Susan G. Komen for the Cure would cut funding to Planned Parenthood, the nonprofit was already prepared.

“We were anticipating that this was going to come out,” said Heather Holdridge, director of digital strategy at Planned Parenthood. "And we knew the Susan G. Komen has a lot of grassroots support, and we have a lot of shared support.”

What Planned Parenthood didn't anticipate was that their battle — nominally over a rules change at Komen that would see it cease funding breast cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood clinics — would spark a resurgent movement in women's health and reproductive rights activism. Beginning with the backlash against Komen, which occurred in large part online, activists won a string of victories. First, they were part of such pressure on Komen that leadership there was quickly forced to reverse its decision. And in several states, outcry grew against legislation that would mandate intrusive, medically unnecessary procedures in order to have an abortion.

Taken in aggregate, this didn't just mark a new victory for Planned Parenthood, the beleaguered standard-bearer for pro-choice politics. It also signaled a shift in the conversation about sexual and reproductive health from abortion to broader issues including breast cancer, contraception and preventive care. Owing in large part to the way social media can influence mainstream debate, as well as the work that grassroots reproductive rights activists have done to re-center the fight for reproductive rights on larger questions of economic and social justice, activists were able to put efforts to curtail access to abortion and birth control on the defensive.

Making a meme

Looking at the momentum that women's health advocates have built since February, some of them are asking if a new, Internet-savvy class of activists have shifted the balance of power in the ongoing fight between conservative groups fighting against access to birth control and abortion and progressive groups fighting to increase access to preventive care. And they're wondering if Internet activists can keep that momentum going.

Eesha Pandit, formerly director of advocacy at Raising Women's Voices and an editor at Feministing, started asking those questions after she saw a cartoon drawn by one activist on Feb. 1 get shared over 15,500 times on the popular microblogging service Tumblr.

“It was a very powerful commentary on women's healthcare more broadly,” said Pandit, “and that was a conversation that, in my experience in health reform organizing, that was really hard to get to – which would get subsumed in conversations about socialized medicine – and that came up really well in that image.”

When we spoke a few weeks after the Komen Foundation's decision to defund Planned Parenthood, she was watching for signs that this kind of hand-drawn activism would continue.

“I wonder where that bigger conversation has gone?" she asked. "And I wonder where that organizing will go.”

"Immediate, visceral, personal"

Those conversations began in early February, after the Associated Press reported that the Komen board had passed a rule prohibiting the foundation from giving grants to organizations under federal investigation. The rule seemed specifically aimed at Planned Parenthood, which attracted the public attention of one member of Congress, Florida Republican Cliff Stearns.

Heather Holdridge, Planned Parenthood's digital director, had prepared an email and Facebook post for the occasion. The nonprofit published those missives, she said, and "just started monitoring."

The response from Planned Parenthood's supporters was “immediate, visceral, and personal,” said Holdridge. “What we saw within, say, two hours –– and this happened on a Tuesday afternoon at 4 o'clock –– we had literally hundreds of comments on our Facebook wall. We had people going nuts, and the sentiment was almost universally, about 9 to 1 if not more, people were angry and upset that Komen had done this, asking us, 'Why did they do this, I don't understand.'”

Their supporters' anger moved quickly to Komen's own Facebook wall. “We didn't encourage it,” said Holdridge, “but people immediately started posting on their wall, too, saying, what's up?”

The outpouring of support (and rage) may have kicked off on Facebook, but it was fomenting on Twitter, too.

According to a Twitter spokeswoman, over the course of the next three days of the controversy, users posted 1.3 million tweets related to Komen and Planned Parenthood. The hashtag #standwithPP registered four million impressions, according to a tracking tool called Crowdbooster, a Planned Parenthood spokesman said.

Within 24 hours of Planned Parenthood's first public response to the Komen Foundation, a blog called Planned Parenthood Saved Me launched on Tumblr, the popular microblogging platform. The next night, Rachel Maddow read from the posts on her show.

The posts detail incredibly personal stories: broken condoms, financial struggles, abortion, cancer. When Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke fought and won the right to testify at a congressional hearing on birth control and commentator Rush Limbaugh called her a "slut" on national radio, they were engaging in a fight over what birth control is for — Fluke and others make the point that it is prescribed for a host of health concerns, including contraception — that heated up around this debate, weeks before the Capitol Hill hearings.

On Feb. 9, the tumblr's curator, Deanna Zandt, ran a post by an anonymous submitter who wrote that she was prescribed birth control as a means of suppressing uterine cysts:

When I went to pick up the prescription, it rang up at $80. For a one month supply. “What about insurance?” I asked. The heinous woman behind the counter said, as loudly and as self-righteously has she could, “insurance doesn’t cover BIRTH CONTROL!!!!” She didn’t say “you SLUT” but I know that she was thinking it.
There was no way I could afford to spend over $800 a year on this prescription. I was horrified by the way the woman spoke to me... Thankfully, someone, I don’t know who, told me that there was a Planned Parenthood on campus.

Stories like this changed the national conversation and kept Komen on the defensive — all without Planned Parenthood's active intervention.

Zandt, a media technologist, was not working for the nonprofit. She set up the tumblr, posted a link to Facebook, sent it to twenty friends, and it was off. Planned Parenthood did reach out to her – not to interfere, but to ask if there was anything they could do to help.

“I can't imagine many organizations of the size that Planned Parenthood is,” Zandt said in an interview a few weeks after the Komen scandal broke, “calling me up and saying, we love what you are doing it, keep doing it. They recognize that they need to be open to people taking something and running with it.”

Broader protests

There are some signs indicating what staying power the success over Komen might have for reproductive rights activists taking up more conventional policy battles. When Virginia lawmakers were considering a bill mandating a transvaginal ultrasound for any patient seeking an abortion, a coalition of activists organized a silent protest at the state legislature: over 1000 people lined the walkway legislators needed to pass through to reach their session, forcing them to confront the faces of their constituents and their disapproval before placing their vote.

After the protest, Virginia's Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, said he would not sign the bill, and the transvaginal ultrasound provision was dropped. It was a momentary victory — the state legislature passed an amended version of the bill that still required a conventional abdominal ultrasound — so the call went out again on activists' Facebook pages, and over a thousand protestors returned to the Virginia capitol. This time they were met with lines of riot cops, and 34 people were arrested for staging a sit-in. News and images of the protest came out immediately on Twitter and Facebook. On March 7, Virginia' governor signed the bill into law, and it is expected to go into effect July 1, though this group of protestors continue to mobilize in Virginia.

These protests, using direct action for reproductive rights, are a media-friendly mix of Occupy-era tactics – the silent protest itself borrowed from an action at the University of California Davis and an accompanying video that circulated widely on YouTube – amplified by an upswell of interest in the politics of women's health in the weeks following the Komen controversy. Planned Parenthood had little to do directly with the protest's success in getting the transvaginal ultrasound provision dropped. A local affiliate lent support to a sanctioned rally a few days later, but Planned Parenthood itself is no position to organize a protest using tactics like civil disobedience. That moving-and-shaking is up to grassroots activists, with supportive individuals spreading the word on social media. The momentum – protests in the street and immediate social media attention – might be sustainable, too. A few days after the first Virginia protest, Republicans in Pennsylvania canceled a debate on a copycat mandatory ultrasound bill.

Have women won?

Is this a game-changing moment for reproductive rights? In looking for the kick-off moment, both staffers at Planned Parenthood I spoke to point back to early last year, when they were at risk of losing all federal funding.

Between February and March 2011, when the issue dominated the news, Planned Parenthood spokesman Tait Sye said, Planned Parenthood added 1.2 million new supporters to their lists. Half of those supporters were under the age of thirty-five.

That's because young women are the ones affected the most when reproductive and sexual health issues enter the legislature, said Eesha Pandit, the former advocacy director.

Those numbers also shouldn't be surprising given that existing networks of activists already organized offline and on.

Around the same time last year that Planned Parenthood faced federal defunding, many of these younger reproductive rights activists were immersed in a national fight of their own. Dozens of anti-abortion billboards began popping up in communities of color and low-income neighborhoods, with slogans like “The most dangerous place for an African-American is in the womb” and “Abortion is black genocide.”

In Atlanta, New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, locally based reproductive justice activists called out the billboards' rhetoric as racist, identified the conservative organizations behind the billboards, and ultimately got them removed.

“Women of color in different communities were sharing information with each other about how to get the billboards down, and that was all happening on social media,” Pandit said. “While there was the campaign online to get the billboards down, to take direct action, it was also infused in a larger online discussion connected to a movement to get these billboards down all around the country. Social media was just one tool here to effect things in the world, not only on the Internet.”

Pandit said that grassroots activists can move quickly to capitalize on a political moment, giving a small organization the ability to make a lot more noise than a meager communications budget might allow. But she cautioned against looking at the ongoing fight over women's health and deciding that social media was the ultimate equalizer.

"Building a movement around reproductive justice, or any other issue, requires sustained momentum, that equips communities with what they need to organize," she said. There needs to be a deep connection there that's not just superficial. Even smaller grassroots groups need to think about where they put their social media organizing in context with the rest of the organizing they do.”

Republicans and Democrats are framing "the war on women” as another culture war on which to stake out a side. But activists and organizers for reproductive rights are working to keep the focus on the fall-out from these attacks on women's daily lives — the denial of life-saving healthcare, as in the breast cancer screenings Komen attempted to defund, and the likelihood that more women will be forced to carry a pregnancy to term — and looking online to do it.

Though Planned Parenthood is so far the most visible beneficiary of this online activism — during and immediately after the Komen fight, their email list grew to 6 million members — their win owes to a successful combination of grassroots organizing and online amplification. What remains to be seen is how grassroots activists, coming off these victories, can adapt their tactics to take on other reproductive rights' fights –– and how old institutions, like Planned Parenthood, are going to react.

News Briefs

RSS Feed today >

Civic Hackers Call on de Blasio to Fill Technology Vacancies

New York City technology advocates on Wednesday called on the de Blasio administration to fill vacancies in top technology policy positions, expressing some frustration at the lack of a leadership team to implement a cohesive technology strategy for the city. GO

China's Porn Purge Has Only Just Begun, And Already Sina Is Stripped of Publication License

It seems that China is taking spring cleaning pretty seriously. On April 13 they launched their most recent online purge, “Cleaning the Web 2014,” which will run until November. The goal is to rid China's Internet of pornographic text, pictures, video, and ads in order to “create a healthy cyberspace.” More than 100 websites and thousands of social media accounts have already been closed, after less than a month. Today the official Xinhua news agency reported that the authorities have stripped the Internet giant Sina (of Sina Weibo, the popular microblogging site) of its online publication license. This crackdown on porn comes on the heels of a crackdown on “rumors.” Clearly, this spring cleaning isn't about pornography, it's about censorship and control.

GO

wednesday >

Another Co-Opted Hashtag: #MustSeeIran

The Twitter hashtag #MustSeeIran was created to showcase Iran's architecture, landscapes, and would-be tourist destinations. It was then co-opted by activists to bring attention to human rights abuses and infringements. Now Twitter is home to two starkly different portraits of a country. GO

What Has the EU Ever Done For Us?: Countering Euroskepticism with Viral Videos and Monty Python

Ahead of the May 25 European Elections, the most intense campaigning may not be by the candidates or the political parties. Instead, some of the most passionate campaigns are more grassroots efforts focused on for a start stirring up the interest of the European electorate. GO

At NETmundial Brazil: Is "Multistakeholderism" Good for the Internet?

Today and tomorrow Brazil is hosting NETmundial, a global multi-stakeholder meeting on the future of Internet governance. GO

Brazilian President Signs Internet Bill of Rights Into Law at NetMundial

Earlier today Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff sanctioned Marco Civil, also called the Internet bill of rights, during the global Internet governance event, NetMundial, in Brazil.

GO

tuesday >

Ruck.us Reboots As a Candidate Digital Toolkit That's a Bit Too Like Democracy.com

Ruck.us launched with big ambitions and star appeal, hoping to crack the code on how to get millions of people to pool their political passions through their platform. When that ambition stalled, its founder Nathan Daschle--son of the former Senator--decided to pivot to offering political candidates an easy-to-use free web platform for organizing and fundraising. Now the new Ruck.us is out from stealth mode, entering a field already being served by competitors like NationBuilder, Salsa Labs and Democracy.com. And strangely enough, Ruck.us seems to want its early users to ask Democracy.com for help. GO

Armenian Legislators: You Can Be As Anonymous on the 'Net As You Like—Until You Can't

A proposed bill in Armenia would make it illegal for media outlets to include defamatory remarks by anonymous or fake sources, and require sites to remove libelous comments within 12 hours unless they identify the author.

GO

monday >

The Good Wife Looks for the Next Snowden and Outwits the NSA

Even as the real Edward Snowden faces questions over his motives in Russia, another side of his legacy played out for the over nine million viewers of last night's The Good Wife, which concluded its season long storyline exploring NSA surveillance. In the episode titled All Tapped Out, one young NSA worker's legal concerns lead him to becoming a whistle-blower, setting off a chain of events that allows the main character, lawyer Alicia Florrick (Julianna Margulies), and her husband, Illinois Governor Peter Florrick (Chris Noth), to turn the tables on the NSA using its own methods. GO

The Expanding Reach of China's Crowdsourced Environmental Monitoring Site, Danger Maps

Last week billionaire businessman Jack Ma, founder of the e-commerce company Alibaba, appealed to his “500 million-strong army” of consumers to help monitor water quality in China. Inexpensive testing kits sold through his company can be used to measure pH, phosphates, ammonia, and heavy metal levels, and then the data can be uploaded via smartphone to the environmental monitoring site Danger Maps. Although the initiative will push the Chinese authorities' tolerance for civic engagement and activism, Ethan Zuckerman has high hopes for “monitorial citizenship” in China.

GO

The 13 Worst Bits of Russia's Current and Maybe Future Internet Legislation

It appears that Russia is on the brink of passing still more repressive Internet regulations. A new telecommunications bill that would require popular blogs—those with 3,000 or more visits a day—to join a government registry and conform to government-mandated standards is expected to pass this week. What follows is a list of the worst bits of both proposed and existing Russian Internet law. Let us know in the comments or on Twitter if we missed anything.

GO

More