Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Editorial: Debate Questions About Tech and the Internet Still #Unasked

BY Andrew Rasiej | Tuesday, February 21 2012

GOP presidential debate, August 11, 2011. Source:

We created techPresident in 2007 in anticipation that some day we would actually elect a "Tech President" who understood the Internet was more than a "series of tubes" and who would usher in a new era of 21st century tech enabled policy to help them govern.

In the 2008 Presidential campaign, Candidate Obama's technology policy was considered and often touted as a major indicator for how a President Obama would govern. Disappointingly, many of those original tech-related policy ideas died once President Obama took office, even though a few, like selecting Aneesh Chopra as the first ever White House CTO, were in fact instituted.

Since 2008, Internet and mobile technology usage has continued to explode in importance not only in this country but around the world. Many social media sites and, of course, Facebook and Twitter, are now mainstream communication vehicles used by political parties, candidates, and activists to rally supporters, raise awareness, and even help take down dictators (think Mubarak) and legislation (think SOPA). So you would think that attention to technology policy and issues would have increased particularly during the current Presidential debate cycle.

Think again.

The Guardian's Citizens Agenda project, working with the Studio 20 New York University class taught by Jay Rosen, just released a comprehensive study of the GOP presidential debates of 2011-12. Of the 839 questions asked in the twenty debates that have already taken place, just four questions have been asked of the candidates that in any way touch on technology or the internet. There have been two about investment in green technology, one on incentives for green tech, and one--which came from a Twitter user--about the candidates' position on SOPA.

Considering how Internet is now a crucial platform for the world economy, I find this troubling and another indication that we are still electing 20th century politicians using 20th century tools like televised debates.

So, with a only a few debates left on the horizon, I'd like to suggest a few questions that I think would be revelatory if they were able to be inserted into the discussion. If you like them, just RT a link to this post along with the hashtag: #unasked. If you prefer to offer you own question(s) just tweet them using the same #unasked and they will be collected in a way we hope will get the attention of the debate organizers. (The "#unasked" hashtag is being promoted by The Guardian.)

They don't need to be about technology issues either. If you feel there has been a lack of attention during the debates on any other issue, use #unasked to help highlight what you think should be asked.

Here are my three #unasked questions:

1) Do voters have a right to know what data candidates and political parties are collecting on them and what happens to this data after the election?

2) Should American companies be free to sell surveillance and internet technologies globally even to totalitarian or non-democratic regimes?

3) How should America increase low cost access to high-speed broadband in order to all Americans to effectively compete in the 21st Century Internet economy?

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.