Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

PIPA Sponsor Will Cut Domain Name Blocking Provision From Measure

BY Sarah Lai Stirland | Thursday, January 12 2012

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, (D-Vermont) said on Thursday that he will cut a controversial domain name blocking provision from an online intellectual property protection bill he is sponsoring in response to concerns expressed by the public, but especially from his constituents.

The provision of the Protecting Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2001 would have enabled the Justice Department to obtain a court order to force Internet Service Providers to block access to domains of web sites that Justice had determined were "dedicated" to infringement.

Dozens of the internet's founding engineers have said that the provision would end up messing up the architecture of the global network, and rights groups decried the provision as being reminiscent of the censorship schemes of undemocratic countries.

In the statement that he issued Thursday Leahy said that he'll substitute the provision as it currently is with a section in the manager's amendment that will commission a study of the pros and cons of blocking access. The senate floor is scheduled to move the legislation January 24.

Leahy made the concession somewhat grudgingly, mentioning that the provision had been OKed by the cable companies:

I remain confident that the ISPs – including the cable industry, which is the largest association of ISPs – would not support the legislation if its enactment created the problems that opponents of this provision suggest. Nonetheless, this is in fact a highly technical issue, and I am prepared to recommend we give it more study before implementing it.

The move appears to be a significant, incremental win for the grassroots activists. FightForTheFuture.org, the online activism arm of the Center for Rights in Worcester, Mass., and Public Knowledge had organized a campaign for call-ins and and in-person meetings between constituents and congressmen at their town halls before congress convenes again on January 23th.

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

First POST: Overreaching

Why the FCC balked at the Comcast-TimeWarner deal; Sheryl Sandberg wants Hillary Clinton to lean into the White House; the UK's Democracy Club brings a lot more information to election season; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Ownership

"Tell us more about your bog"; the shrinking role of public participation on campaign websites; "Aaron's Law" has been reintroduced in Congress; is the Comcast-TimeWarner merger on its last legs?; and much, much more. GO

wednesday >

First POST: Bush League

Presidential candidates hiding behind Super PACs; what this means for American democracy; demos at the White House; a demand for Facebook to be more open about news in the newsfeed; and much, much more. GO

tuesday >

First POST: Glass Half Full

A new Pew study on open government data in the US; the FOIA exemption ruffling transparency advocates' feathers; social media bot farms; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Zucked Up

Mark Zuckerberg responds to criticism of "zero rating" Facebook access in India; turning TVs into computers; how Facebook is changing the way UK users see the upcoming General Election; BuzzFeed's split priorities; a new website for "right-of-center women"; and much, much more. GO

More