Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

The Game: How Campaigns' New Obsession With Social Media is Hurting America

BY Nick Judd | Monday, January 9 2012

Roemer has hired Adam and Zach Green, a father-and-son team of Twitter consultants, to help him find traction online. We know Green and son as skilled analysts of Twitter conversations, and people who we've worked with to see if we could glean anything of interest about candidates from the types of conversations being had about them. They built one of the first and most comprehensive Twitter dashboards of the election cycle. I appreciated it at the time because it tracked interesting metrics like changes in Twitter followers. Now, though, they themselves seem to have slid downward along a spiral they helped to create: Having established one of the earliest 2012 leaderboards to rank presidential candidates by @-mentions and retweets, they're at work for a candidate who then became motivated to improve his score.

Roemer's campaign now has a device through which supporters can "donate" the use of their Twitter handle to the former Louisiana governor's election effort. It uses the Twitter API to push what Team Roemer promises is no more than one tweet per day through each supporter's account, towards the stated goal of getting "1,000 accounts that share Buddy's message every day." The program picks which account passes along a message based on how often Team Roemer wants to put tweets into the tweet stream and which accounts have yet to send a message that day. There is no targeting to a volunteer's particular social connections. Once a day, the campaign wants to turn its supporters' Twitter accounts into mindless zombies — all in the name of raising stats. The campaign is achieving its desired result: Roemer's new follow rate, retweets and mention count have all gone up. This doesn't do much for the follower's investment in the campaign, or an understanding of Roemer by the public at large; it did, however, generate a glowing story on Mashable, and more white noise into a political campaign already low on signal.

Jon Huntsman's campaign has a similar set-up, offering volunteers a list of sample tweets they can push out with a press of a button. The result of this pursuit of better numbers online is more scripted, one-way campaign messaging on Twitter. What benefits come along with that new high score? Ask Herman Cain — getting the most votes still requires getting the most votes, and, you know, not being forced off the campaign trail as the result of a scandal.

All of this is kind of a bizarre twist in the long history of game theory and what it does to online politics. Now it's the politicians, and not their supporters, pursuing better results on some online scoreboard. But for years, as far back as the Howard Dean and George W. Bush campaigns of 2004, activists on the left and right have used their understanding of human motivations to build tools that try to make supporters do more than they otherwise would.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

NYC Open Data Advocates Focus on Quality And Value Over Quantity

The New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications plans to publish more than double the amount of datasets this year than it published to the portal last year, new Commissioner Anne Roest wrote last week in an annual report mandated by the city's open data law, with 135 datasets scheduled to be released this year, and almost 100 more to come in 2015. But as preparations are underway for City Council open data oversight hearings in the fall, what matters more to advocates than the absolute number of the datasets is their quality. GO

Civic Tech and Engagement: Announcing a New Series on What Makes it "Thick"

Announcing a new series of feature articles that we will be publishing over the next several months, thanks to the support of the Rita Allen Foundation. Our focus is on digitally-enabled civic engagement, and in particular, how and under what conditions "thick" digital civic engagement occurs. What we're after is answers to this question: When does a tech tool or platform enable actual people to make ongoing and significant contributions to each other, to a place or cause, at a scale that produces demonstrable change? GO

monday >

Tweets2Rue Helps Homeless to Help Themselves Through Twitter

While most solutions to homelessness focus on addressing physical needs -- a roof over the head and food to eat -- one initiative in France known as Tweets2Rue knows that for the homeless, a house is still not a home, so to speak: the homeless are often entrenched in a viscous cycle of social isolation that keeps them invisible and powerless. GO

Oakland's Sudo Mesh Looks to Counter Censorship and Digital Divide With a Mesh Network

In Oakland, a city with deep roots in radical activism and a growing tech scene at odds with the hyper-capital-driven Silicon Valley, those at the Sudo Room hackerspace believe that the solution to a wide range of problems, from censorship to the digital divide, is a mesh net, a type of decentralized network that is resilient to censorship and disruption and can also bring connectivity to poor communities.

GO

More