Access Is Trying to Block Pakistan from Blocking Internet Access
BY Raphael Majma | Monday, March 12 2012
Activist group Access has started an online petition that asks international software firms to not bid on creating the Pakistani government’s national firewall. On Feb. 23, the Pakistani government placed out an advertisement in the national press calling for software firms and local institutions to bid on “the development, deployment and operation of a national level URL Filtering and Blocking System.” For a number of years, the government has practiced blocking sites that they consider to be “obscene” or offensive to Islam. This new system, which officials want to be capable of blocking up to 50 million URLs, would be a substantial tightening of an already heavily regulated Pakistani Internet. As of December 2011, Pakistan had over 29 million Internet users, all of whom will be affected if the system is put in place. Read More
On Google+, Peering Over the Great Firewall at Obama's Campaign
BY Raphael Majma | Monday, February 27 2012
Chinese Internet users have started to “occupy” President Barack Obama’s Google+ page. Google+ is normally blocked to users in China, but some users have been able to access the site using mobile devices while others remain unable to access the site at all. Read More
Iranian Internet Disruptions May Be Sign of Iran's Own "Clean Internet" to Come
BY Raphael Majma | Wednesday, February 15 2012
What appear to be Iranian government efforts to interdict or inspect Internet traffic have come with increasing frequency in recent months. Most recently, Iranian activists and journalists were the target of an anonymous Feb. 13 email “warning” that threatened them with punishment for working for the goals of foreigners. Read More
New Google Blogger Changes Enable Country-by-Country Censorship
BY Miranda Neubauer | Thursday, February 2 2012
Google has begun redirecting blogs hosted on its Blogger platform to geographically specific domains when accessed from certain countries in order to enable selective, country-by-country content removal, as was first noted by Techdows. The move is reminiscent of a similar recent announcement by Twitter.
So far, Google seems to have turned on the redirection for users accessing blogs from India and Australia, for example. Read MoreNobody's Mad About Twitter's Censorship Move ... Except For the People Who Are
BY Nick Judd | Friday, January 27 2012
Over at Huffington Post, Bianca Bosker reports on a growing group of Twitter users who plan to stop using Twitter for a full day tomorrow in protest against the company's newly announced ability to censor different tweets in different countries. After all, what is Internet organizing for if not rising up against the consensus opinion of gatekeepers and powers that be? Read More
Why Nobody's Mad at Twitter's International Censorship Move
BY Nick Judd | Friday, January 27 2012
Yesterday, to the howls of many, Twitter announced that it is launching country-specific versions of its platform, and with them the ability to selectively censor tweets based on the laws of a given country. Observers may have noticed, however, that there were some pretty prominent voices not howling at Twitter. At Marketingland, Danny Sullivan — emperor of the Search Engine Land empire — told people "not to worry." ReadWriteWeb notes that it seems pretty easy to get around this censorship — in theory, users should be able to just change their country settings. Earlier this morning, Andy Carvin noted that Facebook, Yahoo and YouTube have all gone through the same situation. Read More
Twitter Announces It May Now "Withhold" Different Tweets In Different Countries
BY Nick Judd | Thursday, January 26 2012
Twitter announced on its blog Thursday that it has built for itself the ability to change what messages appear in your Twitter feed depending on what country you're in. The result is a selectively censored Twitter experience, based on the laws of the user's country. It comes nearly one year ago to the day since Twitter announced, "Our position on freedom of expression carries with it a mandate to protect our users' right to speak freely and preserve their ability to contest having their private information revealed." Twitter frames the move as an effort to comply with local laws, retain the ability to stay up in a given country and be as open and transparent as possible about the process. "In the face of a valid and applicable legal order," Twitter spokeswoman Jodi Olson wrote to me in an email, "the choice facing services is between global removal of content with no notice to the user, or a transparent, targeted approach where the content is removed only in the country in question." Read More
Should The U.S. Government Be Able to Ban "Terrorists" from Twitter?
BY Nick Judd | Tuesday, December 20 2011
Glenn Greenwald watches the New York Times conflate accused terrorists using Twitter with "Twitter terrorism," on the occasion of an account connected with the militant Islamist Somali organization Harakat al-Shabab al-Mujahedeen making an appearance in the Gray Lady; nameless government officials assert that they have the right to force Twitter to shut such accounts down; and really nobody (except him) question that assertion. Read More
Twitter Denies Yet Another Censorship Accusation
BY Nick Judd | Monday, December 19 2011
Yesterday, Business Insider contributor David Seaman posted an item titled, "Welcome to the United Police States of America, Sponsored By Twitter." Any headline that can combine Twitter with an appeal to the paranoia of Internet libertarians everywhere is a sure-fire hit, and this one was, too: Business Insider's hit counter suggests that Seaman's post has already garnered over 70,000 views. The thing is that Seaman's post appears to be flat-out wrong. Read More
North Korea's Antediluvian Change of Power
BY Nick Judd | Monday, December 19 2011
Reuters notes that North Korea's dearth of mobile phones and Internet connections played a role in the two-day gap between Kim Jong-Il's death and its public announcement. Read More