I'm right with electiongeek on this one. Proper etiquette should dictate that the candidate answering the question should thank the person asking the question. After all, they are probably watching. Move quickly into the answer though. Don't linger with exclamations of how great the question was.
YouTube VI: Talking to the questioner
By Spencer Overton, 07/23/2007 - 8:31pm
By Spencer Overton, 07/23/2007 - 8:31pm
When Hillary Clinton and other candidates look at the screen and say "Thank You XXXX, for the question," I'm split. On one hand, these are not live feeds, and it seems a bit artificial to talk back to the screen. Would any of us talk to the screen at home after watching a YouTube video? On the other hand, talking to the screen errs on the side of being respectful, and unlike those of us at home these candidates are watching videos of people who are probably watching the candidates on CNN. What is the proper protocol in this new context?
Recent blog posts
- Changes at Change.org: A Media Hub for Social Action
- Daily Digest: Why '08 Will Be the Election of Databases (One Way or Another)
- Last-Minute Push for Reluctant Technologists to Embrace, Evangelize Obama
- Daily Digest: From Field to Felonies to Fine-Tuned Targeting
- Must-Read: Zack Exley on the "New Organizers"
- The Curious Case of Palin's Inbox
- Public Submitted Thousands of Debate Questions Online, Not Millions [Updated]
- Daily Digest: Was Last Night a Waste of 90 Minutes? Debatable
- "Townhall" Style Debate a Dot-Bust
- Seesmic Partnering With Washington Post For Post Debate Video Blogging Commentary
Recent comments
- Thanks, Micah
2 hours 47 min ago - Fascinating on many levels ...
2 days 12 hours ago - But the Eagles of Death Metal...
3 days 7 hours ago - A first try at an election protection tagging taxonomy
3 days 8 hours ago - Case study
3 days 9 hours ago - This could be a great case study ...
3 days 9 hours ago - Now's the Time to Act
3 days 18 hours ago - Re: Interference
3 days 23 hours ago - Delighted to join in the conversation, and ...
4 days 10 hours ago - Interference
4 days 11 hours ago
Most Emailed
Tags
10Questions
1984
2007 Campaign Web Index
ActBlue
Al Gore
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Chris Dodd
CNN
debates
Dennis Kucinich
Elizabeth Edwards
Email
Eventful
Facebook
FISA
Fred Thompson
fundraising
google
Hillary Clinton
Howard Dean
Huffington Post
Iowa
Jeff Jarvis
Joe Biden
joe trippi
John Culberson
John Edwards
John McCain
Mike Gravel
Mike Huckabee
Mitt Romney
Mobile
MoveOn
MTV
MySpace
netroots
New Hampshire
Newt Gingrich
Obama
Off the Bus
online fundraising
pdf2008
RNC
Ron Paul
Rudy Giuliani
Sam Brownback
Sarah Palin
Second Life
social networking
Spotlight
strategy
Tom Tancredo
transparency
Twitter
video
Wikipedia
yahoo
YearlyKos
YouTube
Navigation
© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
To Thank a Screen or Not to Thank a Screen
I honestly always cringe whenever they thank anyone. I just want candidates to get to the answers and all that thanking takes up valuable time.
With that said, they should thank the screen. You have to think of them on a stage and the debate itself a performance. Performance isn't about reality but creating reality. It is realistically nonsensical to thank a television screen whether or not the persons image is live anyway. It is an illusion, they don't see you through the screen they see you through the feed. So thanking a screen on a talk show when someone is on through satellite is as nonsensical as thanking a pre-taped video on that same screen.
So it would make sense to thank the screen and not the audience as the illusion is that they are talking through the screen and not the audience.