YouTube VI: Talking to the questioner
By Spencer Overton, 07/23/2007 - 8:31pm

When Hillary Clinton and other candidates look at the screen and say "Thank You XXXX, for the question," I'm split. On one hand, these are not live feeds, and it seems a bit artificial to talk back to the screen. Would any of us talk to the screen at home after watching a YouTube video? On the other hand, talking to the screen errs on the side of being respectful, and unlike those of us at home these candidates are watching videos of people who are probably watching the candidates on CNN. What is the proper protocol in this new context?

To Thank a Screen or Not to Thank a Screen

I honestly always cringe whenever they thank anyone. I just want candidates to get to the answers and all that thanking takes up valuable time.

With that said, they should thank the screen. You have to think of them on a stage and the debate itself a performance. Performance isn't about reality but creating reality. It is realistically nonsensical to thank a television screen whether or not the persons image is live anyway. It is an illusion, they don't see you through the screen they see you through the feed. So thanking a screen on a talk show when someone is on through satellite is as nonsensical as thanking a pre-taped video on that same screen.

So it would make sense to thank the screen and not the audience as the illusion is that they are talking through the screen and not the audience.

Thank the screen, then move quickly to answering

I'm right with electiongeek on this one. Proper etiquette should dictate that the candidate answering the question should thank the person asking the question. After all, they are probably watching. Move quickly into the answer though. Don't linger with exclamations of how great the question was.



© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |