- Changes at Change.org: A Media Hub for Social Action
- Daily Digest: Why '08 Will Be the Election of Databases (One Way or Another)
- Last-Minute Push for Reluctant Technologists to Embrace, Evangelize Obama
- Daily Digest: From Field to Felonies to Fine-Tuned Targeting
- Must-Read: Zack Exley on the "New Organizers"
- The Curious Case of Palin's Inbox
- Public Submitted Thousands of Debate Questions Online, Not Millions [Updated]
- Daily Digest: Was Last Night a Waste of 90 Minutes? Debatable
- "Townhall" Style Debate a Dot-Bust
- Seesmic Partnering With Washington Post For Post Debate Video Blogging Commentary
By Colin Delany, 11/08/2007 - 11:51am
Cross-posted on e.politics
Continuing with the recent exciting news from the Republican side of our little presidential campaign, Bruce Reed notes in Slate that Rudy Giuliani's official blog seems to be acting in sympathy with Hollywood writers except that instead of the writers striking, it's the readers.
Rudy's staff has added a "how many views has this piece received" feature to the blog, and my advice to them would be to start clicking on the articles like crazy, 'cause it sure doesn't look as though anyone else is. Reed's happy to point out that the November 1st "Hizzoner's Highlights" seems to have been read 37 times, though several posts have reader counts in the hundreds.
Actually, a little experimentation shows that the "views" number reflects how many times the LINK that each article title points to has been clicked on, which is a totally different number than how many times the article itself has been read. In fact, all the blog posts seem to sit on the page in their entirety, and so an accurate reader count per article would be impossible unless you're tracking actual eyeball motions.
What a strange way to run a blog all around normally, an article title links to a standalone version of the post, not to some outside piece. The way the Guiliani site is set up, I don't see how you can link to a particular article, leave a comment or trackback, or do just about anything else you expect to be able to do on a normal blog. It's as though they decided to create a blog-like piece of communications technology without the actual blog features. The only piece of reader interaction? That click-counter, whose sole effect is to make it look as though the site is essentially unread. Nice, um, job.
– cpd
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
- Thanks, Micah
2 hours 51 min ago - Fascinating on many levels ...
2 days 12 hours ago - But the Eagles of Death Metal...
3 days 7 hours ago - A first try at an election protection tagging taxonomy
3 days 8 hours ago - Case study
3 days 9 hours ago - This could be a great case study ...
3 days 9 hours ago - Now's the Time to Act
3 days 18 hours ago - Re: Interference
3 days 23 hours ago - Delighted to join in the conversation, and ...
4 days 10 hours ago - Interference
4 days 11 hours ago

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
They're just kickin' it old school
The first "web logs" were just that: a log of links to the interesting websites one came across with some commentary. Of course that was over a decade ago. The Digg-like icon for the view count is also strangely tiny, but using unreadable 8 point font was hip back in 1994 too.