Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Winning in 2010: Putting the Pieces Together

BY Colin Delany | Wednesday, December 9 2009

The Conclusion to How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010, now available for download at Epolitics.com

Download Winning in 2010

Winning in 2010

2010 will not be 2008: for one thing, we aren't likely to see the massive voter turnout that helped put Barack Obama in the White House. As in other political off-years, the 2010 results will swing on the decisions of a relatively small number of voters, an effect that will be magnified down the chain -- the smaller the race, the more effect a handful of votes can have. This kind of environment obviously encourages a focus on getting as many core supporters to the polls as possible.

As we've seen in this series, the internet absolutely excels at maintaining connections with individual voters and at energizing them to recruit their friends, donate their money and volunteer their time. The 2010 elections won't be determined by the internet alone (candidates and ideas do matter!), but campaigns that employ online strategies intelligently and with real-world goals in mind should have a significant edge over their rivals, particularly in tight races.

This is a year in which state- and local-level politics will matter. Not only will the new Congress help determine the fate of Barack Obama's remaining political agenda, but the state legislators who take their seats in 2011 will redraw political districts across the country, a process destined to shape our political landscape for a decade to come. Now that you've read this guide, YOU have the tools to influence how those elections turn out.

And if you need help, let's chat.

A Basic Online Oureach Plan

Now that we understand the essential tools and tactics of online political organizing, let's put them together into a coherent plan to win an election.

Phase One: Getting Established

At the start, campaigns need to focus on getting the basics right, a process that may take from a few days to a few weeks. The initial steps:

  • Begin monitoring the race; set up Google Alerts on the candidate and opponent.
  • Build and launch website with integrated supporter signup/CRM/fundraising system (see Chapter Two).
  • Establish Facebook (and MySpace?) profiles and connect with local political activists.
  • Establish YouTube channel with initial content (even if only a single clip).
  • Establish Twitter account and blog, if campaign will be using either or both.
  • Identify relevant (usually local) political blogs based on audience and topic.
  • Identify other prominent online voices, including Twitterers, videobloggers and frequent commenters on local political sites.

Phase Two: Feeding the Beast

With an infrastructure in place, a campaign moves into the long middle period between the candidate's announcement and the actual voting. List-building and fundraising will be usually be the highest priority, supported by outreach and content creation.

  • Integrate website promo into all print materials and broadcast advertising.
  • Recruit new supporters/list members at in-person events.
  • Begin online advertising, particularly on Google but also on blogs and local media sites.
  • Begin comprehensive email-based online fundraising via CRM.
  • Solicit and organize supporters' volunteer time, also via CRM but possibly through custom social network.
  • Expand/improve campaign website content.
  • Expand connections on social networking websites and Twitter; post new content regularly.
  • Encourage supporters to spread the word and recruit friends through their online and offline channels.
  • Post additional online videos to YouTube profile and campaign website as needed and as available
  • Build relationships with local bloggers, Twitterers and other online influentials, with an eye to pitching stories and arranging opportunities to speak directly to their audiences.
  • Continue monitoring independent online content posted about the race; respond as necessary and able.

Phase Three: Run-Up to Election Day

Once an election is close, an online campaign will shift into full mobilization mode.

  • Begin final push for volunteer involvement, including block-walking and phonebanking.
  • Begin early/absentee voting push, if applicable.
  • Send final fundraising appeals.
  • Encourage last-minute supporter online evangelism on Facebook, personal email, etc.
  • Ramp up email campaign intensity via CRM to support all of the above activities.
  • Online advertising may switch to encouraging early voting and connecting people with polling places.
  • On Election Day, send final appeals via email, social networking outlets, text messaging, campaign website, Twitter and other channels. Hope for the best.
  • After the election, send follow-up message to supporters.

For More Information

Other Guides from E.politics

Related Articles

cpd

News Briefs

RSS Feed tuesday >

First POST: Company

The global "Snowden effect" is huge; how many consumer-facing online services fail the user privacy test; the Dems' 2016 digital to-do list; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Mood Slime

The Sony email leak reveals the MPAA's campaign against Google; how Uber is lobbying in local markets; mapping the #MillionsMarchNYC; and much, much more. GO

friday >

First POST: Cloudy

What the Internet is not; new analysis of public opinion on net neutrality; how cloud backup apparently foiled a police coverup; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Records

Is the future of citizen journalism vigilantism?; one tech mogul's vocal support for CIA torture; a cri de couer from the founder of the Pirate Bay; and much, much more. GO

Web Index Sees Impact of Net Neutrality, Surveillance and Copyright Laws

Denmark, Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have come out on top of the Web Index, a ranking of the Web Foundation measuring the economic, social and political benefit that countries gain from the web. The United States is at number six. For the authors of the report accompanying the index, the results reflect how inequality has an impact on access to the web. "Nordic policy-makers have been quick to adopt and promote the free Internet - and open access to information - as a 21st century public good," the report states. " Others, as this year's findings show, need to move fast to catch up." The report attributes the Scandinavian countries' advantage to the countries' broader efforts to invest in public goods and establish a welfare and acting against " excess concentrations of wealth and power." With the lower inequality in those countries than in others, "the skills, means and freedoms to benefit from new technologies are widespread, which helps to explain why Scandinavian countries score highly on the political, social and economic impact of the Web GO

More