Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Who's at Fault for Hyping Haystack?

BY Nancy Scola | Monday, September 13 2010

Over on her personal blog, the Berkman Center's Jillian York tears into "the media" for its part in selling the story of Haystack, a much-discussed online circumvention software project that bubbled up from the froth of coverage around Iran's supposed post-election "Twitter revolution." Evgeny Morozov has done his part to poke some holes in the Haystack story, and creator Austin Heap has pulled Haystack back into the labs until its security implications can be vetted more fully, telling potential users "If you have a copy of the test program, please refrain from using it." What York's wondering is why those in the press ran with the Haystack story as if Big Foot had been tagged, tracked, and scrutinized:

Haystack has been billed by the media since last summer as a wonder tool, a silver bullet for the Iranians who need desperately to evade censorship.  The truth is that, until this week, no one–neither the media nor the circumvention community–could actually vouch for Haystack one way or the other, because none of them actually saw a copy. No one was capable of speaking to the tool’s security or efficacy, and yet, a number of journalists did anyway. 

I've got several thoughts on this, none of which make me sound less than cynical. But here are hints at a few.

For one thing, the pace of the news cycle these days and the value placed on "big stories!" create something of a personal storm around tech. So much of what genuinely matters in the reporting of tech news is process, and process stories aren't generally all that tweetable. The State Department gave something of a seal of approval to the approach Haystack was said to be taking, as folks like the New York Times' Mark Landler wrote. It takes real work for reporters and editors to vet tech stories; it's not enough to fact check quotes, figures, and events. Even "seeing a copy," as York puts it, isn't enough. Projects like Haystack need to be checked-out by technologists in the know, and I'd argue the before the recent rise of techno-advocates like, say, Clay Johnson or Tom Lee, there weren't obvious knowledgeable sources for even dedicated reporters to call to help them make sense of something like Haystack, on deadline and in English.

More than that, though, writers and reporters learn by watching what happens to others, and you can make perfectly good living writing less than accurately about tech for an outfit like CNET or the Washington Post. There's not much incentive, other than personal integrity and honor, I guess, to expend the time and effort to get this stuff really right. You might get called out by a Berkman Center staffer, sure. But really, the majority of your audience -- and editors -- still think you're a hip, with-it, cutting edge writer who can help them tap into this strange new digital world. Not a bad gig if you can get it.

News Briefs

RSS Feed wednesday >

In Mexico, A Wiki Makes Corporate Secrets Public

Earlier this year the Latin American NGO Poder launched Quién Es Quién Wiki (Who's Who Wiki), a corporate transparency project more than two years in the making. The hope is that the platform will be the foundation for a citizen-led movement demanding transparency and accountability from businesses in Mexico. Data from Quién Es Quién Wiki is already helping community activists mobilize against foreign companies preparing to mine the mountains of the Sierra Norte de Puebla.

GO

thursday >

NY Study Shows How Freedom of Information Can Inform Open Data

On New York State's open data portal, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation has around 40 data resources of varying sizes, such as maps of lakes and ponds and rivers, bird conservation areas and hiking trails. But those datasets do not include several data resources that are most sought after by many New York businesses, a new study from advocacy group Reinvent Albany has found. Welcome to a little-discussed corner of so-called "open government"--while agencies often pay lip service to the cause, the data they actually release is sometimes nowhere close to what is most wanted. GO

Responding to Ferguson, Activists Organize #NMOS14 Vigils Across America In Just 4 Days

This evening peaceful crowds will gather at more than 90 locations around the country to honor the victims of police brutality, most recently the unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on Saturday. A moment of silence will begin at 20 minutes past 7 p.m. (EST). The vigils are being organized almost entirely online by the writer and activist Feminista Jones (@FeministaJones), with help from others from around the country who have volunteered to coordinate a vigil in their communities. Organizing such a large event in only a few days is a challenge, but in addition to ironing out basic logistics, the National Moment of Silence (#NMOS14) organizers have had to deal with co-optation, misrepresentation, and Google Docs and Facebook pages that are, apparently, buckling under traffic.

GO

More