Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Trouble in the Land of Wikileaks

BY Nancy Scola | Tuesday, September 28 2010

Wired.com's Kevin Poulsen, who has been on the Wikileaks story like white on rice, joins up with his colleague Kim Zetter to report on the apparent internal complications inside the ad hoc Wikileaks organization:

A domino chain of resignations at the secret-spilling site WikiLeaks followed a unilateral decision by autocratic founder Julian Assange to schedule an October release of 392,000 classified U.S. documents from the war in Iraq, according to former WikiLeaks staffers.

Key members of WikiLeaks were angered to learn last month that Assange had secretly provided media outlets with embargoed access to the vast database, under an arrangement similar to the one WikiLeaks made with three newspapers that released documents from the Afghanistan war in July. WikiLeaks is set to release the Iraq trove on Oct. 18, according to ex-staffers -- far too early, in the view of some of them, to properly redact the names of U.S. collaborators and informants in Iraq.

“The release date which was established was completely unrealistic,” says 25-year-old Herbert Snorrason, an Icelandic university student who until recently helped manage WikiLeaks’ secure chat room. “We found out that the level of redactions performed on the Afghanistan documents was not sufficient. I announced that if the next batch did not receive full attention, I would not be willing to cooperate.”

Assange did not respond to e-mail queries from Wired.com.

According to Wired.com, citing an online chat transcript, Assange told Daniel Schmitt, who had, it seems, been serving as Wikileaks spokesperson in Germany until recent resignation, "I am the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organizer, financier and all the rest... If you have a problem with me, piss off."

Now, internal dissension isn't, of course, completely missing from your more established, traditional, corporate environments. But it's a little interesting to think about Assange and Wikileaks as a case study in the sort of Shirky-esque "organizing without organizations" mold, and the problems that might pop up when you set out to take on the world without the sort of institutionalized structue of even, say, (since this is let's-recall-the-sixties-week) something like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, a.k.a. SNCC, from the civil rights movement or the Students for a Democratic Society from that same era -- organizations that put a premium on thinking through not only the social problems they set out to tackle, but the backbone and practices of how they were going to come together to do it. Wikileaks here seems like something of a reminder that the Web might erase geographic boundaries, but it doesn't erase human behavior. Or, for that matter, some more practical questions; who holds the keys to the Wikileaks Twitter account?

How collectives that have the Web as their native environment handle that human element seems like a thesis in waiting for a forward-thinking sociology student somewhere.

Note: I edited this post post-publishing to clarify that one of the participants in the mentioned online chat had at the time been an active participant in Wikileaks.

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

First POST: Overreaching

Why the FCC balked at the Comcast-TimeWarner deal; Sheryl Sandberg wants Hillary Clinton to lean into the White House; the UK's Democracy Club brings a lot more information to election season; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Ownership

"Tell us more about your bog"; the shrinking role of public participation on campaign websites; "Aaron's Law" has been reintroduced in Congress; is the Comcast-TimeWarner merger on its last legs?; and much, much more. GO

wednesday >

First POST: Bush League

Presidential candidates hiding behind Super PACs; what this means for American democracy; demos at the White House; a demand for Facebook to be more open about news in the newsfeed; and much, much more. GO

tuesday >

First POST: Glass Half Full

A new Pew study on open government data in the US; the FOIA exemption ruffling transparency advocates' feathers; social media bot farms; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Zucked Up

Mark Zuckerberg responds to criticism of "zero rating" Facebook access in India; turning TVs into computers; how Facebook is changing the way UK users see the upcoming General Election; BuzzFeed's split priorities; a new website for "right-of-center women"; and much, much more. GO

More