Today's Obama-YouTube Q&A: Moving the Ball Forward [UPDATED]
BY Micah L. Sifry | Monday, February 1 2010
Today's YouTube event at the White House, starring President Obama, CitizenTube director Steve Grove, and a bunch of user-generated questions from the public, has to be judged a success, in my view.
Yes, as Nancy Scola pointed out here earlier today, there was an element of familiarity to both the questions and the president's answers, which is to be expected. Obama, after all, is still a cautious politician and doesn't necessarily want to make news, or god forbid, new policy, with an offhand remark. And yes, organized groups--ranging from net neutrality advocates at Free Press, to climate change activists at Energy Action, to anti-genocide activists at the EnoughProject--clearly worked the system to get questions they favored voted up into the top tier.
Here's how the Enough Project touts what they did:
Thanks to the overwhelming response from our readers, who amplified their support via Twitter and Facebook, and the help of partners like Change.org and Invisible Children, who blasted our message out to their masses of followers, Enough’s question landed at the top of the foreign policy category. Enough intern Alison did the honors, eloquently voicing our collective concerns to the president about the direction of U.S. policy toward Sudan.
So what if Obama's answers were mostly familiar? You have to start somewhere, and before we can get the White House to commit to a regular open event like this, we have to let them test the waters. One assumes they have a higher level of comfort with this approach now that they've done it once.
Same with the power of organized constituency groups to "game" the system. As I've written before, what other part of American democracy isn't also "gamed" by organized interests? There's nothing inherently bad about groups with large numbers of motivated members taking the time to express themselves about a topic, in the hopes that they will be able to get the President of the United States to talk about it, and thus raise the profile of their issue. For a long time, the only way to get your issue onto the national agenda was either by convincing the once-clubby world of Beltway journalists and pundits that it mattered, or by spending enough money to have the same effect. The Internet is a new channel, and a far more open one.
That said, we've still got a ways to go before we see the full potential of the Internet's media of abundance applied to politics and specifically to the topic of engaging the president or other politicians.
First, we need this kind of open forum to be a regular, scheduled event with some clear structure for how it will work. Right now, it makes a lot of sense for organized groups to try to flood the system of posting and voting up questions, because they have no idea when the next forum will be. Were Obama to commit to doing this, say, biweekly, the pressure to "win" a round of questions would go down. In addition, the White House communications team could make clear that it's not going to pick a top-voted question if it--or a close version of it--has already been asked. A regularization of the process could do much to draw out the less popular but equally valuable questions being raised by citizens.
Second, the White House and YouTube should each consider adding an overt feedback loop to enable viewers to improve the process. What did you think of President Obama's answer to each question? And how about inviting people who got their questions asked if they want to post a follow-up? As we saw when we conducted 10Questions.com, most politicians tend to use the Internet as another medium through which to simply broadcast their message. But knowing your answers will be rated and judged by your audience--in full public view--can alter that behavior to something more valuable. Similarly, Obama--or his surrogates--can post responses to those follow-ups.
Can civic innovation be managed statewide? A bill in Minnesota is betting yes. It is looking to grab some of the state's $1.2 billion surplus to fund open data, open government, and civic technology. Openminnesota.org, a site set up to promote and explain the bill, says the following: "Open Minnesota will build an engine for public open data use, civic technology creation engaging start-up companies and technology volunteers, and help hundreds more government units get cost-effectively connected to the best global open government lessons for local adaptation." GO
Property tax revenue makes up around a quarter of New York City's budget, but until now broader information about it has not been easily accessible. Users could only look up individual properties by entering lot and block information into a basic online form on a city website, and would have had to cross-reference that information with a building's address and other sources, explained Chris Whong, co-organizer of New York City's Code for America brigade betaNYC. "This data is much more powerful in the aggregate," he said. That's why, as part of last week's Code Across NYC hackathon, he along with several collaborators worked to develop an online platform "born out of curiosity" that maps New York City property data. GO
Facebook is an increasingly active political force in India. The company launched their Indian election tracker Tuesday to coincide with the first Facebook Talks Live digital broadcast, “Town Hall” style conversations in which 2014 candidates field questions submitted by Facebook users. These projects build on the get-out-the-vote collaboration between the Times of India and Facebook, which was announced in September.GO
Civic crowdfunding dreamed big but started small. The platform Neighbor.ly grabbed attention for a 2012 campaign to help fund a multi-million dollar rail car in Kansas City, but only raised $3,775 of its $10 million goal. The early campaigns of both Neighbor.ly and Citizinvestor that were actually successful reached for modest goals, usually less than $15,000. A look at the campaign pages of either platform today shows larger projects, in the tens or hundreds of thousands, creeping in as well. Civic crowdfunding is growing. To facilitate and attract more large projects Citizinvestor this week announced a plan to crowdfund projects in phases. GO
Thousands of documents float and sink in a remote reservoir not far from a grand 345-acre estate contained within a sprawling wrought iron fence. As evocative as it may seem, this not the beginning of a spy thriller, but of Yanukovych Leaks, an online portal where the leaks have been uploaded by investigative journalists who say the extravagance detailed in those papers may prove ousted President Viktor Yanukovych's depth of corruption. GO
In the video below, filmed during the Oslo Freedom Forum in May 2013, Jacob Appelbaum breaks it to Rafael Marques, an Angolan investigative journalist and anti-corruption activist, that his laptop is being surveilled through a crude backdoor in spite of the fact that he is using Tor. He opens up a file where they can see all the images that have been stored and are waiting to be collected by the hackers. Appelbaum tells an understandably concerned Marques: “Every computer that's targeted is compromisable,”GO
The EuroMaidan Revolution has passed the 100 day mark and Russian forces have taken control of parts of Crimea. The New York Times described the escalating conflict between Russia and the West as “reminiscent of low points in the Cold War.” The Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk has said that “we are on the brink of disaster.”GO