Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

The Strange Case of Meg's Domains

BY Nancy Scola | Friday, April 23 2010

Credit: MegWhitman.com. But it might as well be MegWhitmanforGovernor.com, MegWhitman2010.com...

Meg Whitman is the former head of eBay, a Republican candidate for governor of California, and the proud owner of such domain names as MegWhitmanforGovernor.com and MegWhitman2010.com -- but that wasn't always the case. Back in 2008, as Whitman was getting her ducks in a row to declare her candidacy, one duck she and her team let wander off was registering some obvious website addresses.

A Santa Monica man by the name of Thomas Hall, however, had the foresight to pick up those domains. Hall registered those, along with other Whitman-related URLs like Whitman2010.com, back in early 2008, when there were first rumblings that Whitman was considering a run. "I just thought it was kind of funny," Hall has said, though legal documents tell that Hall used the sites as ad farms. Hall reported spending about ten bucks a piece on the domains.

Whitman was not pleased. She took her case to the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization, where she argued that her name was the equivalent of a global service mark, given the "international recognition and wide publicizing of her fame and achievement" that left "Meg Whitman" inextricably linked to eBay in the public mind. Denied there, she took Hall to federal court under cybersquatting laws. Hall and Whitman eventually came to a settlement. Some estimate that between legal expenses and the Hall settlement, Whitman may have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars getting her hands on MegWhitmanforGovernor.com and the rest of the domains.

All of the domains mentioned above today redirect to MegWhitman.com, the official Whitman campaign site which also happens to the the least obviously campaign-y domain in the Whitman stable.

The interesting bit is that while Whitman wasn't an official candidate at the time those expenses where expended, those domain names stayed good (actually, were only good) once Whitman threw her hat in the ring. That has the LA Times asking today, in this brave new digital world, should money spent by a candidate on electronic assets like domain names count as campaign expenses down the line?

This whole Whitman situation also creates the opportunity to ask a semi-related question that's been on my mind: once Robert Gibbs is no longer White House press secretary, what becomes of @presssec?

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

First POST: Moneyballed

The Gates Foundation's new "global citizens" email database, and why it's a terrible idea; why young people like the NSA more than older people; using open data about NYC taxi drivers to ID Muslims; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Monkeying

Net neutrality proponents call foul on the GOP's plans; StandUnited.com seeks to be the right's Change.org; tons of civic tech news from mySociety, Chicago and Civic Hall in NYC; and much, much more. GO

wednesday >

First POST: Punch List

Obama's State of the Union and the Internet; how HealthCare.gov shares personal data with third-parties; Facebook says it will give users tools to tag false or hoax content in their News Feeds; and much, much more. GO

tuesday >

First POST: Goggles

More on the shifting net neutrality debate; how Ready for Hillary plans to share its digital assets; the family roots of Civic Hall; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Urgency

How Republicans are starting to embrace net neutrality; more predictions of the blockchain's impact on society; new "innovative communities" legislation in Massachusetts seeks to boost civic tech there; and much, much more. GO

More