Retracing the Road to that Roberts Rumor
BY Nancy Scola | Friday, March 5 2010
Point proven? Above the Law traces the origins of the John Roberts retirement rumor that spread about the Internet yesterday back to a Georgetown Law professor who floated the fake news as part of a class lesson on how what seem like credible sources might actually turn out to be engaging in somewhat questionable pedagogy! ABT quotes a 1L in the professor's class:
Today’s class was partially on the validity of informants not explaining their sources. [Professor Tague] started off class at around 9 am EST by telling us not to tell anyone, but that we might find it interesting that tomorrow, Roberts would be announcing his retirement for health concerns. He refused to tell anyone how he knew. Then, at around 9:30, he let everyone in on the joke.
The time between the prof's dropping of the Roberts retirement "news" and a posting of the rumor on Radar? ("EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Considering Stepping Down.") Ten minutes. The time between when the professor let his kids in on the ruse and a Radar retraction? Six minutes. You almost get whiplash. Seems like the good professor might have wanted to institute a no-texting/no-emailing/no-iPhone/no-Blackberry rule before running his little classroom experiment.
Now some tech apologists might take a look at that episode and say "what's the problem?" The rumor was floated, shot down, and corrected within an hour. What's the damage, really? It'd be interesting to hear from Roberts whether he, in his heart of hearts, sees some sort of long-term and lasting ill effects from the gossip. It seems likely that part of the evolution of this wild and crazy news world is that we'll all learn to be more incredulous about things that seem farfetched, even if they are marked "exclusive." We learned that much from the whole Perez Hilton/Fidel Castro mess, didn't we? But really, it's tough to draw much more meaning from this little case study than the fact that (1) 1Ls are guilible and that (2) the good folks at Radar, who consider themselves journalists, should really think twice about considering "my professor told us in class this morning" a hard and fast source.
The silver lining of all this, though, is that #radarheadlines was a pretty funny Twitter meme while it lasted -- which was all of a few hours.
