Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

The power of serendipitous findability

BY Micah L. Sifry | Sunday, March 22 2009

[Last Wednesday, I pinch-hit for Clay Shirky (who was homebound with bronchitis) at the inaugural gathering of "The Little Idea," the spawn of Ari and Jonathan Melber, who dreamed up the notion of getting a bunch of folks together in a bar to hear one person speak for ten minutes, no Q&A, and then much imbibing. Here's a slightly polished version of my remarks.]

How many of you get twitchy when you can’t check your email or your mobile or your Twitter or Facebook account? How many of you are thinking right now, I wish I had my laptop? How many of you have ever experienced losing your device, or having to send it away for repair?

It feels like a lost limb, no?

Well I’m here to say it’s all for the good that you’re feeling twitchy.

That twitch makes me optimistic about the future. Why?

Three reasons.

1. Because I believe in the power of a small group of people to change the world. As Margaret Mead said, nothing else ever has.
2. Because I believe that the more we decentralize control of information and increase our abilities to dig up facts, the better decisions we’ll make.
3. Because a lot of us are deciding to live more of our lives in public and as a result, pool our brains.

But why am I more optimistic now than at any time in my life? Because I think we’ve never had such good small-group making tools or such good information-connecting tools. We’re developing a global social nervous system. As a result, I think bull-shit is in trouble.

And it’s all because of serendipitous findability—the odds that you will fortuitously connect with someone you don’t know but share an interest with, or the odds that you will learn something timely or surprising or valuable to you.

That’s what the twitch is about: improving the odds of a chance meeting: Chance meetings between people, and chance meetings between facts, and chance meetings between people and facts.

Interactive communications technology is all about upping the odds of a chance meeting. It’s the combination of search + living in public that makes this possible.

Five years ago, I wrote an article for The Nation called “The Rise of Open Source Politics,” which was all about the ways that I thought open source practices and culture were beginning to affect the political arena. While I’m not entirely sure that original meaning of “open source” can be directly applied from the software development world to politics, the phrase had a certain evocative power, which was good.

But here’s what’s important to me. Because some tiny number of people are intensely interested in the intersection of “open source” and politics,” they’ve googled that phrase and, thanks to the power of search and living in public, they’ve found me. Just as important, I’ve found them. And while not every one of them has turned into a life-long friend or collaborator, these chance meetings have been enormously valuable overall. People found my needle in their haystack and now we’re connected.

I think we’re living in a time where serendipitous findability is happening for more people, and chance meetings leading to powerful collaborations are happening more often. That’s why I’m optimistic about the future.

We all know the saying “Information is Power.” But that’s not true. Information isn’t power. Disproportionate access to information is power. Me knowing something about you that you’d prefer to keep secret…or me knowing which congressional staffer’s spouse works for which defense contractor…or me knowing that the FDA is about to approve a company’s drug application…me being able to Google a panelist while we’re at the same event, dig up their campaign contributions and share them with the audience...these are all examples of power.

But now we’re all getting a little more access to information. And we’re rewarding each other for making good connections with that information.

If you haven’t noticed, the geeks are inheriting the earth. That’s because they’re especially good at this. Josh Marshall, Nate Silver, Ari Melber—what do they have in common? They’re nerds. Well, maybe not Ari, he’s more of a stud than a nerd. But we feed these guys because they feed the network…and they make us all smarter, and collectively they’re helping us (and we’re helping them) beat back the bullshit.

When I decide to follow you or friend you, it’s because it’s helping make me smarter. Presumably, you feel the same way. We’re bolstering our serendipitous findability.

This event is a chance meeting.

You tweeting about this event, and someone stumbling across this idea, is a chance meeting.

That person offering me a $500K book deal to write about this idea, that would be a chance meeting too…[bad joke]

Remember the old radical 60s saying, “Only connect”?

Go connect.

[I am indebted to this post by Punya Mishra on "ambient findability" for helping inspire and focus these thoughts. And I have no idea who Punya Mishra is, but it was a chance meeting online that led me to him.]

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

yesterday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

Team Obama Spends Big On Digital

There's more to come from recently filed campaign finance reports from the presidential campaigns. Meantime, Politico notes that Barack Obama's re-election effort has so far spent $2.2 million in online advertising, millions more on payroll and $809,000 on computer equipment and software. GO

tuesday >

Romney Campaign to Test Out Square Tonight

As Nick Bilton noted last night, the Mitt Romney campaign plans to test out Square for fund-raising at a Florida event tonight. A spokeswoman for Barack Obama's re-election campaign told us yesterday that Obama campaign staffers and select volunteers around the country would be getting the devices, which attach to mobile phones and work as credit card readers, as well as custom software that collects the information necessary for donations to be compliant with Federal Election Commission requirements.

Update: Now with screenshots!

GO

How Much Should a Campaign Know About an Online Volunteer?

Rick Santorum's campaign is asking folks to go online and make calls today on the former senator from Pennsylvania's behalf. Earlier this morning I noted that Mitt Romney's team is doing the same.

One ongoing discussion around this type of tool is how much the campaign should know about the volunteer before the volunteer is allowed to, well, volunteer. Mitt Romney's campaign just asks for a name and email address. Santorum's campaign requires volunteers to put in a full address before it starts revealing to users of their click-to-call tool the names and phone numbers of prospective voters. It's an additional step to protect voters' privacy — and to get more data for the campaign — although it isn't difficult for tricksters to use a fake or inaccurate address in a form like this.

GO

More