Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

One Less Lonely Gov

BY Nick Judd | Thursday, November 18 2010

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie

Not sure how I missed this last Friday, but Slate's David Weigel suggests that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's new media savvy makes him the Justin Bieber of the political world:

He makes news less for his specific accomplishments, more for viral videos of himself taking names, which are rebroadcast on conservative sites, talk radio, and cable news. [Outgoing Minnesota Gov. Tim] Pawlenty's communications team tried, and partly succeeded, in drawing national attention to a win he pulled out on the 2010 state budget, but there was no visual excitement. A single video of him taking on critics at a town hall would have made more of an impression with national Tea Party activists than what he got from that, a Politico cover story on his tricky political win. Christie's team realize that winning fame as a national politician is not altogether different than winning fame as a budding Canadian pop star.

Weigel also suggests that no other governor has a similar grasp of new media or online video. That's an interesting assertion and it'll be worth watching to see if it's true even after the three dozen governors elected or re-elected this year take office in January, armed with new-media practices tested on the campaign trail. But there's another difference at play here. Christie's strategy is not just one that uses new media to get his face out there, but one of, as Weigel observes, direct engagement. He's trading off of his interactivity. (Sidenote: There's another New Jersey politician who does that very well — Christie's favorite partner-from-across-the-aisle, Newark Mayor Cory Booker.)

Is this just the way a potential presidential contender behaves? Well, not really, is one subtext of Weigel's juxtaposition of Christie with Pawlenty — the Minnesota governor's name is also out there as a Republican presidential possibility in 2012.

Christie is even more of an outlier by dint of the number of videos on his YouTube channel that are television appearances. This election year was notable for the sheer number of candidates who avoided the national stage, who refused to engage, who stayed away from mediated public forums like debates or editorial board interviews. The suggestion was that candidates were avoiding forums where they might make a mistake, might not find a friendly audience, or would be interacting with the public in a situation where they did not make the rules. On a Facebook fan page, message discipline is one delete button away (UPDATE: As Slate well knows, natch) — but an appearance on "Meet the Press" could really throw you off your talking points, if you're not careful.

Maybe the difference here is not that Christie's team knows how to use new media to capitalize on the way their boss engages with people, especially ones who don't agree with him, and especially in situations he does not control. Maybe the difference here is that their boss engages with people who disagree with him in the first place.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

NYC Open Data Advocates Focus on Quality And Value Over Quantity

The New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications plans to publish more than double the amount of datasets this year than it published to the portal last year, new Commissioner Anne Roest wrote last week in an annual report mandated by the city's open data law, with 135 datasets scheduled to be released this year, and almost 100 more to come in 2015. But as preparations are underway for City Council open data oversight hearings in the fall, what matters more to advocates than the absolute number of the datasets is their quality. GO

Civic Tech and Engagement: Announcing a New Series on What Makes it "Thick"

Announcing a new series of feature articles that we will be publishing over the next several months, thanks to the support of the Rita Allen Foundation. Our focus is on digitally-enabled civic engagement, and in particular, how and under what conditions "thick" digital civic engagement occurs. What we're after is answers to this question: When does a tech tool or platform enable actual people to make ongoing and significant contributions to each other, to a place or cause, at a scale that produces demonstrable change? GO

More