Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Obama's New HealthCare.gov: A Look at What's Inside

BY Nancy Scola | Thursday, July 1 2010

The Obama Administration today launched HealthCare.gov, an online information navigator called for by the health care reform bill signed by the President 90 days ago today.

The day President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law, the clock started ticking on 90 days for federal health officials to build out a way for the American public to get online access to critical information on the health insurance plans available to them, and the other health care options open to them under the new law. Those 90 days were up today. Presenting the brand-new HealthCare.gov, launched early this morning.

We'll take a quick look at what's inside the new site, but first, a word about context. The health care overhaul bill, was, of course, a landmark moment in the Obama presidency thus far. The opportunity that HealthCare.gov hands the Obama Administration is a chance to first, of course, help the American people, but also to implement, iterate, and sell a new way of doing health care in 21st century America, one informed by the principles of user interface design, information presentation, and a savvy negotiation of the Internet that was once thought to be a defining characteristic of the Obama way of doing things.

HealthCare.gov could, done right, improve the quality of life for millions of Americans. HealthCare.gov could make navigating the complexities of modern American life a little more manageable, a little less frightening. HealthCare.gov could, by empowering him or her with clear and transparent information, shift the balance of power a little bit away from the insurance industry and back towards the American citizen. But HealthCare.gov might also have electoral aftereffects, as a constant, living reminder of how the Obama brand politics is making things better for real people.

Enough with that. Let's look at what's inside.

The first of two simple screens that make up the survey portion of HealthCare.gov's insurance option selector.

The Department of Health and Human Services, charged with building out HealthCare.gov, under the direction of Chief Technology Officer Todd Parks, describes the site as "the first website to collect both public and private health insurance options across the nation in a single place." They go on. "Even better, our insurance options finder automatically sorts through this huge catalog of options to help you identify the ones that may be right for you." Elsewhere, HHS makes the case that "Healthcare.gov lets you take health care into your own hands." The corner stone of the site is the found under the "Find Insurance Options" tab. The entry screen is, by design, drop-dead simple.

Next, the HealthCare.gov user is asked for a few key piece of information; a healthy individual from New York, for example, is asked for her age, medical conditions, ability to afford insurance, and whether she's losing insurance or simply searching for a new plan.

From there, a user is presented with his or her best options:

The health care options presented to a healthy New Yorker.

A truly important bit, of course, is information on the private insurance plans available to him or her. Some of HealthCare.gov's more important work is taking place behind the scenes. Under the health care bill, HHS had until about a month ago to "develop a standardized format to be used for the presentation of information relating to...coverage options." In other words, the federal government has been building out a format for insurance choices that makes apples-to-apples comparisons possible.

A sample option delivered to our example New Yorker-based user of HealthCare.gov:

HealthCare.gov presents health care plan information in a grid format -- but no pricing details yet. That's planned for October of this year.


Dotted around HealthCare.gov are widgets asking for feedback on how the site can be made better.

There's a good chance that your eye was drawn to the yellow box on the right end there, and there's good reason for that. A key piece of information is, at this point, missing. HealthCare.gov is slated to have pricing information on each plan option by October of this fall, but it's not there yet. Those prices will be estimates, so people will still need to check with the insurance offerer to nail down a final cost. Those involved with the site are well aware that it is beta, a first-draft, to-be-improved. That that end, the important parts of the site feature built-in feedback widget that make it trivial for Americans to let the government know where HealthCare.gov isn't living up to its potential.

And there are holes. A senior from New Jersey, for example, finds that his or her third of three options for coverage is simply a "Final Note" that directs them to contact their state department of insurance to see if there might be other relevant programs or protections, but there's no phone number, website, or other way of getting in touch with New Jersey's state insurance experts. Even more problematic is that plans with the very same name but different enrollment codes are offered up as separate options -- with no help on figuring out what's unique about each choice.

A timeline showing the planned implementation of the health care reform bill.

There's more to HealthCare.gov than the insurance plan finder. The site also includes updates on the implementation of the health care act and what comes next, resources on healthy living customized for individual circumstances, and details on how changes triggered by the act might impact your particular health care situation.

Ultimately, figuring out whether HealthCare.gov is a useful tool or window dressing requires people running their personal circumstances through its processes, and seeing if they do end up knowing more about their own health care options than they otherwise would. Which raises the question: if you build it, how do you get them to come? How does the White House and broader Obama Administration drive the American public towards making use of the new HealthCare.gov? Can the White House buy Google ads on health-care related trigger words? I've put the question to the White House, and have not yet heard anything back.

That said, HealthCare.gov's best chance at visibility and success is in simply proving itself useful to people as they navigate the health care landscape. The first Google result for "nursing home" is, for example, a link to the government-run Nursing Home Compare site, used by many make informed nursing home choices for themselves and the people they care about.

One thing to keep in mind is that a successful HealthCare.gov would be something that a President Obama leaves to history, or at least the next presidency -- a persistent structural change to the landscape of American life. Last summer, I interviewed Swarthmore psychologist Barry Schwartz, author of the book The Paradox of Choice about the intersection of user interface and government, in the context of a world overflowing with data, numbers, knowledge. He said at the time, "The challenge we have now is to shape how we navigate that information in meaningful ways." He went on. “The people who truly figure that out...are going to be the ones to run the world." My kicker, at the time, was "Perhaps they already are." Are they? Stay tuned.

More: The Department of Health and Human Services offers this video introduction to the new HealthCare.gov:

Update: Calling the site "slick" and "easy-to-use," Ezra Klein points out that much of the health reform bill doesn't kick in until 2014, giving plenty of time for folks to work out some of the more complicated bits. Though, I will stay, the purpose of HealthCare.gov isn't, under the law, just to help people make sense of the coming exchanges, but the current insurance landscape, too.

News Briefs

RSS Feed yesterday >

What Twitter Won't Tell You About the Election

A new study released on Tuesday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press on Tuesday offers the opportunity to get real about what the political conversation on Twitter and Facebook can — or can't — tell you about the progression of the 2012 political campaign. Pew has found that even among users of Twitter and Facebook, a paltry percentage of people use social networks to get news about politics: Only 24 percent of Twitter users in the sample and 25 percent of Facebook users said they "sometimes" got campaign news through that network, while a full 40 percent of Twitter users in the sample and 46 percent of other social media users reported "never" getting campaign news through either Twitter or Facebook. GO

Navigating New York's "Road Map for the Digital City," One Year In

In May 2011, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg revealed a "Road Map for the Digital City," a plan to use technology to make city government more and participatory, and to leverage the city's tech sector for economic and civic gains.

New York City Chief Digital Officer Rachel Sterne will join our editorial director, Micah Sifry, on a conference call this Friday afternoon to discuss the progress on that road map so far. The call is free and open to anyone to join. You can sign up here.

GO

tuesday >

Pete Hoekstra's Campaign Website's "Offensive" Source Code Changed After Outcry

As if "chop suey fonts" and obvious graphic allusions to the stereotype of the Chinese as the Yellow Peril weren't controversial enough, the group that created an incendiary microsite for former Rep. Pete Hoekstra's campaign has managed to further fan the flames with what it's calling a mistake in its code. GO

Fidel Castro Loves the Internet

“The Internet is a revolutionary instrument that permits the receiving and transmission of ideas, in both directions, that is something we should know how to use,” Fidel Castro told a crowd of supporters on Feb. 4, according to the state-owned Cuban newspaper Granma International. Castro, who made his first public appearance since April 2011, launched his two-volume memoir, “Guerilla of Time,” and took the opportunity to discuss issues of importance to him. Earlier this week, Miranda Neubauer reported that one of these topics was the need for the Internet. Castro has been a proponent of the Internet as a tool for the exchange of ideas since 2003, but the average Cuban citizen faces great difficulty getting online. GO

Claire McCaskill Hires Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner As Digital Director

Missouri's senior Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill has hired Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner as its digital director. GO

Controversial Hoekstra Microsite Targeting Debbie Stabenow Created By The Prosper Group

Michigan Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra has caused a firestorm in the past 24 hours with a new campaign ad that depicts China as a young woman riding a bike in a rural area speaking in broken English. The thirty second spot aired in Michigan during the Super Bowl on Sunday, and it accuses Democratic incumbent Debbie Stabenow of aiding ... GO

White House CTO Aneesh Chopra's Exit Interview

On his way out of the White House and back to Virginia, where he is expected to run for public office — but will neither confirm or deny that's the plan — Aneesh Chopra describes the shape of the post he pioneered as the country's first-ever chief technology officer.

As a result of Chopra's interview with The Atlantic's tech/politics correspondent, Nancy Scola, there's now a public record of what this first-ever CTO thinks the CTO's job actually is ("On any topic that is a priority for the president, my role is evaluate how technology, data, and innovation can advance, support, and improve upon those strategies," among other things) and how it might be improved.

GO

friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

More