Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Measuring Social Media Impact: vs. Google Analytics

BY Alan Rosenblatt | Friday, April 23 2010

If you are using social media to raise awareness about your campaign or organization, you are likely to be sharing links there back to your website. Measuring the impact of this effort, no doubt, is high on your list of priorities. While click-throughs to your website is by no means the most important measure of success for your social media program--that honor goes to engaging your audience on social media--it is still important to drive some of your audience home.

One of the most popular ways to measure click-throughs from Twitter and other social media outreach (especially Twitter, given in 140 character limit) is the URL shortener not only shortens your URL, but it also tracks how many people have clicked on any link to that destination web page. And if you register an account with (free), you can track how many times your specific link was clicked.

The problem, as Jay Rosen reported last summer, is that compared to other web metrics services, reports more clicks.

Our own experience at the Center for American Progress/Center for American Progress Action Fund has been that reports many more clicks than Google Analytics reports page views for the same page. As we use to measure the impact of our social media outreach program and Google Analytics to measure traffic to our website, the discrepancy is a problem that affects our ability to compare how well our social media outreach compares to our email outreach and other sources of traffic to our websites.

In order to better understand the differences between the two data sources and figure out how to reconcile them, we conducted an experiment:

We created a test webpage that was not publicized, not linked to from any other web page on our websites. We then created a corresponding link ( data for this link can be viewed here.

Initial returns from our test revealed that accurately measures clicks and Google Analytics understates page views.

Details for the test are as follows:

  • First we did a controlled internal test to confirm that recorded the number of clicks accurately. We clicked through the link several times and visually confirmed that registered the exact number of clicks we performed.
  • Then we recruited people via Twitter to click on the link in two waves. One group did so before April 20, 2010. The other clicked through after April 20, 2010.
  • For the first group, our test produced 20 clicks as reported by and 16 reported by Google Analytics. For this group, Google Analytics reported 80.0% of the clicks reported by
  • For the second group, reported 43 clicks and Google Analytics reported 30 views of the test page we created. For this group, Google Analytics reported only 69.8% of the clicks reported by
  • Combining both test runs, Bitl.y reports 63 clicks and Google Analytics reports 46 page views. Thus, Google Analytics reported only 73.0% of the clicks reported by across the entire test.

Based on our experiment, we can conclude:

  • accurately records exactly the number of clicks (not unique visitors) through to the URL, and
  • Google Analytics understates the number of page views by an estimated 27%.

We did notice that the second wave of the test showed Google Analytics lagging further behind than the first test, suggesting the possibility that as the number of clicks on get larger, the gap between and Google Analytics may grow. The only way to determine if this is true is to continue to collect more clicks on our link.

The next two steps to solidify the finding of this experiment are 1) for more people to click on our test link ( and 2) for other people to run their own experiments and report back the results (you can post them as comments here, to help everyone better understand this issue).

Finally, it is important that people note that the visually confirmed results that does record clicks accurately justifies the continued use of to report these statistics, until evidence to the contrary is provided. That our results suggest that has fixed whatever problem Jay Rosen identified last summer can only be confirmed by

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.