Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

A Legislative Framework in Place, Oklahoma Says OK to Open Data

BY Nick Judd | Friday, February 11 2011

Oklahoma joined the ranks of states with open data portals this week when launched on Wednesday.

The portal launch is a splashy public milestone in the long, dull, and generally boring-but-important process of modernizing how a state does business and interacts with its constituents. State Rep. Jason Murphey, a Republican who represents Guthrie in the statehouse, told me Wednesday that the public data portal is the result of a legislative framework and a lot of pre-requisite work, the bulk of which happened last year.

"What we did was we have an existing board at the state level that assists agencies with web-based [or] related subjects," Murphey told me. "They have some regulatory power over state agencies' access to the state portal."

Last year, the state legislature established a framework that required that board — the state's Governmental Technology Review Board, with appointees selected by the legislature and the governor — to give state agencies open technology standards to provide "web-based interactivity to state government services;" a schedule to agencies would have to follow to provide information to the public through open data in standard formats and through APIs; allowing the board to hold apps contests; and creating a mechanism for the public to apply for state agencies to make specific data sets public in this fashion, rather than available only through freedom of information law requests.

This is a major public milestone in that process, Murphey told me.

"I think this is our first baby step," he said. "The idea was, let's just get the framework in place ... I can't tell that there's, like, a statewide statutory framework in place, actually, in any other state."

In fact, one is in the works in New Hampshire, where another group of technology-minded legislators is also rewiring government in ways that force it to adopt the kinds of standard practices and processes that software developers want.

Gov20Radio was the first one with the launch of the open data portal in Oklahoma, and has had some of the people inside Oklahoma who made this happen — state Rep. Jason Murphey, CIO Alex Pettit and Sid Burgess, a House appointee on the state's Governmental Technology Review Board — on its programs in the past. The state announced the launch in a press release on Thursday.

But the real story here isn't the open data portal — that's a feature, so to speak, not the application itself. The takeaway for state-level open government geeks and people who want to make state governments more efficient and transparent actually seems to be that using legislation to do it is an effective approach, and there are enough legislators in statehouses now of the right age and acumen — Murphey, 33, runs a business that does development for content management systems, and he counts State Rep. David Derby, a 32-year-old forensic chemist, and State Sen. Clark Jolley, a 40-year-old lawyer, among his colleagues in the legislature who are working to use technology to improve government efficiency — to get it passed.

And while transparency initiatives in New Hampshire and Oklahoma stem primarily from Republican-sponsored legislation, that isn't always the case. In New Hampshire, state lawmaker Seth Cohn, one of the people involved in writing the laws in the works, says initiatives there stem from a very libertarian-minded philosophy that views transparency as a means to keep tabs on, and shrink, government. Murphey described the same desires, but does not paint himself as libertarian, per se: Open data, Murphey says, could lead to metrics that would allow the state to track employee efficiency, make better policy decisions and make them more quickly, and more closely track the results of procurement decisions.

(Update: Murphey was not as vocal about libertarian ideals in my conversations with him, but like Cohn, endorsed Ron Paul for President.)

In New York, a group of staff brought in by the Democratic state Senate leadership made the senate more open — rather than the state — in efforts to increase accountability and access.

The Oklahoma state legislature was not likely to transform itself to be similarly open, Murphey admitted to me. But he has a bill in the works that would make the legislature more transparent.

"Traditionally, legislatures, we have a closed caucus system and so you have a part of government that takes place behind closed doors where legislators can take a private position behind closed doors and take another position in public," Murphey said. "That's a luxury some legislators really guard and my bill does away with that."

I asked Murphey if he the legislature had discussed making the bill and legislator data it already made public through its bill search portal more developer-friendly, similar to what New Hampshire is doing, by releasing a nightly data dump, or New York, which offers an improved search engine. Murphey said the Oklahoma legislature hadn't considered it, but could.

"That's something we could hardwire into the law," he said.

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.