Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Learning from Obama's Online Outreach: How To Find and Build Support on the Internet

BY Colin Delany | Monday, March 16 2009

Part Three of a six-part series, cross-posted on e.politics

With a team in place and technology under development, the Obama campaign wasted no time in building their most important resource: the list of volunteers who would work to elect the Illinois senator president. And just as the campaign would use new media tools to encourage voter turnout and other action in the real world, they employed real-world events to build their list of online activists:

Field teams used various tactics, including collecting addresses at events, via online advertising and by offering incentives such as a free bumper sticker in exchange for contact information. Often, after collecting addresses, follow-up emails steered people to MyBarackObama.com, where they could find information on how to host events themselves.

"Obama's Road To White House Was Paved With Emails," David Goetzl, Online Media Daily, December 9, 2008

Once again, integration was key -- from the "BarackObama.com" backdrops at speeches to the prominent placement of the URL on yard signs to block-walkers trudging around their neighborhoods, offline recruiting yielded online activism, which in turn yielded more recruiting in the physical world. For all the attention we'll pay to online outreach, remember that much of the work of building Obama's online supporter list took place face-to-face.

Online Video

Of course, if you can't reach someone in person, often video is the next best thing. It's immediate, it's engaging, and it tends to evoke a much stronger emotional response than text and images alone -- video feels more "real." And the campaign used video extensively: from very early in the race, Obama's team already included a videographer and screenwriter/producer squad to shoot footage both for internal/documentary purposes and (more importantly) for use in public as a persuasive tool. By November 4th, they'd posted some 1800 separate clips on YouTube, generating over one BILLION minutes of total viewership.

Many of the videos (such as David Plouffe's periodic online briefings) were intended for existing volunteers, but others were designed to deliver targeted messages to specific groups of potential supporters. And as with so many other online outreach tools, supporters took the reins themselves, in some cases creating pro-Obama videos that were seen millions of times. But even the ones that WEREN'T seen by millions mattered: the internet is an endless sea of niches, and not only was it impossible for campaign to target every possible interest or audience, they didn't need to -- their supporters were busy doing it for them, and in their own (authentic) voices. My own sister-in-law switched her allegiance from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama in part because she watched a video created by Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford law professor and online thinker whom she greatly respects.

Online Social Networks

If you've read some of the more breathless coverage of the internet's role in 2008, you might get the idea that Facebook and MySpace were the beginning and the end of online politics. And it's true that Obama and the other presidential campaigns found these sites to be fertile soil for supporter harvesting, at the very least because so many Americans are on them for hours a day. It's a classic observation: if you want to find supporters, go where they spend their time -- and a lot of people spend time on social networking websites. But the Obamans kept public socnets in perspective, investing resources in them but not to a distracting extent, and working hard to move new recruits found their into the campaign's overall volunteer structure:

Obama limited his official presence to 15 [online social networks] and leveraged these platforms to direct people to the MyBO Web site, where the campaign had a greater ability to channel people to the specific activities and causes that were deemed the most important to fulfilling the campaign's electoral strategy.

"The Social Pulpit: Barack Obama's Social Media Toolkit," Edelman Digital Public Affairs, January 2009

But the campaign's own official presence was only a slice of the pro-Obama activity these sites hosted, since those millions of "friends" were also working as evangelists on their own:

For instance, while Obama had more than three million Facebook friends, supporters also used the tools that they were familiar with in Facebook to find creative ways to spread the message in support of his candidacy. More than 900,000 people joined the "One Million Strong for Obama" group on Facebook. There were Facebook groups for Obama for almost every college in America. The campaign leveraged participation on these existing networks to reinforce messages across platforms and create as many touch points as possible.

"The Social Pulpit: Barack Obama's Social Media Toolkit," Edelman Digital Public Affairs, January 2009

Besides its main Facebook "Fan Page" and the "One Million Strong" group, the campaign actively encouraged supporters to create their own Facebook Groups based on location or interest, realizing that these separate groups expanded Obama's outreach rather than diluted it. The campaign also created a Facebook Application for fans to add to their profiles -- like a badge or a button but with constantly updated messaging -- which spread the campaign's words directly through natural social channels as friends interacted with friends.

The Obama campaign invested in other site-specific tools besides the Facebook App. MySpace allows users to customize their profile pages to a much greater extent than Facebook, so Obama's staff created an array of buttons, badges and widgets for supporters to add -- like virtual yard signs, they advertised the candidate by just sitting there on a page. The Obamans' ultimate goal on all of these sites was to use to use each Facbook/MySpace supporter's profile page as a communications hub within that supporter's own social circle, building up up volunteers and donors friend-to-friend.

And as the campaign worked in other social networks such as Black Planet, they adapted their approach to meet the particular rules, requirements and customs of that site -- every network is different and requires a different approach. Of course, it didn't always work smoothly, as when the professional staff took over a volunteer's MySpace page early in the campaign and encountered a sharp backlash. But that stumble and any others were only minor hurdles -- and unlike John McCain, at least Obama didn't have his MySpace profile hacked.

Email

For all their popularity, social networking sites still don't reach everyone online, and I suspect that they achieved some of their media prominence in 2008 because they're visible -- you can SEE how many "friends" Barack Obama has, and you can SEE it when thousands of people change their middle names on Facebook to "Hussein" as a gesture of solidarity against Republican attempts to brand Obama as "other." But just about everyone with internet access uses email, regardless of age, and research from the E-Voter Institute published in the summer of 2008 found that people were significantly more likely to send or forward political email than they were to become evangelists on Facebook or MySpace.

Another data point: many websites (including Epolitics.com) use the "ShareThis" widget to encourage readers to forward content or post it to social sites, and stats published by the folks at ShareThis in August of 2008 showed that email-forwarding still dominated their widget's use across the web. We'll never know how many Obama supporters bombarded their friends and relatives with emails on his behalf, but we shouldn't forget them or discount their ultimate effect because their work was invisible to outsiders.

Online Advertising

By November of 2008, Obama's new media team had spent some $16 million to buy ad space on the web, most of it devoted to list-building:

The presidential hopefuls relied on Web ads almost entirely for building supporter lists and garnering donations. Obama's ubiquitous "Join Us" call-to-action drove supporters to his site to sign up to volunteer, throw debate-watching parties, attend local campaign events, and, yes, donate. His campaign raked in millions of small payments from online donors, and we can assume much of that cash came in as a result of search and display ads and e-mails sent to those joiners.

"Web Ads Mattered More than Ever in '08 Election," Kate Kaye, ClickZ, Nov 4, 2008

The campaign did run some influence-the-discussion display ads, for instance on the websites of major media outlets after candidate debates, but they focused on the practical goal of list-building. And that meant search ads: new media team head Joe Rospars has said that search ads yielded a Return On Investment of 10- or 15-fold, presumably measured in campaign contributions. And though they purchased ads on some issue-based keywords, they found that ads targeted to the obvious searches for "Barack Obama" were steadily and consistently effective. As elections approached, their strategy shifted somewhat:

As voting time drew near during the primaries, the Obama camp targeted ads to specific states, suggesting people click through to learn more about early voting, or find their local polling places. The same went for geo-targeted ads from both the Democratic National Committee and Obama's campaign seen in recent months; those promoted voter registration and early voting. Obama's ads pushing early voting even appeared in online games leading up to the election.

"Web Ads Mattered More than Ever in '08 Election," Kate Kaye, ClickZ, Nov 4, 2008

Many other political communicators working in both the electoral and advocacy spaces have found search/contextual ads to be extremely effective for list-building, and they're likely to be a first consideration for online political advertisers in the next few years.

Political Blogs

Remember 2004, when blogs were the darlings of the political world, king-makers in the waiting? Fast-forward a few years and every one of the major political campaigns dedicated time and resources to reaching out to bloggers and their communities of readers. Many candidates "wrote" (i.e., probably had their staff write) posts for prominent blogs, hosted conference calls for bloggers and paid close attention to what bloggers and commenters were saying about them. The Obama campaign was no exception, but to a great extent, it didn't NEED the political blogs -- because it was building its own independent base of zealous supporters.

In a sense, Obama could do an end-run around the top-level progressive blogs, adding their readers to his own network by reaching them through other channels. He didn't ignore the blogs, but he could afford to keep them in their rightful place -- as particularly influential voices and as gathering places for potential supporters, but not as the be-all and end-all of online outreach.

Catching 'em When They Come to You

Of course, for all of this outreach, plenty of Obama donors and volunteers reached him on their own, either through a web search or by going directly to BarackObama.com. And as we discussed in the introduction, the site was set up as a supporter-grabbing machine, encouraging visitors to sign up from their first click on the site. BarackObama.com was easy to find, easy to navigate and provided links to volunteer tools on essentially every page -- its designers tried never to miss a chance to turn a visitor into an evangelist.

Next up: once all those supporters were on the list, how did the Obama campaign put them to work?

In This Series:

Links will go live as articles are published.

cpd

News Briefs

RSS Feed tuesday >

First POST: Company

The global "Snowden effect" is huge; how many consumer-facing online services fail the user privacy test; the Dems' 2016 digital to-do list; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Mood Slime

The Sony email leak reveals the MPAA's campaign against Google; how Uber is lobbying in local markets; mapping the #MillionsMarchNYC; and much, much more. GO

friday >

First POST: Cloudy

What the Internet is not; new analysis of public opinion on net neutrality; how cloud backup apparently foiled a police coverup; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Records

Is the future of citizen journalism vigilantism?; one tech mogul's vocal support for CIA torture; a cri de couer from the founder of the Pirate Bay; and much, much more. GO

Web Index Sees Impact of Net Neutrality, Surveillance and Copyright Laws

Denmark, Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have come out on top of the Web Index, a ranking of the Web Foundation measuring the economic, social and political benefit that countries gain from the web. The United States is at number six. For the authors of the report accompanying the index, the results reflect how inequality has an impact on access to the web. "Nordic policy-makers have been quick to adopt and promote the free Internet - and open access to information - as a 21st century public good," the report states. " Others, as this year's findings show, need to move fast to catch up." The report attributes the Scandinavian countries' advantage to the countries' broader efforts to invest in public goods and establish a welfare and acting against " excess concentrations of wealth and power." With the lower inequality in those countries than in others, "the skills, means and freedoms to benefit from new technologies are widespread, which helps to explain why Scandinavian countries score highly on the political, social and economic impact of the Web GO

More