Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

With Iraq Attack Footage, Wikileaks Puts Up a Challenge to U.S. Military

BY Nancy Scola | Tuesday, April 6 2010

Credit: CollateralMurder.com

Wikileaks.com, the online information clearinghouse that we recently reported has been targeted by governments around the world for publishing sensitive materials, is playing host to video footage that calls into serious question a U.S. military explanation of a spring 2007 attack in the neighborhood of New Baghdad that left up to a dozen people dead, including two Iraqi employees of the news agency Reuters, Namir Noor-Eldeen, a 22 year old photographer, and Saeed Chmagh, a 40 year old driver and assistant.

Much like the "friendly-fire" incident that claimed the life of NFL star Pat Tillman in Afghanistan in 2004, the 2007 New Baghdad attack has been caught in a swirl of differing explanations. Since the attack three years ago, Reuters has been attempting to track down information on what went down that day through official channels, including Freedom of Information Act requests. But the organization ran smack into a U.S. military explanation that framed the engagement as an incident where U.S. military personnel in Apache helicopters directed fire on insurgents. "There is no question that Coalition Forces were clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force," said a spokesperson at the time. Reuters rejected the conclusivity of that conclusion, particulary when it came to the activities of two of its employees working in a war zone. "Our preliminary investigation raises real questions about whether there was fighting at the time the two men were killed," said David Schlesinger, Reuters' editor in chief.

Try as they might, Reuters hadn't gotten far with their official proddings -- until Wikileaks posted the video footage on a dedicate site called CollateralMurder.com.

The site features both a 40-minute video of the incident and an abbreviated 10-minute segment. Wikileaks also posted a transcript of the the military helicopters' transmissions, where military personnel can be heard identifying -- mistakenly -- it seems, the Reuters photographer's camera as a threatening weapon. Wikileaks reported that the Apache footage came from government sources, and they pledge in a note on the footage that they're willing to stand up to protect the identity of those people: "Wikileaks exists to help you safely reveal important material to the world. We have an unbroken record in protecting confidential sources. Contact us." Wikileaks founder Julian Assange went on Al Jazeera to testify to the authenticity of the video.

Wikileaks reach, amorphousness, and willingness to protect its sources come what may has raised the ire of some governments; it was recently revealed -- on Wikileaks, naturally -- that the government of Australia had included the clearinghouse on a blacklist of websites that it was considering banning in the country.

News Briefs

RSS Feed thursday >

NYC Open Data Advocates Focus on Quality And Value Over Quantity

The New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications plans to publish more than double the amount of datasets this year than it published to the portal last year, new Commissioner Anne Roest wrote last week in an annual report mandated by the city's open data law, with 135 datasets scheduled to be released this year, and almost 100 more to come in 2015. But as preparations are underway for City Council open data oversight hearings in the fall, what matters more to advocates than the absolute number of the datasets is their quality. GO

Civic Tech and Engagement: Announcing a New Series on What Makes it "Thick"

Announcing a new series of feature articles that we will be publishing over the next several months, thanks to the support of the Rita Allen Foundation. Our focus is on digitally-enabled civic engagement, and in particular, how and under what conditions "thick" digital civic engagement occurs. What we're after is answers to this question: When does a tech tool or platform enable actual people to make ongoing and significant contributions to each other, to a place or cause, at a scale that produces demonstrable change? GO

More