A few minutes ago at 1:42pm, the White House blog announced a live web chat with Labor Secretary Hilda Solis "to discuss the contents of the Department of Labor’s new regulatory agenda, which focuses on improving the lives of working Americans and leveling the playing field for businesses that play by the rules." Questions can be submitted through this live chat window, via Twitter using the hashtag #DOLREGS, by calling 1-866-487-2365 or by emailing webmaster@dol.gov.
There's only one hitch: the chat starts at 2:00pm. That's 18 minutes to engage a public. In fairness, the Department of Labor Regulations home page announced the upcoming chat sometime Friday afternoon, but that announcement didn't exactly get picked up by many observers.
There's one consolation. Solis's chat will be followed by Dec. 7, 8 and 9 (at the same address) by chats hosted by the heads of these Labor Department agencies: the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Office of Labor-Management Standards, the Wage and Hour Division, the Employment and Training Administration, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and the Employee Benefits Security Administration. Details here.
This is an extreme example of a problem that seems to be turning into a pattern. Last week, for example, the White House held a clean energy forum with 120 youth leaders that was also streamed live, but with little warning. Some environmental activists I bumped into last week weren't pleased with how little advance notice they got of the event. Same with the "Ask U.S." forum that was done with Ambassador Scott Gration, NSC's Samantha Power and leaders of the Darfur anti-genocide movement. To be sure, it can be hard to schedule these events far in advance, but 18 minutes notice is pretty ridiculous. Call it "engagement lite."
Comments
You've been had...
@Micah,
You assume that @WhiteHouse wants to engage the general public with these Department of Labor Web chats.
Ask yourself this question: Who on 18 minutes notice is going to join a previously unannounced Web forum on labor issues?
- Small business owners: No
- Non-union workers (the majority of which are working): No
- Labor union organizers: Yes
Only a small fraction of the people directly involved in labor rules can even participate, but on short notice the only stakeholder group who can and will participate are labor groups -- and maybe some friendly liberal/progressive interest groups.
So, there you go. @WhiteHouse gets to claim transparency and openness while ensuring that no interests other than labor unions get a real opportunity to engage in this forum.
Actually
Of the 100+ names, I found ONE who's actually paid by unions, and he was an elected official, thus representing his local. Most of the questions came from industry consultants and those in the education sector. I only checked afew names, and you can feel free to do your own research.
This is an extreme example of
This is an extreme example of a problem that seems to be turning into a pattern. Last week, for example, the White House held a clean energy forum with 120 youth leaders that was also streamed live, but with little warning. Some environmental activists I bumped into last week weren't pleased with how little advance notice they got of the event. Same with the "Ask U.S." forum that was done with Ambassador Scott Gration, NSC's Samantha Power and leaders of the Darfur anti-genocide movement. To be sure, it can be hard to schedule these events far in advance, but 18 minutes notice is pretty ridiculous. Call it "engagement lite."
This beautiful and informative article, thank you very much. Use this page to your friend told you. I am constantly followed. To receive more information about this topic the following internet sites can follow.
Download gratis di programmi
dizi izle,film izle,dizi
dizi izle,film izle,dizi izle,vpills,film izle,film izle,dizi,erotik izle,erotik izle,film izle,v-pills