Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

How Candidates Can Use the Internet to Win in 2010 (Part One)

BY Colin Delany | Tuesday, September 22 2009

Cross-posted from Epolitics.com

Barack Obama won't be on the ballot in November of 2010, but thousands of other candidates will -- and he'll be very much on their minds. His public image will shape the political environment, of course, but plenty of politicians and political professionals on all sides will also look to his ground-breaking online campaign as an inspiration, seeking to replicate his success at using the internet to raise money, find supporters and put people to work in the real world.

But running for state legislature, a congressional seat, a governorship or even the U.S. Senate is different than running for president, and most down-ballot candidates have been reluctant to do much more than dip their toes into the digital waters so far. That's likely to change soon, since despite the vast gap between a national race and one for dog-catcher, many of the same online political rules apply and most of the same technologies are available. Here's why state- and local-level campaigns should pay attention to the potential of internet-based politics:

1. The Internet is (Just About) Everywhere

Regardless of local demographics, the internet can be a factor in almost any election in the U.S. In wealthier urban and suburban areas, most voters will be online and a majority will have broadband access, but even in far-flung rural areas or poorer parts of cities at least email is usually available. Not every segment of U.S. society is well-represented online, but the politically active are much more likely to use the internet for news and information than their tuned-out neighbors. And despite stereotypes, the days of the 'net as a young person's preserve are long gone -- the majority of people 65 and up now check in online.

2. Online Fundraising Works

If the 2008 presidential race taught us anything, it's that the internet is one hell of a cash machine -- Obama's ability to raise as much money as his campaign could reasonably absorb, in part by returning to the small donors who stuck with him again and again through the worst, was decisive. State and local campaigns are getting more expensive every cycle, a trend that will probably accelerate if campaign finance limits dissolve, and candidates at all levels will likely find themselves turning to online donations to keep up.

But online fundraising doesn't happen by magic -- it's usually the result of a concerted strategy to make it happen. Fortunately for us...

3. The Tools and Techniques are Available to (Almost) All

As vendors have developed software suites that scale to campaigns of different sizes, internet-based fundraising and supporter-management packages are now within reach of almost any political operation. Best practices for using them are no secret, either, since plenty of strategy guides supplement the clear example of the Obama campaign itself. The essential tools usually include a website, an email-based Constituent Relations Management system and an online fundraising module, which campaigns can then promote through online social networks, video, blogger outreach, Google Ads and other channels.

4. Targeted Online Outreach + Down-Ballot Candidates = a Perfect Match

Top-level presidential candidates seem to get media attention every time they open their mouths, but the problem for state and local campaigns is often to get noticed at all. In races with limited resources and little press coverage, the inherent ability to target most online outreach at low cost can help stretch a tight budget. In a densely populated urban or suburban area, for instance, where broadcast TV advertising is impractical for many campaigns because too many spots will be wasted on viewers outside district lines, cheap Google and Facebook ads could work alongside targeted cable TV spots to spread messages and help find supporters, donors and volunteers in a defined geographic area.

Blog outreach may also be more of a priority for a local candidate, since state and regional political blogs (and Twitter!) provide convenient watering holes for political activists. Like many other forms of social media outreach, blogging and blogger relations are usually cheap in money but expensive in time, a good match for scrappy campaigns with more enthusiasm than cash. And just about any campaign can also benefit from having a body of clear, topical and targeted content on the web in a variety of outlets, since voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Mr. Google for basic information about local races.

5. You May Not Be Online, But Your Opponents Probably Are

Bringing up Google illustrates why modern campaigns ignore the internet at their peril, because the other side probably isn't following the same script. For instance, if you're a candidate and your opponents AREN'T raising money online, they're at least posting content that criticizes you, which is going unanswered if you're not paying attention. Candidates can't control the online political debate, but they can influence it -- in the world of blogs, YouTube, Google and social forwarding, a robust online presence isn't just an offensive weapon, it's also a powerful defense. The best response to an online attack? An established foundation of good content, plus aggressive outreach and a lot of trusted voices speaking on your behalf.

Begin at the Very Beginning

Okay, we're convinced -- so where do state-and local-level candidates start? Let's look next at the essentials of online political campaigning, including the basic tools and activities involved and the resources needed. After that, we'll talk about using the internet as an outreach and mobilization tool in competent and creative ways, followed by a special chapter on everyone's favorite topic, online fundraising. We'll wrap up the series with a sample campaign online outreach plan, plus some resources for further study. Sounds like a hoot to me -- look for the next installment later this week.

cpd

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

yesterday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

Team Obama Spends Big On Digital

There's more to come from recently filed campaign finance reports from the presidential campaigns. Meantime, Politico notes that Barack Obama's re-election effort has so far spent $2.2 million in online advertising, millions more on payroll and $809,000 on computer equipment and software. GO

tuesday >

Romney Campaign to Test Out Square Tonight

As Nick Bilton noted last night, the Mitt Romney campaign plans to test out Square for fund-raising at a Florida event tonight. A spokeswoman for Barack Obama's re-election campaign told us yesterday that Obama campaign staffers and select volunteers around the country would be getting the devices, which attach to mobile phones and work as credit card readers, as well as custom software that collects the information necessary for donations to be compliant with Federal Election Commission requirements.

Update: Now with screenshots!

GO

How Much Should a Campaign Know About an Online Volunteer?

Rick Santorum's campaign is asking folks to go online and make calls today on the former senator from Pennsylvania's behalf. Earlier this morning I noted that Mitt Romney's team is doing the same.

One ongoing discussion around this type of tool is how much the campaign should know about the volunteer before the volunteer is allowed to, well, volunteer. Mitt Romney's campaign just asks for a name and email address. Santorum's campaign requires volunteers to put in a full address before it starts revealing to users of their click-to-call tool the names and phone numbers of prospective voters. It's an additional step to protect voters' privacy — and to get more data for the campaign — although it isn't difficult for tricksters to use a fake or inaccurate address in a form like this.

GO

More