Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Engaging in Iran: The Contested Election, Twitter, and the Response Inside and Out

BY Nancy Scola | Sunday, June 14 2009

In the last day, the reaction to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's supposed re-election as president of Iran with an alleged 62.9% of the vote has been swelling inside Iran and out. We've seen street protests in Tehran, violence there, and a veritable tsunami of information online detailing the facts, figures, and passions surrounding an election that taps into the very heart of how Iranians view the future of their republic. As we saw in Moldova, the idea of a "Twitter Revolution" isn't always borne out by the facts, at least to the extent that the uprising would have not taken place without the tool. At this historic moment in time, it's fascinating to watch -- and participate in -- how a political conflict can evolve online, how those outside the immediate sphere of its influence have a role in the chain of events, and all that interest and passion can feed back into the cycle of how events play out.

With that, there are a few particular threads, themes, and points of interest worth keeping an eye on when it comes to Iran at the moment:

  • There have been mixed reports that Facebook, YouTube, and cell phone networks were blocked by the Iranian government as protests heated up -- a nod of respect, perhaps, to their power in times of protest, particularly in a country where 60% of the population is under 30. The reformist candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi had been making extensive use of all three tools throughout the course of his campaign, which had made real inroads with Iran's youth and well-off. The mobile networks, reports AFP, are government-owned.
  • Twitter has proven resilient, with apparent occasional periods of outage. Some of the tweeters apparently working from inside Iran include @tehranelection/Abdul-Azim Mohammed and @Change_for_Iran. A hashtag to follow is #iranelection. There's also @mousavi1388, but that doesn't appear to actual be the opposition candidate himself, since the tweet stream reported and then pulled back on the idea that Mousavi had been placed under house arrest.
  • A point of focus of Twitter action coming from outside Iran was the lack of coverage of election events by more mainstream news sources, CNN in particular. #CNNfail built up steam over the course of yesterday. It's an interesting development: a somewhat surprising affirmation of the Daou Triangle idea that new media's leverage point is still quote-unquote old media. Are we seeing an acknowledgement that establishment media is still the go-to source in times like this, due to their resources, influence, and access? Or is the last gasp of a dying way of looking at the media ecosystem?
  • Politico's Ben Smith noted that CNN seemed stuck in a programming rut, with Larry King devoted to an interview with the folks behind "American Chopper." The Twittersphere is enormously nimble, and can change focus in a nano-second. TV, at least, isn't quite so free to operate. Relatedly, where Twitter perhaps falls behind is in terms of scale: there's a bandwagon effect that can make the Motrin Moms episode, for example, the most important topic in the world for a certain time period. But here, the historic import of events in Tehran could arguably be said to match the related Twitter swarm.
  • The Huffington Post's Nico Pitney is engaging in a supremely interesting experiment in tracking dozens of sources about the events in Iran. It's what someone in Pitney's shoes -- both reporter and aggregator -- brings newly to the table.
  • The Obama Administration's response to Ahmadinejad's declaration of victory has been somewhat restrained -- not surprising given the volatility of the U.S. relationship with Iran and the complexity of the political scene there, but particulary striking against his recent outreach to the Middle East and its young people in particular. But could the spirited and passionate response of the world (and American voters) compel a more articulated response from the White House? (Sort of a "Get Iran Right" to match the "Get FISA Right" of the campaign season?)

That's a start. What are you seeing out there? (Photo by .faramarz)

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

yesterday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

Team Obama Spends Big On Digital

There's more to come from recently filed campaign finance reports from the presidential campaigns. Meantime, Politico notes that Barack Obama's re-election effort has so far spent $2.2 million in online advertising, millions more on payroll and $809,000 on computer equipment and software. GO

tuesday >

Romney Campaign to Test Out Square Tonight

As Nick Bilton noted last night, the Mitt Romney campaign plans to test out Square for fund-raising at a Florida event tonight. A spokeswoman for Barack Obama's re-election campaign told us yesterday that Obama campaign staffers and select volunteers around the country would be getting the devices, which attach to mobile phones and work as credit card readers, as well as custom software that collects the information necessary for donations to be compliant with Federal Election Commission requirements.

Update: Now with screenshots!

GO

How Much Should a Campaign Know About an Online Volunteer?

Rick Santorum's campaign is asking folks to go online and make calls today on the former senator from Pennsylvania's behalf. Earlier this morning I noted that Mitt Romney's team is doing the same.

One ongoing discussion around this type of tool is how much the campaign should know about the volunteer before the volunteer is allowed to, well, volunteer. Mitt Romney's campaign just asks for a name and email address. Santorum's campaign requires volunteers to put in a full address before it starts revealing to users of their click-to-call tool the names and phone numbers of prospective voters. It's an additional step to protect voters' privacy — and to get more data for the campaign — although it isn't difficult for tricksters to use a fake or inaccurate address in a form like this.

GO

More