Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Demand Question Time: Can the Internet Change the Old Game of Politics?

BY Micah L. Sifry | Wednesday, February 3 2010

On June 11, 1995, President William Jefferson Clinton and Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich met at the Invitation of the Congress of Claremont Senior Citizens, Inc. to debate issues affecting senior citizens. During the debate, the political foes shook hands and pledged to create a bi-partisan commission to study federal limits on lobbying and the financing of election campaigns. This famous "handshake" on campaign finance reform was carried live on television and received widespread media coverage including front page attention in newspapers nationwide.

That's the wording of a historic plaque that sits outside the Earl Bourdon seniors center in Claremont, New Hampshire on Maple Ave. (Here's the Google Street view of the plaque; ain't technology amazing?!) A few years ago, my wife and I were visiting our kids at summer camp and stayed at a hotel in Claremont (a rambling old country inn with tons of charm whose name can't recall); I went out for a jog and ran past this sign on my way. I had to do a double-take; I actually knew the story of that long-forgotten handshake: Back in the late 90s, I worked for a while on the cause of campaign finance reform and public financing of elections.

Clinton and Gingrich had gone to New Hampshire to take part in a town-hall style meeting; recall that this way a few months after the political earthquake in 1994 that led to the Republicans taking over the House of Representatives. A sports shop owner and local county commissioner named Frank MacConnell Jr. asked them, "After the health care reform failure, the very very large disappointment of the last two years is that the special interest groups are really running the country. Would you be willing to have the same type of commission as a [military] base closure commission to review" the nation's campaign finance laws?

Clinton said, "I would love to have a bipartisan commission on it. I accept." And then Gingrich added, "Let's shake hands right here in front of everybody."

We all know how that story ended. Within days, both Clinton and Gingrich were headlining million-dollar events for their parties, and all talk of a bipartisan effort to reduce the power of special interest money in politics was forgotten. MacConnell passed away a year later, at the age of 61. Still, the people of Claremont thought the event was worth remembering by putting up a plaque at the site of the meeting, and indeed it is.

I bring this story up because today, along with a crosspartisan spectrum of activists, politicos, techies, bloggers and friends, I helped launch a modest effort to upgrade American politics aimed at making last Friday's impromptu and unprecedented appearance of President Obama before the House Republican caucus for an hour of live question-and-answer into a new political tradition that we're calling Question Time. You can read our "open letter" and petition here, and David Corn has a nice backgrounder on how we cobbled this together over the last few days here.

I'm not going to reiterate all the reasons for why I think a regular Question Time would be a "good thing" for American democracy; you can get that from the DemandQuestionTime.com site too.

I just want to say, with that old Clinton-Gingrich handshake in mind, we've been promised better behavior before. From time to time, the American public starts grumbling, and manages to get our elected representatives on the record promising to do better. And then, as soon as they can, they fall back into their old patterns. We've been grumbling a lot more lately, but whether that is going to lead to real changes in how politics works...well, I obviously am an eternal optimist, or maybe it's just that I have "change-the-world" disease.

But I'd like to believe that the Internet is a new factor that may change that old pattern, though I don't have any way to know or prove that. But I'm sure hoping that a few years from now, with all the things that we hackers of politics have been working on--and you know who I'm talking about--I hope we hackers of politics will have a lot more than a historic plaque to show for our efforts.

News Briefs

RSS Feed wednesday >

What Twitter Won't Tell You About the Election

A new study released on Tuesday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press on Tuesday offers the opportunity to get real about what the political conversation on Twitter and Facebook can — or can't — tell you about the progression of the 2012 political campaign. Pew has found that even among users of Twitter and Facebook, a paltry percentage of people use social networks to get news about politics: Only 24 percent of Twitter users in the sample and 25 percent of Facebook users said they "sometimes" got campaign news through that network, while a full 40 percent of Twitter users in the sample and 46 percent of other social media users reported "never" getting campaign news through either Twitter or Facebook. GO

Navigating New York's "Road Map for the Digital City," One Year In

In May 2011, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg revealed a "Road Map for the Digital City," a plan to use technology to make city government more and participatory, and to leverage the city's tech sector for economic and civic gains.

New York City Chief Digital Officer Rachel Sterne will join our editorial director, Micah Sifry, on a conference call this Friday afternoon to discuss the progress on that road map so far. The call is free and open to anyone to join. You can sign up here.

GO

yesterday >

Pete Hoekstra's Campaign Website's "Offensive" Source Code Changed After Outcry

As if "chop suey fonts" and obvious graphic allusions to the stereotype of the Chinese as the Yellow Peril weren't controversial enough, the group that created an incendiary microsite for former Rep. Pete Hoekstra's campaign has managed to further fan the flames with what it's calling a mistake in its code. GO

Fidel Castro Loves the Internet

“The Internet is a revolutionary instrument that permits the receiving and transmission of ideas, in both directions, that is something we should know how to use,” Fidel Castro told a crowd of supporters on Feb. 4, according to the state-owned Cuban newspaper Granma International. Castro, who made his first public appearance since April 2011, launched his two-volume memoir, “Guerilla of Time,” and took the opportunity to discuss issues of importance to him. Earlier this week, Miranda Neubauer reported that one of these topics was the need for the Internet. Castro has been a proponent of the Internet as a tool for the exchange of ideas since 2003, but the average Cuban citizen faces great difficulty getting online. GO

Claire McCaskill Hires Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner As Digital Director

Missouri's senior Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill has hired Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner as its digital director. GO

Controversial Hoekstra Microsite Targeting Debbie Stabenow Created By The Prosper Group

Michigan Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra has caused a firestorm in the past 24 hours with a new campaign ad that depicts China as a young woman riding a bike in a rural area speaking in broken English. The thirty second spot aired in Michigan during the Super Bowl on Sunday, and it accuses Democratic incumbent Debbie Stabenow of aiding ... GO

White House CTO Aneesh Chopra's Exit Interview

On his way out of the White House and back to Virginia, where he is expected to run for public office — but will neither confirm or deny that's the plan — Aneesh Chopra describes the shape of the post he pioneered as the country's first-ever chief technology officer.

As a result of Chopra's interview with The Atlantic's tech/politics correspondent, Nancy Scola, there's now a public record of what this first-ever CTO thinks the CTO's job actually is ("On any topic that is a priority for the president, my role is evaluate how technology, data, and innovation can advance, support, and improve upon those strategies," among other things) and how it might be improved.

GO

friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

More