Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

In Defense of "YouCut"

BY Nancy Scola | Thursday, May 13 2010

Knocks against House minority whip Eric Cantor's (R-VA) new YouCut tool for crowdscourcing budgeting decisions essentially write themselves. But dig beneath the surface, argues Cantor's new media director Matt Lira, and there might be more there there.

(A primer on YouCut: the public votes on which of five government programs they'd like to see cut, and House GOP leadership pledges to take the winner to the floor for an up or down vote.)

First, the knocks. With an annual federal budget in the $3 billion and a federal deficit pushing the $13 trillion mark, slicing $52 million a year in Presidential Election Fund spending is like picking the basil off of a plate of four-cheese gnocchi and proclaiming yourself on a diet, as Media Matters has noted. Republican, in recent years, have been profligate public spenders, as Speaker Pelosi's office has encapsulated in chart form. What's more, as has been pointed out on RedState and by techPres contributor Colin Delany, asking people to vote via the web or mobile text message for which of the spending cuts already targeted by House Republicans to push on the House floor smacks of convenient gimmickry by a party that hasn't always embraced grassroots engagement and is being challenged by its right, Tea Party, flank. All the GOP is after, goes one critique, is forcing Democrats to have to make bad votes.

And yet. And yet. (Prepare your spitballs now.) Is it so easy to dismiss YouCut both as an experiment in opening up government and as a savvy, modern approach to shaping the political environment?

Cantor's new media director Matt Lira sees YouCut as, more or less, a two pronged online tactic. The first prong is using technology to crack open policy making, something that has a wide fan base these days, including the guy in the White House. "There such a temptation to view things through a partisan lens," said Lira, an RNC veteran who trained under Patrick Ruffini at the RNC. We spoke last night. "We owe it to ourselves to take a step back and say 'What does this mean in terms of the relationship between the public and the legislature at a tactical level?'" Lira went on. "There's a disconnect between people and representatives on both sides of the aisle, and this technology has the potential to heal that wound. That's not to say that this is the Holy Grail. But I do think it's a meaningful step forward. This is a way for us to demonstrate not only what our priorities are, but that the priorities of the public are, and it's about opening the doors to the legislature itself."

YouCut, at least, has proven itself popular. The accompanying hashtag has been lighting up Twitter. Says Lira, "The traffic to the Whip's website is higher today than its ever been under any Whip. It's higher, even, than the traffic during the health care debate." The Washington Post's Dave Weigel reports that as of last night, "7,000 activists had already cast YouCut votes."

Prong two is best thought of, perhaps, as a culture shift. Republican and Democratic caucuses aren't monoliths, as tempting as it might be something to see them that way. "Tribes" is perhaps a more useful frame. In his third year as Whip, Cantor, says Lira, is aiming to advance an agenda under his Economic Recovery Working Group (ERWG), and using technology to do it. Parliamentary procedure gives the minority party in the House a chance to force votes on occasion. YouCut winners will, each week, be offered on the floor of the House for up or down votes. Selling the idea of cutting government spending inside the GOP caucus is clearly an aim. Whether or not you believe there's a true political commitment to budget cutting in Cantor-world doesn't necessarily impact the political utility of putting a meme like "YouCut" out into the world.

"If you begin to focus on cutting, then it drives a culture around you that then leads to bigger things. Says the Denver native, "I'm almost astounded by the view that this is just a million dollars being wasted in a year. At what point do you stop putting drops in the bucket?" Cantor, who looks like the cross between an accountant and a programmer, has found a good amount of buy-in amongst some in his caucus. Texas Rep. Jeb Hensarling drew press for YouCut in his local Dallas Morning News, with a spokesperson quoted as saying, "the debt and deficit are symptoms, spending is the disease. Members of his ERWG have been actively tweeting about it.

So have Democrats, chief among them Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer, the force behind the #GOPYouSerious? hashtag -- as in "Republicans had 12 yrs to address fiscal responsibility. They chose not to. No gimmick can erase their irresponsible record. #GOPYouSerious?"

On a strategic level, it's worth remembering that slashing government programs needn't be a big cut to shape a party's image as defender taxpayer dollars. The Republican Revolution of 1994 excised funding for the Office of Technology Assessment. The message there was the this new GOP was willing to cut close to the bone, even in their own institution. Then again, people have been lamenting the loss of the OTA ever since.

Lira says that the plan is to run YouCut every week until the end of the year.


Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.


wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.


The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.


tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.


Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.


monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.