With Data Ascendant, Figuring Out Who Counts
BY Nancy Scola | Tuesday, February 24 2009
"Yadda yadda data yadda yadda transparency yadda yadda online" is how I'm guessing a lot of conversations go in DC today. Case in point: this New York Times* op-ed from former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein. Duberstein is arguing that the true state of our modern and almost mind-boggling complex union can't be captured in one evening's speech, even by the most eloquent of orators.
Instead, we should be thinking about compiling and disseminating data on every indicator of our nation's health -- from, well, health to education to jobs to energy use. And it should happen, suggests Duberstein, under the direction of the National Academy of Sciences.
There's undoubtedly rich caches of government (and taxpayer paid-for) going to waste. Duberstein's NAS suggestion strikes me, though, as a bit funny. You know the old bit about "lies, damn lies, and statistics"? Deciding how to count things carries power (see, Census, U.S.). As the importance of data grows in DC, as it seems to be, it seems unlikely that anyone in government is going to be eager to let someone else do the counting for them.
Corrected. I originally had it as the Washington Post.