Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Coakley vs Brown Online: Tracking the MA Senate Special Election

BY Micah L. Sifry | Friday, January 15 2010

Next Tuesday's special election in Massachusetts to fill the remaining three years of Ted Kennedy's term in the U.S. Senate is drawing a lot of attention, not only as the latest test of the national political winds, but also because if Republican Scott Brown defeats Democrat Martha Coakley, the Democrats will be down to 59 votes in the Senate (counting the two independents) and the health care bill may die on the vine. Both national parties are pouring money and troops into the state and the polls suggest it could be a close race. With that in mind, I thought it would be interesting to see what the online metrics might tell us about next Tuesday's vote. And on the face of it, Brown is surging.

On Facebook, Coakley has 10,454 fans at the moment, vs 49,086 for Brown. That's quite a lead for Brown and shows he's definitely caught the awareness of the right-roots.

On YouTube, both candidates have active pages. Brown has had about 340,000 views in all of his videos, and the top one, a response ad to an ad from Coakley attacking him, has gotten nearly 90,000 views in four days. Coakley has had just over 38,000 views of her videos, not nearly 1/10 Brown's total, though her most popular video, "Lockstep Republican," has gotten 20,000 in the three days since it's been up. (It's worth noting that her top viewed video has a pretty low average rating of 1.8 vs Brown's 4.5--a hint that of where online energy resides.)

On Twitter, Coakley has 2,795 followers vs Brown's 7,815. Here's how conversation about the two candidates stacks up on Trendistic for the last 30 days (#masen is the generic tag):

Blogpulse shows rising mentions of both candidates in the blogosphere, with references to Brown trending higher:

Here's Compete.com's tracking of monthly visits to the Coakley and Brown websites. It looks close, but keep in mind that Compete's data is monthly and we don't have the January data yet:

From these metrics, one could conclude that Coakley is running a much weaker campaign online, and that online activists are much more excited about Brown. But over on ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising hub, there are several efforts gathering small donations for Coakley, and nearly 10,000 people have donated more than $850,000 to her campaign through the site. I'd share Republican online fundraising numbers if there were any to share.

A key question about all these numbers is how much translates into interest and activity on the ground in-state. It's difficult to use the internet to get at that question, but here's one harbinger: organic search on Google from people in Massachusetts appears to favor Brown over Coakley. (See below.) Is it voters checking out the newcomer, or getting comfortable with their decision to support him? We'll know a lot more on Tuesday.

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

yesterday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

Team Obama Spends Big On Digital

There's more to come from recently filed campaign finance reports from the presidential campaigns. Meantime, Politico notes that Barack Obama's re-election effort has so far spent $2.2 million in online advertising, millions more on payroll and $809,000 on computer equipment and software. GO

tuesday >

Romney Campaign to Test Out Square Tonight

As Nick Bilton noted last night, the Mitt Romney campaign plans to test out Square for fund-raising at a Florida event tonight. A spokeswoman for Barack Obama's re-election campaign told us yesterday that Obama campaign staffers and select volunteers around the country would be getting the devices, which attach to mobile phones and work as credit card readers, as well as custom software that collects the information necessary for donations to be compliant with Federal Election Commission requirements.

Update: Now with screenshots!

GO

How Much Should a Campaign Know About an Online Volunteer?

Rick Santorum's campaign is asking folks to go online and make calls today on the former senator from Pennsylvania's behalf. Earlier this morning I noted that Mitt Romney's team is doing the same.

One ongoing discussion around this type of tool is how much the campaign should know about the volunteer before the volunteer is allowed to, well, volunteer. Mitt Romney's campaign just asks for a name and email address. Santorum's campaign requires volunteers to put in a full address before it starts revealing to users of their click-to-call tool the names and phone numbers of prospective voters. It's an additional step to protect voters' privacy — and to get more data for the campaign — although it isn't difficult for tricksters to use a fake or inaccurate address in a form like this.

GO

More