Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Carl Malamud Takes the Long View

BY Nancy Scola | Tuesday, September 7 2010

Photo credit: James Duncan Davidson

Carl Malamud isn't particularly worried if open government, of the tech-enabled sort that has been the topic of some discussion in recent years, hasn't yet set the wide world afire. "In matters of style, swim with the current," said Malamud this morning in his speech at the Gov 2.0 Summit this morning, quoting that American philosopher Thomas Jefferson. "In matters of principle stand like a rock."

When Malamud gave, to a standing ovation, a speech at last year's inaugural Gov 2.0 conference in DC, an address that he called "By the People," he layed out a vision for how the publishing of data and the opening up of government systems might transform the relationship between the people of the United States and the government that's meant, by design, to serve them. But, he followed up this morning, he never said it was going to be easy. Or much of a party.

That said, only the most short-sighted amongst us doesn't recognize that American history is full of stories about how a few, lonely, rock-like people toiling both inside and outside government can, if they work hard and hold on for a while, have transformative effect. To wit: in the late 1880s, a USDA chemist named Harvey Wiley has amongst those investigating the rather sordid state of food safety in America. Add an agitator -- in the form of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle -- and perhaps some enlightened bureaucrats, and, said Malamud, you get the Food and Drug Act of 1906. The lesson, perhaps, is that if it's naive to believe that such change is possible in the United States, than it's at least as ignorantly cynical to believe that it's not.

So, the road will be a long-one. Malamud has a three part vision for what it will look like. The first, he says, is to "finish the open gov revolution," but getting more existing government data online and accessible.

The second taps into a Malamud favorite tactic: scanning. "If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can launch the Library of Congress into cyberspace," he said, and he wants considerable resources backing up such a commitment. Malamud argued that the U.S. should be spending at least a quarter of billion dollars each year for the next decade on a national scanning initiative.

And the third step, argued Malamud, is an "open systems revolution." Here, Malamud's historical example is one Estes Kefauver, the mid-20th century Democratic Senator from Tennessee. In the wake of the Thalidomide disaster, Kefauver went after the capture of the FDA by the pharmaceutical industry. Employing a bit of programmer lingo, Malamud said that Kefauver "flipped the bit so drugs had to be proved safe instead of proved unsafe." Or, to put it in terms more familiar, perhaps, Kefauver managed to get passed his Drug Efficacy Amendment in 1962 that changed the presumption that said that government would let drugs go to market unless it had an appalling reason not to do so.

The analogous bit-flipping for the 21st century, detailed Malamud, was creating a presumption that government uses open-source software systems. Malamud had some harsh word for government tech contractors selling the government proprietary products. "The President should call in the federal tech staff and tell them what Lyndon Johnson told the FDA regulators," he said, "when he got in their face and said 'let the venal and the self-seeking and the tawdry and the tainted fear to enter your building.'"

Wrapping up, Malamud offered attendees a vision for a promised land, a time when open government is, indeed, a party, or at least conventional wisdom on the American landscape. "If we believe we can make government more efficient, more effective, more just, we must practice our craft until we can swim with the currents of our time," guided Malamud, "for if we remain anchored to the deepest rock of principle, then we will see 'justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.'" That's the Bible, Amos 5, I believe.

The full text of Malamud's speech is here.

News Briefs

RSS Feed friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

yesterday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

Team Obama Spends Big On Digital

There's more to come from recently filed campaign finance reports from the presidential campaigns. Meantime, Politico notes that Barack Obama's re-election effort has so far spent $2.2 million in online advertising, millions more on payroll and $809,000 on computer equipment and software. GO

tuesday >

Romney Campaign to Test Out Square Tonight

As Nick Bilton noted last night, the Mitt Romney campaign plans to test out Square for fund-raising at a Florida event tonight. A spokeswoman for Barack Obama's re-election campaign told us yesterday that Obama campaign staffers and select volunteers around the country would be getting the devices, which attach to mobile phones and work as credit card readers, as well as custom software that collects the information necessary for donations to be compliant with Federal Election Commission requirements.

Update: Now with screenshots!

GO

How Much Should a Campaign Know About an Online Volunteer?

Rick Santorum's campaign is asking folks to go online and make calls today on the former senator from Pennsylvania's behalf. Earlier this morning I noted that Mitt Romney's team is doing the same.

One ongoing discussion around this type of tool is how much the campaign should know about the volunteer before the volunteer is allowed to, well, volunteer. Mitt Romney's campaign just asks for a name and email address. Santorum's campaign requires volunteers to put in a full address before it starts revealing to users of their click-to-call tool the names and phone numbers of prospective voters. It's an additional step to protect voters' privacy — and to get more data for the campaign — although it isn't difficult for tricksters to use a fake or inaccurate address in a form like this.

GO

More