Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

CORRECTED: From the Bloomberg Campaign, Some Social Media Stats

BY Nick Judd | Monday, February 8 2010

Bloomberg 2009 online strategist Jonah Seiger spoke at an event last week that we co-sponsored with ClickZ, the website that covers online advertising, at which Andrew Rasiej and ClickZ reporter — and former Personal Democracy Forum staffer — Kate Kaye shared moderating duties.

We've just uploaded the video to YouTube, which is embedded above.

Mike Bloomberg's 2009 mayoral campaign was a bit of a unique case in that he had nearly unlimited resources and no desire to use new media to raise money. That presented a challenge because small donations also nearly guarantee the donor's vote, Seiger said — because the donor has just invested in the candidate — but, obviously, the availability of resources from day one couldn't have hurt. For Seiger, it wasn't the first time facing this situation: he and his firm, Connections Media, also worked on Bloomberg's 2005 re-election campaign.

That said, Seiger's presentation — on how Bloomberg made use of online tools — yielded some interesting stats. During the talk, Seiger broke down how the Bloomberg campaign tried to figure out the universe of voters they could reach on social media. The end result, somehow, is that the campaign reached about 37,000 voters through social media — probably. NYConvergence's Amy Berryhill filed a report on the event that points out Seiger used "a lot of assumptions, but pretty straightforward math."

Here's a little more detail — statistics from the talk:

Total Bloomberg Facebook supporters and Twitter followers, combined: 40,000
Unique visitors to bloomberg2009.com from inside New York City: 500,000
Followers of @mikebloomberg's followers on Twitter: 31 million
Those accounts with New York City listed as a profile location: 3.5 million
The number of actual people in the New York City social media sphere, based on analysis of Facebook and Twitter: +/- 3 million
Total online ad impressions bought by the campaign: 1.1 billion

This universe only includes people who are, age-wise, eligible to vote, Seiger said. Seiger figures the campaign reached 10 percent of that universe — about 300,000 people — on election day. Multiply that by the voter turnout level — about 56 24 percent, Seiger says — then again by the percentage of voters who voted for Bloomberg — 51 percent — and the campaign figures it reached 36,720 voters.

The Bloomberg campaign made use of hashtags to get tweets into relevant conversations, and tried to make use of that 31-million-large potential social network in a "tweet out the vote" campaign.

There was a lot of detail in the talk on how the Bloomberg campaign used geotargeting and social media best practices (talking with followers, for example — especially influential ones) to build communities of Bloomberg supporters around locations and interests. Check out the video for the entire thing.

CORRECTED: This post has been updated to note that Seiger estimates the Bloomberg campaign reached 36,720 voters online on election day based on the following computation: A reach of about 10 percent of New York City's total social media audience (300,000) x the level of voter turnout (.24) x the proportion of voters who voted for Bloomberg (about .51). The original post misstated Seiger's math.

News Briefs

RSS Feed yesterday >

Claire McCaskill Hires Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner As Digital Director

Missouri's senior Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill has hired Blue State Digital's Alex Kellner as its digital director. GO

Controversial Hoekstra Microsite Targeting Debbie Stabenow Created By The Prosper Group

Michigan Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra has caused a firestorm in the past 24 hours with a new campaign ad that depicts China as a young woman riding a bike in a rural area speaking in broken English. The thirty second spot aired in Michigan during the Super Bowl on Sunday, and it accuses Democratic incumbent Debbie Stabenow of aiding ... GO

White House CTO Aneesh Chopra's Exit Interview

On his way out of the White House and back to Virginia, where he is expected to run for public office — but will neither confirm or deny that's the plan — Aneesh Chopra describes the shape of the post he pioneered as the country's first-ever chief technology officer.

As a result of Chopra's interview with The Atlantic's tech/politics correspondent, Nancy Scola, there's now a public record of what this first-ever CTO thinks the CTO's job actually is ("On any topic that is a priority for the president, my role is evaluate how technology, data, and innovation can advance, support, and improve upon those strategies," among other things) and how it might be improved.

GO

friday >

Slovenian ambassador apologizes for signing ACTA, Poland halts ratification

Apparently, some EU countries are reconsidering their support to ACTA, only a week after signing the agreement.
Helena Drnovsek Zorko, Slovenia's ambassador to Japan, has in fact issued a public apology to her country for signing it. Meanwhile, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk says he's halting the ratification process of the international treaty.
Last week people took the streets in Poland, and a protest is planned in Ljubljana tomorrow. GO

thursday >

Did Newt Gingrich Lose Florida for Want of a Better API?

Slate's Sasha Issenberg has a great story outlining one narrative about Newt Gingrich's loss in Florida: He inspired a group of tech-savvy volunteers, but gave them no way to plug in to the campaign. GO

House GOP Hosts Legislative Data and Transparency Conference

Today, House Republicans are hosting a conference on legislative data and transparency. The goal, as it's been explained to me, is to set the table for a conversation between House leadership and open government/open data advocates about what the House could or should do next.

More information on the conference is here. It's being live streamed.

GO

When House Republicans Aren't Winning With Transparency

House Republicans have been pushing the results of their transparency initiatives, such as a pilot project to archive video of some committee hearings.

But other committee hearings are apparently off-limits. Politico reports today that documentary filmmaker Josh Fox was arrested while attempting to videotape a House Science Committee hearing on hydrofracking. Only credentialed members of the Congressional press corps can film hearings of that committee.

The archived webcast of that hearing, which was streamed live, is here, if you can get the software to work. Each committee chair has discretion over what to do with video of their hearings, although there's also an office of in-House broadcasters who keep archival footage of everything, staffers have told me previously. As a result, there's no universal standard for how hearings are streamed or archived. The Science Committee uses a content delivery platform powered by Akamai.

GO

Komen's Planned Parenthood Decision Raising Eyebrows Online

Online campaigns have begun to organize in response to news that the breast cancer group Susan G. Komen for the Cure would be cutting its financing to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and education programs. According to the news reports, Komen says the decision is not in response to pressure from anti-abortion groups, as Planned Parenthood alleges. Rather, a spokesperson told the A.P., the main factor is a new rule adopted by Komen that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities. Currently, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) is looking in to how Planned Parenthood spends and reports its money. "Susan D. Komen" has been trending on Google since yesterday. GO

More