Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Barack Obama Gains 37,000+ Followers Since Friday's #Compromise Dip; Big Whoop

BY Micah L. Sifry | Monday, August 1 2011

It was big "news" on Friday in social media circles: "Obama Loses 36,000+ Followers in #Compromise Campaign," Mashable headlined it. Fox News, The Daily News, The New York Post and plenty of other media outlets repeated the story, all repeating the claim that a one-third of one-percent drop in Obama's 9.4 million Twitter following was a big deal.

So, how about a headline for today: Obama is up 37,000 followers on Twitter since that dip on Friday. Surely this must mean something, but what, oh-great-social-media-gurus?

The truth is, neither the dip nor the rise in Obama's daily Twitter count should be taken as meaning much of anything. Like most Twitter celebrities, the @barackobama account is a hollow signifier. Millions of people sign up for the service, note a few familiar names (many of whom are promoted via Twitter's suggested user list), and then rarely use the service again. If someone has millions of "followers" it doesn't mean that all of those people are truly a) paying attention or b) in love with the person they chose to follow. A one-day dip of one-third of one-percent is about as meaningful as a one-day rise.

Had Obama continued to lose followers on Twitter, that might well be an important sign. I suppose that could still occur over the next few days and weeks as the debt ceiling deal plays out. But the flurry of stories about his supposed Twitter #fail this weekend were just one more example of how the political media still mostly fails to report on online politics with any degree of nuance or understanding. (And don't get me started on The Daily Caller's idiotic attack on The New York Times' Jen Preston for asking the White House what #hashtag it was using. Preston's recap here is well worth a read.)

In terms of Obama's ability to actually use Twitter to mobilize supporters and coordinate messaging, it makes sense to pay attention not just to his titular account, but to the dozens of state and local accounts run by Organizing for America staff. A quick spot check, including a look at accounts for the states of California, New York and Florida, showed no dip in support at all. These accounts, which tend to run in the mid-four-figures, are where Obama's real base of activists (plus opposition researchers) is likely to be found, since you really have to be a true politics junkie or hack to follow OFA locally. So far, none of the Republican candidates have anything close to OFA's online infrastructure in the states.

News Briefs

RSS Feed tuesday >

First POST: Company

The global "Snowden effect" is huge; how many consumer-facing online services fail the user privacy test; the Dems' 2016 digital to-do list; and much, much more. GO

monday >

First POST: Mood Slime

The Sony email leak reveals the MPAA's campaign against Google; how Uber is lobbying in local markets; mapping the #MillionsMarchNYC; and much, much more. GO

friday >

First POST: Cloudy

What the Internet is not; new analysis of public opinion on net neutrality; how cloud backup apparently foiled a police coverup; and much, much more. GO

thursday >

First POST: Records

Is the future of citizen journalism vigilantism?; one tech mogul's vocal support for CIA torture; a cri de couer from the founder of the Pirate Bay; and much, much more. GO

Web Index Sees Impact of Net Neutrality, Surveillance and Copyright Laws

Denmark, Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have come out on top of the Web Index, a ranking of the Web Foundation measuring the economic, social and political benefit that countries gain from the web. The United States is at number six. For the authors of the report accompanying the index, the results reflect how inequality has an impact on access to the web. "Nordic policy-makers have been quick to adopt and promote the free Internet - and open access to information - as a 21st century public good," the report states. " Others, as this year's findings show, need to move fast to catch up." The report attributes the Scandinavian countries' advantage to the countries' broader efforts to invest in public goods and establish a welfare and acting against " excess concentrations of wealth and power." With the lower inequality in those countries than in others, "the skills, means and freedoms to benefit from new technologies are widespread, which helps to explain why Scandinavian countries score highly on the political, social and economic impact of the Web GO

More