Personal Democracy Plus Our premium content network. LEARN MORE You are not logged in. LOG IN NOW >

Anti-Obama Filmmaker Alex Jones Cries YouTube Censorship

BY Nancy Scola | Thursday, July 22 2010

Ben Smith reports that the removal of a provocative Sarah Palin post on the building of a mosque and Muslim community center near the former World Trade Center site has Facebook reviewing how content gets removed from the site, either through an "automated system" or the result of user complaints. In the post, since reinstated, Palin calls building the center so close to the site of the 9/11 attack "a tragic mistake."

Getting somewhat less press attention but a noteworthy amount of online interest this week: a complaint by radio host Alex Jones, a self-described leading figure in the 9/11 Truth Movement, that YouTube has been blocking access to his posted videos, some of which have accumulated a considerable number of views; "The Obama Deception," a two-hour film making the case that President Obama is window dressing for "an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery," has gotten more than 6.6. million views. Down for a time, Jones' video is once again available on YouTube.

When asked, Victoria Grand, a spokesperson for YouTube, described for me how the site's content is monitored and managed. "We have an innovative community policing system using a flagging system," said Grand, "where members of the community flag videos that they believe violate the YouTube community guidelines and bring them to the YouTube team's attention for review."

Those YouTube community guidelines are heavy on the community aspect. "We're not asking for the kind of respect reserved for nuns, the elderly, and brain surgeons. We mean don't abuse the site," reads the site. "Every cool new community feature on YouTube involves a certain level of trust. We trust you to be responsible, and millions of users respect that trust. Please be one of them." YouTube asks users to flag content if it falls runs afoul of the community standards in certain areas, spelled out by the company, which include "shocking and disgusting" content and hate speech.

A single "flag" by a user is enough to kick the video over to a human reviewer. From there, "if the YouTube team determines that the video does violate the guidelines, the video is removed. If it doesn't," YouTube's Grand said, "the video remains on YouTube." Content creators whose videos are removed are notified by the company. YouTube company policy is to refuse to comment on particular videos. There's no evidence at hand that the company pulled down Jones' material in this case.

(A New York Times story earlier this week described the effort it takes to monitor the 24 hours worth of video that floods onto the site every minute. Because of the nature of their work, YouTube's human reviewers "are given only yearlong contracts and access to counseling services.")

Jones' YouTube complaint is part of his on-going, multi-layered engagement against Google and YouTube. He recently called on radio listeners to drive up search terms including "Google spies" and "Google launches cover up" that lead to his online properties, including a site called Infowars.com (the tagline of which is, fittingly, "Because There's a War on for Your Mind"). Jones has also attempted to game Google by titling posts on his campaign with references to "Top Secret America," a Washington Post investigative series that has been getting its own share of online attention this week. The desired result, Jones has said, is that "a snowball effect ensues and millions of people all over the world are more likely to be directed toward the story." A request for comment was made through Jones' advertising email address, but wasn't immediately answered.

Complaints about Google's power as an information platform, and its connections to the Obama administration, seem to be on the rise. Consumer Watchdog, you might remember, has been hitting Google hard on related grounds. And the New York Times editorial board recently raised the specter of "search neutrality," taking issue with Google's unrestricted ability to shape who ranks where in the company's search results.

Transparency and Public Shaming: Pakistan Tackles Tax Evasion

In Pakistan, where only one in 200 citizens files their income tax return, authorities published a directory of taxpayers' details for the first time. Officials explained the decision as an attempt to shame defaulters into paying up.

GO

wednesday >

Facebook Seeks Approval as Financial Service in Ireland. Is the Developing World Next?

On April 13 the Financial Times reported that Facebook is only weeks away from being approved as a financial service in Ireland. Is this foray into e-money motivated by Facebook's desire to conquer the developing world before other corporate Internet giants do? Maybe.

GO

The Rise and Fall of Iran's “Blogestan”

The robust community of Iranian bloggers—sometimes nicknamed “Blogestan”—has shrunk since its heyday between 2002 – 2010. “Whither Blogestan,” a recent report from the University of Pennsylvania's Iran Media Program sought to find out how and why. The researchers performed a web crawling analysis of Blogestan, survey 165 Persian blog users, and conducted 20 interviews with influential bloggers in the Persian community. They found multiple causes of the decline in blogging, including increased social media use and interference from authorities.

GO

tuesday >

Weekly Readings: What the Govt Wants to Know

A roundup of interesting reads and stories from around the web. GO

Russia to Treat Bloggers Like Mass Media Because "the F*cking Journalists Won't Stop Writing"

The worldwide debate over who is and who isn't a journalist has raged since digital media made it much easier for citizen journalists and other “amateurs” to compete with the big guys. In the United States, journalists are entitled to certain protections under the law, such as the right to confidential sources. As such, many argue that blogging should qualify as journalism because independent writers deserve the same legal protections as corporate employees. In Russia, however, earning a place equal to mass media means additional regulations and obligations, which some say will lead to the repression of free speech.

GO

Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU

Today the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU) launched a campaign called Politics for People that asks candidates for the European Parliament to pledge to stand up to secretive industry lobbyists and to advocate for transparency. The Politics for People website connects voters with information about their MEP candidates and encourages them to reach out on Facebook, Twitter or by email to ask them to sign the pledge.

GO

monday >

Security Agencies Given Full Access to Telecom Data Even Though "All Lebanese Can Not Be Suspects"

In late March, Lebanese government ministers granted security agencies unrestricted access to telecommunications data in spite of some ministers objections that it violates privacy rights. Global Voices reports that the policy violates Lebanon's existing surveillance and privacy law, Law 140, but has gotten little coverage from the country's mainstream media.

GO

More