Call it Orszag chic: Rick Snyder, a Republican candidate for governor in Michigan, ran an ad spot during the Super Bowl that touted his bona fides as "one tough nerd," though one of his achievements is distinctly more geeky than nerdy in the details, and that's his tenure as the Chief Operating Officer at Gateway, a.k.a. the computers with the cow spots on the box.
No matter. Being a geek and/or nerd in politics has sometimes earned politicians the label of technocrat -- and it's not always used in an endearing way, particularly in contrast to leaders who offer grander visions about how the world should change. But perhaps its a sign of our data-lovin' times, where the President is cheered for battling to hang onto his BlackBerry, that Synder views his nerd cred as an asset in the beleaguered state of Michigan.
Evidence in favor of the idea of that Synder is, in fact, a detail-obsessed nerd? His campaign website at RickForMichigan.com adds footnotes to his Super Bowl ad.
Credit: C-SPANThe White House seems to be gearing up to kill three birds with one stone.
During a pre-Super Bowl interview, President Obama announced that he's invited Republicans to a half-day summit on February 25th that will give them an opportunity to present their proposals for fixing health care. The GOP has complained that Obama hasn't yet heard out their contributions to the health care debate -- bird one. Bird two is that the GOP isn't in much of a position to turn down the session, but it may well be a repeat performance of Obama's "question time" with the House Republican Caucus from earlier this month where Obama grasped much of the limelight, a fair amount of praise, and a bit of breathing room for his health care push.
As for bird three? Well, you'll remember that many on the right and left have criticized Obama from backtracking on his campaign pledge to hold health care negotiations live on C-SPAN. It's become a favorite cudgel for Republicans to use against Obama's push for health care reform. The summit later this month is a chance to combat that line of critique, at least just a little.
I asked C-SPAN communications director Howard Mortman if the network planned on airing the proposed White House health care summit. Short answer: heck yes. Slightly longer answer: "C-SPAN will carry it live and replay it...completely at night," said Mortman, continuing, "plus archive the event through the C-SPAN Video Library."
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the official campaign arm of Senate Democrats, is having some fun at Sarah Palin's expense by inviting people to create visual mockups of her comments at the recent National Tea Party Convention in Nashville. "Tell us what you think Sarah Palin is saying using our new whiteboard tool. Feel free to draw, add text, and decorate the scene however you'd like," reads the DSCC site, built on a tool called ScribLink. The DSCC is saying that they'll be selecting some of the "best" images to post on their website. Yep, you'd better believe that the artwork people send in is -- if any of it is actually going to see the light of day -- going to be filtered first.
In other DSCC news, they're also running a petition asking Carly Fiorina's campaign to create more web video, on account of the demon sheep episode.
My trip to Gov 2.0 Camp LA commenced with a comedy of errors: lost luggage, a flooded hotel room and flooded streets due to the rains. After a night of little sleep, I arrived at the BlankSpaces co-working location to the company of like-minded people from diverse professional backgrounds but all joining the search for using technology and innovation to improve government. In camp style, we each used the 3 word model to describe why we were there. I thought the focus really centered around engaging new paradigms since people from government, major corporations, start-ups, film industry and media were all together to learn and share ideas.
While there was no shortage of technical expertise present, most of the concepts discussed spoke to a high level of education and interest in the Gov 2.0 space, with sessions ranging from how to properly define gov 2.0 to specific tactics to use in social media within government. The biggest takeaways from the event: focus on people, build replicable solutions, and engage in expansive, multi-pronged outreach and public awareness campaigns.
For the hundreds, nay, dare I say thousands of you planning to come out tomorrow to the Atlantic's "State of the Union for Technology" event featuring, among others, yours truly, we just got word that it's be cancelled, in light of the fact that DC is frozen solid. The good folks at the Atlantic are working on rescheduling the event, and you'll certainly be notified as to when.
Game designers were called to the White House's Truman Room last week to brainstorm. What the White House wants to know is what experts in the field of gaming interaction know that can be used to combat one of the United States' toughest foes: childhood obesity.
The target of the White House gaming project is young Americans in those critical "tween" years of 9 to 12, when many of us develop our eating habits for life. (Here's the attendee list for last week's White House session on gaming, led by U.S. CTO Aneesh Chopra.)
Games and government aren't perfect strangers. The USDA, for example, has even experimented with nutrition-based games before; witness "MyPyramid Blast Off," aimed at a slightly younger set. But there's a growing interest both inside and outside government about how richly immersive and expertly crafted gaming experiences can help shape their players' ways of thinking about the world, whether that's the U.S. military's "America's Army" virtual war environment to MTV's choose-your-own-adventure-style "Darfur is Dying" online game to the massively collaborative "World Without Oil" experience.
Chopra is particularly interested in figuring how if small government-funded prizes might encourage game designers to build effective anti-obesity gaming experiences that young people will actually want to play. More here.
"Open" Pages by Agency:
Saturday was the deadline for federal agencies to get web pages up and running at [agency].gov/open, as per the President's orders in his Open Government Directive issued 60 days previous. And despite the snowpocalypsemageddon and DC's own special way of dealing with weather (panic!), all twenty federal agencies covered by the order managed to get something up before time ran out. (Check the list to the right to see how each agency went about setting up their "open" page.)
Beyond that, there's, frankly, not a tremendous amount to report. The requirement of the OGD on the web page front weren't hugely demanding. In addition to a page in place, all the agencies were really directed to do was to get "incorporate a mechanism for the public to...give feedback on and assessment of" how the departments were doing on the open government front. As Sunlight's John Wonderlich notes, many of the departments chose to simply plug in the GSA-approved IdeaScale tool for collecting and collaboratively vetting that feedback. [Update: Here's what GSA is telling agencies about IdeaScale that has so many of them using it.] Generally speaking, the open gov pages put up by agencies to meet Saturday's deadline are an act of digital flag-planting, functioning as placeholders for more in-depth open government work to come.
The White House had its own homework assignment due this weekend: developing an open government dashboard to track whether and how well the dozens of agencies under its purview are fulfilling what the OGD expects from them. That's up at WhiteHouse.gov/Open/Around. The barebones matrix color-codes the agencies on whether they're providing high-quality data to Data.gov and whether they've got their "Open" home pages up and running. The big, empty box still left to be color-coded? Whether the agencies have drafted comprehensive and meaningful plans to open up their processes in powerful ways. Those plans are due in about two months.
Call it Orszag chic: Rick Snyder, a Republican candidate for governor in Michigan, ran an ad spot during the Super Bowl that touted his bona fides as "one tough nerd," though one of his achievements is distinctly more geeky than nerdy in the details, and that's his tenure as the Chief Operating Officer at Gateway, a.k.a. the computers with the cow spots on the box.
No matter. Being a geek and/or nerd in politics has sometimes earned politicians the label of technocrat -- and it's not always used in an endearing way, particularly in contrast to leaders who offer grander visions about how the world should change. But perhaps its a sign of our data-lovin' times, where the President is cheered for battling to hang onto his BlackBerry, that Synder views his nerd cred as an asset in the beleaguered state of Michigan.
Evidence in favor of the idea of that Synder is, in fact, a detail-obsessed nerd? His campaign website at RickForMichigan.com adds footnotes to his Super Bowl ad.